Sale of Goods (Amendment) Act 1994
Act of Parliament
Parliament of the United Kingdom
Long titleAn Act to abolish the rule of law relating to the sale of goods in market overt.
Citation1994 c. 32
Dates
Royal assent3 November 1994
Commencement3 January 1995
Other legislation
Amends
Status: Current legislation
Text of statute as originally enacted
Text of the Sale of Goods (Amendment) Act 1994 as in force today (including any amendments) within the United Kingdom, from legislation.gov.uk.

Market overt or marché ouvert (Law French for "open market") is an English legal concept originating in medieval times governing subsequent ownership of stolen goods.[1] The rule was abolished in England and Wales in 1994 but it is still good law in some common law jurisdictions such as Hong Kong and British Columbia.[2]

In general, the sale of stolen goods does not convey effective title (see Nemo dat quod non habet). However, under marché ouvert, if goods were openly sold in designated markets between sunrise and sunset, provenance could not be questioned, and effective title of ownership was obtained.[3][4][5] The law originated centuries ago when people did not travel much; if the victim of a theft did not bother to look in his local market on market day—the only place where the goods were likely to be—he was not being suitably diligent.[6]

Abolition in England and Wales

The Sale of Goods (Amendment) Act 1994, whose sole purpose was to abolish market overt and its equivalent in Wales, came into force in January 1995, repealing section 22(1) of the Sale of Goods Act 1979 and section 47 of the Laws in Wales Act 1542.[7]

One designated market was Bermondsey Market, in South London. A relatively-recent case of stolen goods sold there was in the early 1990s had several portraits by well-known 18th-century portrait painters that had been stolen from Lincoln's Inn,[8] each sold for less than £100 from an outside stall. Since they had been sold in 'market overt', the purchaser could keep them.[9][10] Estelle Morris, Minister for the Arts stated during the second reading of the Dealing in Cultural Objects (Offences) Bill in July 2003:

I did not have information about marché ouvert in the deep recesses of my mind, but experts reliably inform me that it no longer exists. The hon. Member for Uxbridge (Mr. Randall) will be surprised to learn that it has been abolished only recently. It used to exist in designated markets, including Bermondsey. I am sure that the promoter will be interested in telling the hon. Member for Southwark, North and Bermondsey (Simon Hughes) about that. In it, items could be sold before sunrise [sic]. Believe it or not, in this land of ours, people could sell stolen—my officials put "dodgy" in brackets, but we do not use that term—objects. I assure hon. Members that it has been abolished. I hope that that deals with the fears of the hon. Member for Uxbridge.[11]

References

  1. ↑ "Appendix 60: Memorandum submitted by the Council for the Prevention of Art Theft". Select Committee on Culture, Media and Sport: Appendices to the Minutes of Evidence. London: British House of Commons. 25 June 2000. pp. section 3.1.
  2. ↑ "Sale of Goods Act". www.bclaws.ca. Retrieved 23 May 2019.
  3. ↑ "'Thieves' charter' nears end of its reign: The law of market overt may". The Independent. 23 October 2011.
  4. ↑ O'Connell, Anna (October 2005). "The Controversial Rule of Market Overt". Art Loss Review. Archived from the original on 8 October 2007. Retrieved 31 August 2007.
  5. ↑ Lennon, Peter (15 March 2003). "A safe little earner". The Guardian. Retrieved 31 August 2007.
  6. ↑ Bishopsgate Motor Finance Corpn. v. Tpt. Brakes, 1949 1 K.B. 322.
  7. ↑ "Sale of Goods (Amendment) Act 1994", legislation.gov.uk, The National Archives, 1994 c. 32
  8. ↑ "Gainsborough and Reynolds Paintings Stolen". Associated Press.
  9. ↑ Burroughs, Katrina (30 May 2001). "In the market for a bargain". Evening Standard. Archived from the original on 6 October 2018.
  10. ↑ "Wall Street Journal". Wall Street Journal: A9. 26 August 1993.
  11. ↑ "Hansard Debates". Parliamentary Debates (Hansard). House of Commons. 4 July 2003. col. 663–664. Archived from the original on 11 March 2007.

Further reading

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.