Jameel v Wall Street Journal Europe
CourtHouse of Lords
Decided11 October 2006
Citation(s)
  • [2007] 1 AC 359
  • [2006] 4 All ER 1279
  • [2006] UKHL 44
  • [2006] HRLR 41
  • [2007] Bus LR 291
  • [2006] 3 WLR 642
  • [2007] EMLR 2
  • [2007] EMLR 14
  • 21 BHRC 471
Case history
Prior action(s)[2005] EWCA Civ 74
Court membership
Judge(s) sitting
  • Lord Bingham of Cornhill
  • Lord Hoffmann
  • Lord Hope of Craighead
  • Lord Scott of Foscote
  • Baroness Hale of Richmond

Jameel & Ors v Wall Street Journal Europe Sprl[1] was a House of Lords judgment on English defamation law. The issue was whether the defamatory article was protected by Reynolds privilege. The judgment was an affirmation of Reynolds v Times Newspapers Ltd and effectively upholds a public interest defence in libel cases.

References

  1. ↑ "Jameel & Ors v. Wall Street Journal Europe Sprl [2006] UKHL 44 (11 October 2006)". BAWAII.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.