The North Dorset by-election was a Parliamentary by-election held on 26 January 1905.[1] The constituency returned one Member of Parliament (MP) to the House of Commons of the United Kingdom, elected by the first past the post voting system.

Vacancy

John Wingfield Digby had been the Conservative member for the seat of North Dorset since the 1892 general election. He died on 25 December 1904 at the age of 46.[2]

Electoral history

The seat had been Conservative since they gained it in 1892. They easily held the seat at the last election, with an increased majority:

General election 1900[3]
Party Candidate Votes % ±%
Conservative John Wingfield Digby 3,705 53.9
Liberal George Hamilton-Gordon 3,165 46.1
Majority 540 7.8
Turnout 6,870 82.6
Conservative hold Swing

Candidates

The Conservatives selected 26-year-old Sir Randolf Baker to defend the seat.[4]

The local Liberal Association selected 37-year-old Arthur Walters Wills as their candidate. He took honours in law in 1890. As a Barrister-at-law, he was called to Bar in 1894 and joined the Western Circuit. He was standing for parliament for the first time.[5]

Campaign

Polling Day was fixed for 26 January 1905, 32 days after the death of the previous MP. The Liberals launched a by-weekly newspaper, the "North Dorset Elector" for the campaign.[6] Religion still played its part in the campaign. Speaking at a meeting of the Blandford Free Church Council, Dr Clifford endorsed the Liberal candidate stressing his opposition to the Unionist government's Education Act 1902 that used taxpayer money to fund protestant schools.[7]

Result

The Liberals gained the seat from the Conservatives:

North Dorset by-election, 1905[8]
Party Candidate Votes % ±%
Liberal Arthur Walters Wills 4,239 56.0 +9.9
Conservative Randolf Littlehales Baker 3,330 44.0 -9.9
Majority 909 12.0 N/A
Turnout 7,569 90.8 +8.2
Liberal gain from Conservative Swing +9.9

North Dorset became the 15th Liberal by-election gain of the parliament from the Unionists. It was the second by-election gain in Dorset in less than a year. It was also the second Liberal by-election gain of the month. The national press reporting of the result varied, depending on the political bias. The Liberal papers saw omens for a future general election; The Daily Chronicle said "When by-elections are frequent, when they take place in all parts of the country, and when they exhibit a uniform tendency, it is impossible not to see in them evidence of the general trend of political opinion." The Daily News said "The Government are smitten all over the field; but we suspect that after Lancashire their worst beating will come from agricultural England." The Conservative papers remained in denial; The Times implied the Conservatives could regain North Dorset because they managed to do so in 1892 when they started further behind the Liberals. The Times also believed that the Unionist case for Tariff Reform would win over voters at the next general election.[9]

Aftermath

At the following General Election the result was:

General election 1906[10]
Party Candidate Votes % ±%
Liberal Arthur Walters Wills 4,153 54.2 -1.8
Conservative Randolf Littlehales Baker 3,508 45.8 +1.8
Majority 645 8.4 -3.6
Turnout 7,661 90.2 -0.6
Liberal hold Swing -1.8

References

  1. ↑ Craig, F.W.S. (1987). Chronology of British Parliamentary By-elections 1833–1987. Chichester: Parliamentary Research Services. p. 99.
  2. ↑ Who Was Who
  3. ↑ British parliamentary election results 1885-1918 by Craig
  4. ↑ Who Was Who
  5. ↑ Who Was Who
  6. ↑ St James Gazette January 9, 1905
  7. ↑ Standard January 24, 1905
  8. ↑ British parliamentary election results 1885-1918 by Craig
  9. ↑ St James Gazette January 28, 1905
  10. ↑ British parliamentary election results 1885-1918 by Craig
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.