The good language learner (GLL) studies are a group of academic studies in the area of second language acquisition that deal with the strategies that good language learners exhibit. The rationale for the studies was that there is more benefit from studying the habits of successful language learners than there is from studying learners who fossilize at an early stage or stop studying altogether. It was thought that if the strategies of successful learners could be found, then that knowledge could help learners who were not getting such good results.[1]

The original studies were made in the 1970s, but petered out in the 1980s as researchers concentrated on individual learning strategies. [1] However, some research on the topic has also been carried out in more recent years.[2][3] The main body of GLL research investigated language learning in classroom situations. It found that good language learners could not be distinguished on the basis of observable behavior alone, although personality did seem to have an effect. It also found that teachers did not treat these learners differently from other students, although they could distinguish good language learners from learners who were not so effective.[1]

Original studies

The first studies in the good language learner tradition were made by Joan Rubin and David Stern, both of which were completed in 1975.[4][5] Both of these studies proposed similar lists of strategies that good language learners use. On the basis of this, a large-scale study was performed at the Ontario Institute for Studies in Education (OISE) which investigated 34 language learners with good learning habits. This study found a list of six different strategies, which were similar to those proposed by Rubin and Stern:[6]

  1. Good language learners find an appropriate style of learning.
  2. Good language learners involve themselves in the language-learning process.
  3. Good language learners develop an awareness of language as both system and communication.
  4. Good language learners pay constant attention to expanding their language knowledge.
  5. Good language learners develop the second language as a separate system.
  6. Good language learners take into account the demands that second language learning imposes.

Later work

In spite of the flurry of interest in the GLL in the mid to late 70s, in the 80s and 90s interest moved more in the direction of socio/cultural influences[7] and individual differences,[8] as well as developing the concept of communicative competence[9] into a communicative approach to language teaching.[10]

In the new millennium, Norton and Toohey re-visited the GLL.[11] Their new perspective emphasized the influence of situation, investment and identity on successful language learning.

Seven years later, Griffiths, harking back to Joan Rubin's original title, published "Lessons from Good Language Learners".[12] Whereas the early work in the GLL field had tended to emphasize the role of strategies, Griffiths' work took a broader view and presented the GLL as a highly complex being involving many different variables, including motivation, age, style, personality, gender, metacognition, autonomy, beliefs, culture and aptitude. In addition, the target variables (including grammar, vocabulary, pronunciation, function and skills) and some of the situational factors (including method and error correction practices) which learners must manage if they are to be successful were discussed.

See also

Notes

  1. 1 2 3 Johnson 1999.
  2. ↑ Sewell 2003.
  3. ↑ Thompson 2005.
  4. ↑ Rubin 1975.
  5. ↑ Stern 1975.
  6. ↑ Naiman 1978.
  7. ↑ Especially Vygotsky 1978.
  8. ↑ For instance, Skehan 1989.
  9. ↑ Hymes 1972.
  10. ↑ For instance Widdowson 1978; Littlewood 1981.
  11. ↑ Norton & Toohey 2001.
  12. ↑ Griffiths 2008.

References

  • Griffiths, Carol, ed. (2008). Lessons from Good Language Learners. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-71814-1.
  • Hymes, D. (1972). "On communicative competence". In Pride, J. B.; Holmes, Janet (eds.). Sociolinguistics. Harmondsworth, U.K.: Penguin. pp. 269–293. ISBN 978-0-14-080665-6.
  • Johnson, Keith (1999). "Good language learner studies". Encyclopedic Dictionary of Applied Linguistics. Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers. pp. 141–142. ISBN 978-0-631-22767-0.
  • Littlewood, William (1981). Communicative Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-28154-6.
  • Naiman, N. (1978). The Good Language Learner. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education. ISBN 978-0-7744-0151-7.
  • Norton, Bonny; Toohey, Kelleen (2001). "Changing perspectives on good language learners" (PDF). TESOL Quarterly. 35 (2): 307–322. doi:10.2307/3587650. JSTOR 3587650. Retrieved June 8, 2011.
  • Rubin, Joan (1975). "What the "Good Language Learner" Can Teach Us". TESOL Quarterly. 9 (1): 41–51. doi:10.2307/3586011. JSTOR 3586011.
  • Sewell, H. Douglas (2003-11-15). "The Good Language Learner" (PDF). Birmingham University. Retrieved 2011-03-07.
  • Skehan, Peter (1989). Individual Differences in Second-Language Learning. London: E. Arnold. ISBN 978-0-7131-6602-6.
  • Stern, H. H. (March 1975). "What Can We Learn from the Good Language Learner?". Canadian Modern Language Review. 31 (4): 304–318. doi:10.3138/cmlr.31.4.304.
  • Thompson, Sandee (April 2005). "The 'Good Language Learner'" (PDF). Birmingham University. Retrieved 2011-03-07.
  • Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in Society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-674-57628-5.
  • Widdowson, H. G. (1978). Teaching Language as Communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-437077-6.


This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.