Proposition 2
Shall the above-entitled measure [see text] proposed by Proposition Two be approved?[1]
Results
Choice
Votes  %
Yes 105,778 23.94%
No 336,083 76.06%

Idaho Proposition 2 was a 2006 ballot initiative in the state of Idaho, U.S. that aimed to force government to reimburse property owners whose property value is decreased as a result of government regulation.

The initiative, which is similar to the controversial Oregon Ballot Measure 37 (2004), was defeated.[2]

Text

The long title of the proposition states:

AN INITIATIVE RELATING TO EMINENT DOMAIN; AMENDING SECTION 7 701, IDAHO CODE, TO PROVIDE LIMITATIONS ON EMINENT DOMAIN FOR PRIVATE PARTIES, AND FOR URBAN RENEWAL OR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PURPOSES; AND PROVIDE FOR FURTHER JUDICIAL REVIEW OF PROCEEDINGS INVOLVING THE EXERCISE OF EMINENT DOMAIN; ADDING A NEW SECTION 7-701A TO PROVIDE FOR DEFINITIONS RELATING TO HIGHEST AND BEST USE, FAIR MARKET VALUE, JUST COMPENSATION, AND LAND USE LAW; AND AMENDING CHAPTER 80, TITLE 67, IDAHO CODE, TO PROVIDE FOR JUST COMPENSATION WHEN A REGULATORY ACTION REDUCES FAIR MARKET VALUE OF PROPERTY AND TO PROVIDE JUST COMPENSATION TO A CONDEMNEE.

Result by county

County Yes Yes % No No %
Ada 29,002 24.68% 88,493 75.32%
Adams 387 23.08% 1,290 76.92%
Bannock 4,298 17.70% 19,991 82.30%
Bear Lake 752 33.59% 1,487 66.41%
Benewah 633 22.17% 2,222 77.83%
Bingham 2,278 17.87% 10,473 82.13%
Blaine 1,394 19.19% 5,870 80.81%
Boise 851 29.88% 1,997 70.12%
Bonner 3,505 25.47% 10,258 74.53%
Bonneville 5,505 18.24% 24,674 81.76%
Boundary 877 27.82% 2,275 72.18%
Butte 258 23.16% 856 76.84%
Camas 70 15.59% 379 84.41%
Canyon 11,672 27.80% 30,320 72.70%
Caribou 371 14.75% 2,145 85.25%
Cassia 1,274 22.40% 4,413 77.60%
Clark 68 20.30% 267 79.70%
Clearwater 827 28.40% 2,085 71.60%
Custer 585 30.92% 1,307 69.08%
Elmore 1,583 27.64% 4,026 72.36%
Franklin 1,402 36.76% 2,412 63.24%
Fremont 788 18.08% 3,570 81.92%
Gem 1,597 28.45% 4,016 71.55%
Gooding 778 18.93% 3,332 81.07%
Idaho 2,056 32.60% 4,250 67.40%
Jefferson 1,420 19.34% 5,921 80.66%
Jerome 921 19.64% 3,869 80.36%
Kootenai 9,873 26.74% 27,051 73.26%
Latah 2,793 23.69% 8,999 76.31%
Lemhi 807 26.01% 2,296 73.99%
Lewis 413 30.28% 951 69.72%
Lincoln 298 20.82% 1,133 79.18%
Madison 1,331 16.68% 6,650 83.32%
Minidoka 1,038 20.39% 4,053 79.61%
Nez Perce 3,438 29.08% 8,384 70.92%
Oneida 448 29.97% 1,047 70.03%
Owyhee 994 36.52% 1,728 63.48%
Payette 1,883 32.79% 3,860 67.21%
Power 327 15.63% 1,765 84.37%
Shoshone 1,034 27.90% 2,672 72.10%
Teton 643 21.02% 2,416 78.98%
Twin Falls 3,532 18.47% 15,594 81.53%
Valley 846 21.92% 3,014 78.08%
Washington 973 29.09% 2,372 70.91%

Source: Idaho Secretary of State

References

  1. "Sample Proposition Ballot" (PDF). Idaho Secretary of State. September 26, 2006. Archived from the original (PDF) on September 26, 2006. Retrieved November 26, 2021.
  2. 2006 General Results statewide Archived 2006-12-13 at the Wayback Machine


This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.