Lahore High Court

He was elevated as a Judge of the Lahore High Court on 4 December 2004. He was one of the judges who refused to take an oath under the Provisional Constitutional Order, preferring to resign instead. He was restored as a LHC judge as a result of the Lawyers' Movement.

As a judge of the Lahore High Court, he presided over cases related to constitutional rights, civil and commercial disputes, and public interest. On 1 June 2012, he was appointed as the 41st Chief Justice of Lahore High Court.^[8][9] He served at that post until his appointment as a Supreme Court judge on 16 June 2014.^[10][11][12]

Supreme Court of Pakistan

Bandial's appointment as the Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) was approved by Alvi on 13 January 2022.^[1] He was sworn in on 2 February 2022, in a ceremony at Aiwan-e-Sadr.^[13][14]

In his first month, he initiated reforms in various organs of the Supreme Court, including the Case Management System, to ensure provision of speedy justice. He reorganized the bodies that dealt with administrative and judicial powers, including the building committee, record enrolment committee, Supreme Court research affairs branch, and law clerk programme. He appointed Qazi Faez Isa, Sardar Tariq Masood, Ijazul Ahsan, Mazhar Alam, and Sajjad Ali Shah as the monitoring judges of the provincial anti-terrorism courts of Balochistan, Islamabad, Punjab, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, and Sindh, respectively.

As the CJP, Justice Bandial was elected as chairman of the Supreme Judicial Council, Judicial Commission of Pakistan, and Law and Justice Commission. The structure of these three bodies was changed completely.^[15]

In his first month as CJP, the Supreme Court decided a record 1,761 cases in an effort to address the issue of pendency. Senior lawyers noted the discipline in the fixation of cases and formation of benches.^[16]

In 2022, he was named among the Time 100 most influential people.^[17]

Crisis in Judiciary

Justice Mandokhel refused to sit down chief justice and the other bench members due to disagreements with the bench members.^[18] Justice Minallah regrets apex court's conduct, terms it akin to 'advancing political strategies'^[19] Justice Minallah calls for 'introspection' as country verges on constitutional crisis. Justice Minallah, who is among those judges of the apex court who have rejected the suo motu notice taken by the Chief Justice of Pakistan Umar Ata Bandial regarding the delay in polls in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Punjab, said that by entertaining the petitions and suo motu jurisdiction, the court would be "unjustifiably undermining the independence of two provincial high courts."^[20] Judges must not be seen as 'politicians in robes', says Justice Minallah^[21]

Foreign Minister Bilawal Bhutto Zardari, who is also the Chairman of PPP said that Judicial dictatorship not acceptable. He said "If there is no difference among the SC judges, then what is the issue in constituting a full court? You can save the country from the constitutional crisis by making a full court."^[22] Collation Government asked Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Umar Ata Bandial to first put his "own house in order" before asking politicians to sit together.^[23]

Former Sindh High Court Bar Association president Salahuddin Ahmed told Dawn that he is also of the opinion that the current conflict within the judiciary is fast heading towards a 1997-like situation.^[24]

Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Umar Ata Bandial has reached out to his fellow judges to put an end to the division in the Supreme Court as the controversy surrounding the top court's verdict on election delay case in Punjab and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP) continues to deepen.^[25]

Resolution against Judiciary

On 28 March 2023, the Pakistani government unanimously passed a controversial resolution against the Judiciary. The resolution, which was introduced by Information Minister Maryam Aurangzeb, rejects the Judiciary's interference in the legislative process.^[26] On 6 April 2023, The National Assembly passed a resolution to reject the decision of the three-member bench of the Supreme Court (SC) — which had instructed the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) to conduct snap polls in the country.^[27]

Justice Naqvi Controversy

First time in the Pakistan History, The Pakistan Bar Council (PBC), the apex regularity body of lawyers, on Friday filed a complaint of misconduct against Supreme Court's Justice Sayyed Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi in the Supreme Judicial Council (SJC).^[28]

Two judges of the Supreme Court, Justice Qazi Faez Isa and Justice Sardar Tariq Masood, have written to the Supreme Judicial Council (SJC), urging the top judicial body to initiate proceedings on complaints of alleged "misconduct and financial impropriety" against their fellow apex court judge, Justice Sayyed Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi.^[29]

However, the Supreme Judicial Council meeting was not yet called by Chief Justice Umar ata Bandial. The prime minister also pointedly asked the chief justice to respond to the allegation of corruption against a fellow judge."I want to ask the chief justice, that a judge against whom there have been serious allegations, what message do you want to send to the nation by having him sit alongside you?" the premier said.^[30]

Disputed appointment of Registrar

The federal cabinet withdrew the services of Supreme Court Registrar Ishrat Ali after a letter from Justice Qazi Faez Isa that sought the removal of the circular by the registrar.^[31]

Justice Qazi Mentioned in the letter that the bureaucratic holding of the office of the Registrar violates Article 175 (3) of the Constitution, which mandates the complete separation of the Judiciary and the Executive. Justice Qazi stated that Registrar's conduct demonstrates that he does not have the requisite competence, ability, and understanding to hold the office of the Registrar.^[32] However, Pakistan's Chief Justice Umar Ata Bandial Tuesday directed the registrar of the Supreme Court to not relinquish the charge of his office.^[33]

Demand of resignation

The government asked Chief Justice Umar Ata Bandial's resignation on Friday, a day after the PDM-led federal government issued a resolution opposing the Supreme Court's (SC) decision mandating elections in Punjab on 14 May 2023. In a confrontational press conference, the Federal Minister of Information, Marriyum Aurangzeb, sought the resignation of Chief Justice Umar Ata Bandial, asserting that the recent case was not about elections but rather bench fixing.^[34][35]

Nawaz Sharif, the leader of the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PMLN), demanded the Chief Justice of Pakistan quit immediately and accused him of promoting the PTI party's agenda. Sharif criticised the CJ in a tweet on Friday, asserting that courts should help nations escape crises rather than drive them into them. He further charged the chief justice with supporting the PTI's agenda and imposing the minority's viewpoint over the majority's decision in the Punjab election case.^[36][37]

Amid a deepening political and constitutional crisis, the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Bar Council has joined the people demanding Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Umar Ata Bandial's resignation, asking the top judge to step down as he had become "controversial".^[38]

Another complaint against four Supreme Court (SC) judges including Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Umar Ata Bandial was filed on Monday at the Supreme Judicial Council (SJC) seeking their removal from office. In addition to the CJP, Justice Munib Akhtar, Justice Ijazul Ahsan and Justice Mazhar Ali Naqvi have been named in the complaint.^[39]

SC (Practice and Procedure) Bill 2023

The government presents a bill in the National Assembly as PM Shehbaz Sharif accuses the top court of creating 'political instability'.^[40] Pakistan SC sets up larger bench against bill recently passed to curtail powers of Chief Justice.^[41]

However, the legal fraternity has strongly reacted over the composition of the eight-member larger bench of the Supreme Court hearing “premature petitions” against the SC (Practice and Procedure) Bill 2023, saying that the selection of judges for this purpose was justifying that the discretionary powers of the chief justice of Pakistan should be regulated. Advocate Salar Khan pointed out that with the predictability of this bench, the CJP, himself, made the best case for passing the very same law that this petition had challenged.^[42]

Coalition parties reject 'controversial' SC bench formed to take up SC bill. "There is a conflict of interest as bill passed against CJP's powers is being heard by himself," law minister say ^[43]

SC puts on hold non-existent law in pre-emptive strike.^[44]

Alleged audio leak of Bandial's mother-in-law

On 23 April 2023, a supposedly recorded phone call between Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf's lawyer Khawaja Tariq Rahim's wife Rafia Tariq and Chief Justice Umar Ata Bandial's mother-in-law Mahjabeen Noon went viral. They reportedly discussed their support for the chief justice of the Supreme Court and their desire for immediate elections. The women allegedly voiced anger towards the PDM's government during the claimed call.^[45][46]

The PDM government later formed a judicial commission to investigate the leaked audio call and requested CJP Bandial to step down from the bench in order to guarantee that proper justice be delivered.^[47]