ICC Men's T20I Team Rankings

ICC men's T20I team rankings
Administrator	International Cricket Council
Creation	2011
Number of teams	89
Current top ranking	India (265 rating)
Longest cumulative top ranking	Sri Lanka (35 months)
Longest continuous; top ranking	Pakistan (28 months)
Highest rating	Pakistan (287 rating)
	Last updated on: 27 December 2023.

The ICC Men's T20I Team Rankings is an international Twenty20 cricket rankings system of the International Cricket Council.^[1] After every Twenty20 International (T20I) match, the two teams involved receive points based on a mathematical formula. The total of each team's points total is divided by the total number of matches to give a rating, and all teams are ranked on a table in order of rating.^[2] Teams need to have played at least six T20I matches in the previous three to four years to remain in the rankings table.^[3]

India currently leads the ICC men's T20I team rankings, a position they have held since 21 February 2022.^[4]

Current rankings

ICC Men's T20I Team Rankings
Rank	Team	Matches	Points	Rating
1	India	68	18,041	265
2	England	48	12,305	256
3	New Zealand	55	13,988	254
4	Pakistan	53	13,325	251
5	Australia	39	9,760	250
6	South Africa	37	9,210	249
7	West Indies	44	10,800	245
8	Sri Lanka	38	8,940	235
9	Bangladesh	46	10,452	227
10	Afghanistan	34	7,443	219
11	Namibia	28	5,539	198
12	Ireland	47	9,117	194
13	Zimbabwe	50	9,576	192
14	Scotland	18	3,412	190
15	Netherlands	19	3,445	181
16	Nepal	27	4,796	178
17	United Arab Emirates	38	6,623	174
18	Oman	24	3,678	153
19	Papua New Guinea	22	3,173	144
20	Canada	18	2,528	140
21	Hong Kong	28	3,740	134
22	Uganda	65	8,602	132
23	United States	9	1,183	131
24	Jersey	19	2,427	128
25	Malaysia	41	5,132	125
26	Kuwait	28	3,360	120
27	Bahrain	36	3,972	110
28	Qatar	18	1,964	109
29	Kenya	44	4,697	107
30	Bermuda	14	1,494	107
31	Italy	17	1,712	101
32	Saudi Arabia	20	1,992	100
33	Tanzania	49	4,727	96
34	Spain	18	1,649	92
35	Germany	33	3,022	92
36	Singapore	28	2,209	79
37	Guernsey	16	1,212	76
38	Nigeria	30	2,261	75
39	Portugal	16	1,167	73
40	Cayman Islands	11	790	72
41	Denmark	23	1,622	71
42	Belgium	18	1,237	69
43	Isle of Man	15	949	63
44	Cambodia	11	690	63
45	Austria	29	1,682	58
46	Norway	15	852	57
47	Vanuatu	15	846	56
48	Botswana	29	1,543	53
49	Finland	18	953	53
50	Switzerland	16	835	52
51	Japan	15	768	51
52	Malawi	19	933	49
53	Czech Republic	24	1,101	46
54	France	16	730	46
55	Indonesia	22	993	45
56	Sweden	18	759	42
57	Philippines	17	698	41
58	Romania	28	1,149	41
59	Cook Islands	6	245	41
60	Argentina	11	424	39
61	Mozambique	24	864	36
62	Malta	44	1,535	35
63	Rwanda	70	2,255	32
64	Ghana	31	968	31
65	Fiji	10	304	30
66	Bhutan	11	325	30
67	Luxembourg	30	845	28
68	Sierra Leone	28	766	27
69	Cyprus	8	206	26
70	Bahamas	10	241	24
71	Belize	3	66	22
72	Hungary	19	367	19
73	Panama	11	206	19
74	Thailand	14	205	15
75	Serbia	19	214	14
76	Gibraltar	30	385	13
77	Bulgaria	30	289	10
78	Lesotho	9	82	9
79	Estonia	11	60	5
80	Turkey	7	26	4
81	Maldives	16	44	3
82	Cameroon	14	25	2
83	Gambia	9	11	1
84	Eswatini	18	0	0
85	Seychelles	7	0	0
86	Samoa	9	0	0
87	Mali	8	0	0
88	Croatia	10	0	0
89	Greece	6	0	0
References: ICC T20I rankings, As of 2 January 2024
"Matches" is the number of matches played in the 12–24 months since the May before last, plus half the number in the 24 months before that.

Points calculations

Time period

Each team scores points based on the results of their matches over the last 3−4 years − the matches played in the 12–24 months since the May before last, plus the matches played in the 24 months before that, for which the matches played and points earned both count half. For example:

	May 2010		May 2011		May 2012		May 2013		May 2014	May 2015

Between May 2013 and April 2014:		Results that were achieved during this period have 50% weighting				Results that were achieved during this period have 100% weighting

Between May 2014 and April 2015:				Results that were achieved during this period have 50% weighting				Results that were achieved during this period have 100% weighting

Each May, the matches and points earned between 3 and 4 years ago are removed, and the matches and points earned between 1 and 2 years ago switch from 100% weighting to 50% weighting. For example, on 1 May 2014, the matches played between May 2010 and April 2011 were removed, and the matches played between May 2012 and April 2013 switched to 50% weighting (the matches from May 2011 to April 2012 would have already been at 50% following the previous rerating). This happens overnight, so can result in teams changing positions in the ranking table despite no one playing.

Find the points earned from a match

Each time two teams play another match, the rankings table is updated as follows, based on the ratings of the teams immediately before they played. To determine the teams' new ratings after a particular match, first calculate the points earned from the match:

If the gap between the ratings of the two teams before the match was less than 40 points, then points will be as follows:

Match result	Points earned
Win	Opponent's rating + 50
Tie	Opponent's rating
Lose	Opponent's rating − 50

If the gap between the ratings of the two teams before the match was at least 40 points, then points will be as follows:

Match result	Points earned
Stronger team wins	Own rating + 10
Weaker team loses	Own rating − 10
Stronger team ties	Own rating − 40
Weaker team ties	Own rating + 40
Stronger team loses	Own rating − 90
Weaker team wins	Own rating + 90

Example

Suppose Team A, with an initial rating of 100, plays Team B. The table shows the points awarded to the two teams for 9 different initial ratings for B (ranging from 20 to 160), and the three possible match results.

Initial ratings		Scenario	Team A wins & Team B loses. Points earned:				Match tied. Points earned:				Team A loses & Team B wins. Points earned:				Total initial ratings	Total points earned (All 3 results)
Team A	Team B	Scenario	Team A		Team B		Team A		Team B		Team A		Team B		Total initial ratings	Total points earned (All 3 results)
100	20	Initial ratings at least 40 points apart	Stronger team wins: Own rating + 10	110	Weaker team loses: Own rating − 10	10	Stronger team ties: Own rating − 40	60	Weaker team ties: Own rating + 40	60	Stronger team loses: Own rating − 90	10	Weaker team wins: Own rating + 90	110	120	120
100	40			110		30		60		80		10		130	140	140
100	60			110		50		60		100		10		150	160	160
100	70	Initial ratings less than 40 points apart	Win: Opponent's rating + 50	120	Lose: Opponent's rating − 50	50	Tie: Opponent's rating	70	Tie: Opponent's rating	100	Lose: Opponent's rating − 50	20	Win: Opponent's rating + 50	150	170	170
100	90			140		50		90		100		40		150	190	190
100	110			160		50		110		100		60		150	210	210
100	130			180		50		130		100		80		150	230	230
100	140	Initial ratings at least 40 points apart	Weaker team wins: Own rating + 90	190	Stronger team loses: Own rating − 90	50	Weaker team ties: Own rating + 40	140	Stronger team ties: Own rating − 40	100	Weaker team loses: Own rating − 10	90	Stronger team wins: Own rating + 10	150	240	240
100	160	Initial ratings at least 40 points apart		190	Stronger team loses: Own rating − 90	70	Weaker team ties: Own rating + 40	140	Stronger team ties: Own rating − 40	120	Weaker team loses: Own rating − 10	90	Stronger team wins: Own rating + 10	170	260	260

This illustrates that:

The winning team earns more points than the losing team. (Unless the ratings are more than 180 apart and the weaker team wins − highly unlikely.)
Winning always earns a team 100 points more than losing, and 50 more than tying.
The total points earned by the two teams is always the same as the total initial ratings of the two teams.
The points earned by a winning team increases as the initial rating (quality) of the opposition increases, within the constraints of earning at least its own initial rating + 10, and no more than its own initial rating + 90. A winning team therefore always earns more points than its initial rating, increasing its overall average rating.
The points earned by a losing team increases as the initial rating (quality) of the opposition increases, within the constraints of earning at least its own initial rating − 90, and no more than its own initial rating − 10. A losing team therefore always earns fewer points than its initial rating, decreasing its overall average rating.
In a tie, the weaker team usually earns more points than the stronger team (unless the initial ratings are at least 80 apart), reflecting the fact that a tie is a better result for the weaker team than the stronger team. Also, the stronger team will earn fewer points than its initial rating, decreasing its average, and the weaker team more points that its initial rating, increasing its average.
For a given result, the rule of how the two teams' points are calculated changes as the initial ratings change, from being based on teams' own ratings when one team is far stronger, to being based on the opponent's ratings when the teams are closely matched, back to being based on own ratings when the other team is far stronger. However, despite these sudden changes in the rule, the number of points awarded for each result changes smoothly as the initial ratings change.

Find the new ratings

Each team's rating is equal to its total points scored divided by the total matches played. (Series are not significant in these calculations).
Add the match points scored to the points already scored (in previous matches as reflected by the table), add one to the number of matches played, and determine the new rating.
Points earned by teams depend on the opponent's ratings, therefore this system needed to assign base ratings to teams when it started.

Historical rankings

This table lists the teams that have historically held the highest rating since the T20I rankings was introduced. In April 2018, the ICC decided to grant full T20I status to all its members. As a result, ratings of leading teams since 2018 have been considerably higher, and cannot be directly compared to those before that date.

Country	Start	End	Duration	Cumulative	Highest Rating
England	24 October 2011^[5]	7 August 2012 ^[6]	289 days	289 days	140
South Africa	8 August 2012	11 September 2012	35 days	35 days	137
England	12 September 2012	21 September 2012	10 days	299 days	130
South Africa	22 September 2012	28 September 2012	7 days	42 days	134
Sri Lanka	29 September 2012	27 March 2014	545 days	545 days	134
India	28 March 2014	2 April 2014	6 days	6 days	130
Sri Lanka	3 April 2014	3 April 2014	1 day	546 days	131
India	4 April 2014	5 April 2014	2 days	8 days	132
Sri Lanka	6 April 2014	30 April 2014	25 days	571 days	133
India	1 May 2014	6 September 2014	129 days	137 days	131
Sri Lanka	7 September 2014	9 January 2016	490 days	1061 days	135
West Indies	10 January 2016	30 January 2016	21 days	21 days	118
India	31 January 2016	8 February 2016	9 days	146 days	120
Sri Lanka	9 February 2016	11 February 2016	3 days	1064 days	121
India	12 February 2016	3 May 2016	82 days	228 days	127
New Zealand	4 May 2016	31 October 2017	546 days	546 days	132
Pakistan	1 November 2017	3 November 2017	3 days	3 days	124
New Zealand	4 November 2017	6 November 2017	3 days	549 days	124
Pakistan	7 November 2017	2 January 2018	57 days	60 days	124
New Zealand	3 January 2018	27 January 2018	25 days	574 days	128
Pakistan	28 January 2018	30 April 2020	824 days	884 days	286
Australia	1 May 2020	5 September 2020	128 days	128 days	278
England	6 September 2020	7 September 2020	2 days	301 days	273
Australia	8 September 2020	30 November 2020	84 days	212 days	275
England	1 December 2020	20 February 2022	447 days	748 days	278
India	21 February 2022	Present	694 days	922 days	270
Last updated 15 December 2023

The summary of teams that have held the highest rating by days, are:

Team	Total Days	Highest Rating
Sri Lanka	1064	135
India	890	270
Pakistan	884	286
England	748	278
New Zealand	574	132
Australia	212	278
South Africa	42	137
West Indies	21	118

References

↑ "Twenty20 rankings launched with England on top". 24 October 2011. Retrieved 24 October 2011.
↑ "David Richardson previews the release of the Reliance ICC T20I Rankings". Retrieved 24 October 2011.
↑ "ICC unveils Global Men's T20I Rankings Table featuring 80 teams". Retrieved 3 May 2019.
↑ "ICC Ranking for T20 teams International Cricket Council". www.icc-cricket.com. Retrieved 26 April 2023.
↑ "ICC rankings - ICC Test, ODI and Twenty20 rankings". 25 October 2011. Archived from the original on 25 October 2011. Retrieved 16 December 2018.
↑ "England rise to No.1 in ODIs". ESPNcricinfo.

External links

ICC Men's T20I Team Rankings

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.

[1] "Twenty20 rankings launched with England on top". 24 October 2011. Retrieved 24 October 2011.

[2] "David Richardson previews the release of the Reliance ICC T20I Rankings". Retrieved 24 October 2011.

[3] "ICC unveils Global Men's T20I Rankings Table featuring 80 teams". Retrieved 3 May 2019.

[4] "ICC Ranking for T20 teams International Cricket Council". www.icc-cricket.com. Retrieved 26 April 2023.

[5] "ICC rankings - ICC Test, ODI and Twenty20 rankings". 25 October 2011. Archived from the original on 25 October 2011. Retrieved 16 December 2018.

[6] "England rise to No.1 in ODIs". ESPNcricinfo.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]