Alternate wetting and drying (AWD) is a water management technique, practiced to cultivate irrigated lowland rice with much less water than the usual system of maintaining continuous standing water in the crop field. It is a method of controlled and intermittent irrigation. A periodic drying and re-flooding irrigation scheduling approach is followed in which the fields are allowed to dry for few days before re-irrigation, without stressing the plants. This method reduces water demand for irrigation and greenhouse gas emissions without reducing crop yields.

History

Drying and flooding practices have been used for several decades as a water-saving measure, but in many cases, farmers were practicing an uncontrolled or unplanned drying and re-flooding method. Farmers were practicing ‘forced’ AWD as early as 2006 in the AMRIS region.[1] Some water management practices and especially keeping non-flooded conditions in the rice field for short intervals are common for about 40% of rice farmers in China and more than 80% rice farmers in North-Western India and in Japan.[2] However, nowadays farmers follow a ‘safe’ AWD in which they maintain the 15-cm subsurface water level threshold for re-flooding.[3] This method has become a recommended practice in water-scarce irrigated rice areas in South and Southeast Asia. In the Philippines, the adoption of safe AWD started in Tarlac Province in 2002 with farmers using deep-well pump systems.[3] The International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) has been promoting alternate wetting and drying as a smart water-saving technology for rice cultivation through national agricultural research and extension in Bangladesh, the Philippines, and Vietnam.

Implementation and operation

AWD is suitable for lowland rice growing areas where soils can be drained in 5-day intervals.[2] The field will be unable to dry during rice season if rainfall exceeds evapotranspiration and seepage. Therefore, AWD is suitable for dry season rice cultivation.

Implementation method

Illustration of alternate wetting and drying method

A water tube/pipe made of PVC is usually used to practice AWD method. The main purpose of the tube is to monitor the water depth. The tube allows measuring water availability in the field below the soil surface. The usual practice is to use a pipe of 7–10 cm diameter and 30 cm long, with perforations in bottom 20 cm. The pipe is installed in such a way that the bottom 20 cm of perforated portion remains below the soil surface and the non-perforated 10 cm above the surface. The perforations permit the water to come inside the tube from the soil, where a scale is used to measure water depth below the soil surface. However, there are variations in preparing the tube/pipe for the implementation of AWD. Some farmers use a bamboo pipe instead of PVC pipe. Some farmers use a 30 cm tube with 15 cm perforated at the bottom.

Operation technique

Illustration of AWD operation technique

After the irrigation in the crop field, the water depth gradually decreases because of evapotranspiration, seepage, and percolation. Because of the installed tubes in the field, it is possible to monitor the water depth below the soil surface up to 15–20 cm. When the water level drops 15 cm below the soil surface, irrigation should be applied in the field to re-flood to a depth of 5 cm. During the flowering stage of the rice, the field should be kept flooded. After flowering, during the mid-season and late season (grain filling and ripening stages), the water level is allowed to drop below the soil surface to 15 cm before re-irrigation. To suppress the growth of weeds in the rice field, AWD method should be followed 1–2 weeks after the transplantation. In the case of many weeds in the field, AWD needs to be started after three weeks of transplantation. Usually, the fertilizer recommendations are as same as continuous flooding method. Application of nitrogen fertilizer is preferable on dry soil just before re-irrigation. To ensure a similar dry or wet condition throughout the crop field, which is essential to maintain good yield, it is important to level the rice field properly.[2]

Advantages and disadvantages

Advantages

AWD method can save water by about 38% without adversely affecting rice yields.[4] This method increases water productivity by 16.9% compared with continuously flood irrigation.[5] High-yielding rice varieties developed for continuously flood irrigation rice system still produce high yield under safe AWD.[6] This method can even increase grain yield because of enhancement in grain-filling rate, root growth and remobilization of carbon reserves from vegetative tissues to grains.[7][8][9]

AWD can reduce the cost of irrigation by reducing pumping costs and fuel consumption.[10] This method can also reduce the labor costs by improving field conditions at harvest, allowing mechanical harvest.[11] AWD leads to firmer soil conditions at harvest, which is suitable to operate machines in the field.[2] Therefore, AWD increases net return for farmers.

Several studies also indicate that AWD reduces methane (CH4) emissions.[12] AWD practice reduced seasonal CH4 emissions up to 85%.[13][14] CH4 is produced by the anaerobic decomposition of the organic material in the wet/flooded paddy field. Allowing to drop water level below soil surface removes the anaerobic condition for some time until re-flooded and pauses the production of CH4 from the rice field for several times and, hence, reduce the total amount of CH4 released during the rice growing season. This method has been assumed to reduce CH4 emissions by an average of 48% compared to continuous flooding in the 2006 IPCC methodology.

Alternate wetting and moderate soil drying reduce cadmium accumulation in rice grains.[8] AWD can dramatically reduce the concentration of arsenic in harvested rice grains.[15] A variant of AWD such as e-AWD practice can reduce grain arsenic, lead and cadmium levels up to 66, 73 and 33% respectively.[13] This method can also reduce insect pests and diseases.[16] Periodic soil drying may reduce the incidence of fungal diseases.[2]

Disadvantages

The major disadvantage of AWD method is the increased N2O emissions.[12] Also, rice productivity can reduce by following AWD for non-trained farmers. High weed growth rate in the crop field is a major problem from the farmers' point of view.

See also

References

  1. ↑ AMRIS-JICA, 2007. Project Completion Report: Irrigators’ Association Strengthening Support in Angat Maasim River Irrigation System. Technical Cooperation Project.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 Richards, M., Sander, B.O., 2014. Alternate wetting and drying in irrigated rice. Implementation guidance for policymakers and investors. https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/bitstreams/34363/retrieve
  3. 1 2 Lampayan, R.M., Palis, F.G., Flor, R.B., Bouman, B.A., Quicho, E., De Dios, J., Espiritu, A., Sibayan, E., Vicmudo, V., Lactaoen, A., 2009. Adoption and dissemination of “safe alternate wetting and drying” in pump irrigated rice areas in the Philippines, 60th International Executive Council Meeting of the International Commission on Irrigation and Drainage (ICID), 5th Regional Conference.
  4. ↑ Rejesus, R.M., Palis, F.G., Rodriguez, D.G.P., Lampayan, R.M., Bouman, B.A., 2011. Impact of the alternate wetting and drying (AWD) water-saving irrigation technique: evidence from rice producers in the Philippines. Food Policy 36, 280-288.
  5. ↑ Tan, X., Shao, D., Liu, H., Yang, F., Xiao, C., Yang, H., 2013. Effects of alternate wetting and drying irrigation on percolation and nitrogen leaching in paddy fields. Paddy and Water Environment 11, 381-395.
  6. ↑ Yao, F., Huang, J., Cui, K., Nie, L., Xiang, J., Liu, X., Wu, W., Chen, M., Peng, S., 2012. Agronomic performance of high-yielding rice variety grown under alternate wetting and drying irrigation. Field Crops Research 126, 16-22.
  7. ↑ Tuong, T., Bouman, B., Mortimer, M., 2005. More rice, less water-integrated approaches for increasing water productivity in irrigated rice-based systems in Asia. Plant Prod. Sci 8, 231-241.
  8. 1 2 Yang, J., Liu, K., Wang, Z., Du, Y., Zhang, J., 2007. Water‐saving and high‐yielding irrigation for lowland rice by controlling limiting values of soil water potential. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 49, 1445-1454.
  9. ↑ Zhang, H., Zhang, S., Yang, J., Zhang, J., Wang, Z., 2008. Postanthesis moderate wetting drying improves both quality and quantity of rice yield. Agronomy Journal 100, 726-734.
  10. ↑ Lampayan, R.M., Rejesus, R.M., Singleton, G.R., Bouman, B.A., 2015. Adoption and economics of alternate wetting and drying water management for irrigated lowland rice. Field Crops Research 170, 95-108.
  11. ↑ "Alternate Wetting and Drying (AWD): A Water Saving Practice of Farm". Archived from the original on 2017-04-16.
  12. 1 2 Lagomarsino, A., Agnelli, A.E., Linquist, B., Adviento-Borbe, M.A., Agnelli, A., Gavina, G., Ravaglia, S., Ferrara, R.M., 2016. Alternate wetting and drying of rice reduced CH4 emissions but triggered N2O peaks in a clayey soil of central Italy. Pedosphere 26, 533-548.
  13. 1 2 Islam, S.F.U., de Neergaard, A., Sander, B.O., Jensen, L.S., Wassmann, R. and van Groenigen, J.W., 2020. Reducing greenhouse gas emissions and grain arsenic and lead levels without compromising yield in organically produced rice. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 295, p.106922.
  14. ↑ Islam, S.F.U., Sander, B.O., Quilty, J.R., de Neergaard, A., van Groenigen, J.W. and Jensen, L.S., 2020. Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions and reduced irrigation water use in rice production through water-saving irrigation scheduling, reduced tillage and fertiliser application strategies. Science of the Total Environment, p.140215.
  15. ↑ Price, A.H., Norton, G.J., Salt, D.E., Ebenhoeh, O., Meharg, A.A., Meharg, C., Islam, M.R., Sarma, R.N., Dasgupta, T., Ismail, A.M., 2013. Alternate wetting and drying irrigation for rice in Bangladesh: Is it sustainable and has plant breeding something to offer? Food and Energy Security 2, 120-129.
  16. ↑ Palis, F., Hossain, M., Bouman, B., Cenas, P., Lampayan, R., Lactaoen, A., Norte, T., Vicmudo, V., Castillo, G., 2005. A farmer participatory approach in the adaptation and adoption of controlled irrigation for saving water: a case study in Canarem, Victoria, Tarlac, Philippines. Copyright International Rice Research Institute 2005 14, 397.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.