The Great Unrest, also known as the Great Labour Unrest, was a period of labour revolt between 1911 and 1914[1] in the United Kingdom. The agitation included the 1911 Liverpool general transport strike, the Tonypandy riots, the National coal strike of 1912 and the 1913 Dublin lockout. It was United Kingdom's most significant labour unrest since the Industrial Revolution but is not as widely remembered as the 1926 general strike. The period of unrest was labelled "great" not because of its scale, but due to the level of violence employed by both the state and labourers; including deaths of strikers at the hands of police and sabotage on the part of the workers.[2]

Background

During the late 19th century to the start of the Unrest, there were a series of economic booms, busts and worries.[3] Throughout some of them, prices for consumer goods rose, but wages fell, especially with respect to the share of national income going to labour.[4][5] French anarchist and syndicalist thought had taken root in Britain over the past three decades and had inspired radicals such as Tom Mann with ideas about the proper course of action for workers.[6] The period leading up to the unrest also was one in which labour laws in Britain were significantly altered by court cases that were not well received by union members. In both cases, they were later either repealed or partially amended by Parliament. The Taff Vale judgement which made unions liable for damage caused by striking until the Trade Disputes Act 1906. The Osborne judgement banned unions from political spending until the Trade Union Act 1913.[4][5] Additionally, by 1911, a Liberal government had been in power for years and was generally supported by the small Labour Party but had not accomplished enough to satisfy trade unions. Discontent with seeking action through Parliament fuelled extraparliamentary actions such as strikes by syndicalists, socialists and other activist groups.[5][6]

Notable events

From 1911 to 1914, there were more than 3,000 strikes, with over 1,200 in 1913 alone. The number of working days lost was in the tens of millions, and the percentage of the working population involved in strikes increased more than three times between the first decade of the 20th century and the year 1911.[1] The strikes involved male and female workers, but they were not necessarily in the same unions, and the latter were also influenced by the contemporary women's suffrage movement.[7] The period of the unrest coincided with other social upheavals reshaping Britain, including the Irish Nationalist struggle, the Unionist backlash and the women's suffrage movement. The events led later historians to argue (scholars now tend to agree their conclusions were overstated) that without the outbreak of World War I in 1914, there may have been a massive revolt in Britain.[8][5]

Contemporary reactions

Contemporary reactions ranged from supportive to extremely negative, with papers of record like The Times often arguing for the government to be harder on the strikers, whereas more niche publications like the New Age and New Witness gave some modicum of support to the movement. The last two however tended to couch their support in elitist language and looked down upon the working people, rather than viewing them as equals. Various activist groups and radical movements also published their own papers in which they argued for or against strategic decisions or policies being undertaken.[4][9]

Women's suffrage movement

The labour and women's suffrage movements had a tenuous relationship and often were at odds, but there were instances of collaboration between them. The main issue where they differed was the type of suffrage being fought for. Between 1884 and 1918, approximately two thirds of men met the property requirements for voting. The Women's Suffrage movement, at least initially, tended to argue for instituting equal suffrage but retaining existing property qualifications although militant labour activists wanted full adult suffrage without such barriers. However, some groups of women found that the suffrage movement encouraged their workplace activism. Women strikers were emboldened by the example of militant suffragettes, the latter engaging in actions as extreme as mass window-smashing campaigns and serial arson. The National Federation of Women Workers, although it advocated for adult suffrage, in addition to many other reforms, rather than being a single-cause group, grew by more than 10 times from 1906 to 1914.[7]

Syndicalist movement

Anarchism, socialism and syndicalism had a significant role in the militant industrial organizing which was the hallmark of the Unrest. From the mid-to-late 19th century, anarchist groups in France and Britain had exchanged ideas, and syndicalist ideology owed a significant debt to anarchist thinkers. Thinkers like Errico Malatesta and Peter Kropotkin were influenced by syndicalism, which found an important supporter in Tom Mann. Inspired by syndicalist ideology, Mann, a socialist and trade union activist, founded the International Syndicalist Education League (ISEL), which brought those ideas to British workers. The British unions took these ideas and applied them to their massive strikes, an example that crossed the English Channel in reverse and inspired French syndicalists, who looked to industrial unions (unions of entire sectors) in Britain as an example. One difference between French and British syndicalists was that the latter were more accommodating towards state power and saw value in the political process.[6][10] The Social Democratic Federation (SDF) was a mixed supporter of the strikers, but some of its members were more unequivocally for active in the labour struggle.[7]

References

  1. 1 2 Béliard, Yann (January 2014). "Introduction: Revisiting the Great Labour Unrest, 1911-1914". Labour History Review. 79 (1): 1–17. doi:10.3828/lhr.2014.1. ISSN 0961-5652.
  2. ↑ Béliard 2014.
  3. ↑ Thompson, James (January 2014). "The Great Labour Unrest and Political Thought in Britain, 1911-1914". Labour History Review. 79 (1): 37–54. doi:10.3828/lhr.2014.3. ISSN 0961-5652.
  4. 1 2 3 Sires, Ronald V. (September 1955). "Labor Unrest in England, 1910–1914". The Journal of Economic History. 15 (3): 246–266. doi:10.1017/s0022050700057697. ISSN 0022-0507. S2CID 154519628.
  5. 1 2 3 4 O'Connor, Emmet (January 2014). "Old Wine in New Bottles? Syndicalism and 'Fakirism' in the Great Labour Unrest, 1911-1914". Labour History Review. 79 (1): 19–36. doi:10.3828/lhr.2014.2. ISSN 0961-5652.
  6. 1 2 3 Bantman, Constance (January 2014). "The Franco-British Syndicalist Connection and the Great Labour Unrest, 1880s-1914". Labour History Review. 79 (1): 83–96. doi:10.3828/lhr.2014.5. ISSN 0961-5652.
  7. 1 2 3 Darlington, Ralph (2020-10-24). "The pre-First World War British women's suffrage revolt and labour unrest: never the twain shall meet?". Labor History. 61 (5–6): 466–485. doi:10.1080/0023656x.2020.1836612. ISSN 0023-656X. S2CID 204768250.
  8. ↑ Richards (2014). "Model Citizens and Millenarian Subjects: Vorticism, Suffrage, and London's Great Unrest". Journal of Modern Literature. 37 (3): 1. doi:10.2979/jmodelite.37.3.1. ISSN 0022-281X. S2CID 154928566.
  9. ↑ Villis, Tom (January 2005). "Elitism and the revolt of the masses: reactions to the 'great labour unrest' in the New Age and New Witness circles". History of European Ideas. 31 (1): 85–102. doi:10.1016/j.histeuroideas.2003.08.010. ISSN 0191-6599. S2CID 143649210.
  10. ↑ Bantman, Constance (2006). "Internationalism without an International? Cross-Channel Anarchist Networks, 1880-1914". Revue belge de philologie et d'histoire. 84 (4): 961–981. doi:10.3406/rbph.2006.5056. ISSN 0035-0818.

Further reading

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.