In mathematics, a base-orderable matroid is a matroid that has the following additional property, related to the bases of the matroid.[1]
For any two bases and there exists a feasible exchange bijection, defined as a bijection from to , such that for every , both and are bases.
The property was introduced by Brualdi and Scrimger.[2][3] A strongly-base-orderable matroid has the following stronger property:
For any two bases and , there is a strong feasible exchange bijection, defined as a bijection from to , such that for every , both and are bases.
The property in context
Base-orderability imposes two requirements on the function :
- It should be a bijection;
- For every , both and should be bases.
Each of these properties alone is easy to satisfy:
- All bases of a given matroid have the same cardinality, so there are n! bijections between them (where n is the common size of the bases). But it is not guaranteed that one of these bijections satisfies property 2.
- All bases and of a matroid satisfy the symmetric basis exchange property, which is that for every , there exists some , such that both and are bases. However, it is not guaranteed that the resulting function f be a bijection - it is possible that several are matched to the same .
Matroids that are base-orderable
Every partition matroid is strongly base-orderable. Recall that a partition matroid is defined by a finite collection of categories, where each category has a capacity denoted by an integer with . A basis of this matroid is a set which contains exactly elements of each category . For any two bases and , every bijection mapping the elements of to the elements of is a strong feasible exchange bijection.
Every transversal matroid is strongly base-orderable.[2]
Matroids that are not base-orderable
Some matroids are not base-orderable. A notable example is the graphic matroid on the graph K4, i.e., the matroid whose bases are the spanning trees of the clique on 4 vertices.[1] Denote the vertices of K4 by 1,2,3,4, and its edges by 12,13,14,23,24,34. Note that the bases are:
- {12,13,14}, {12,13,24}, {12,13,34}; {12,14,23}, {12,14,34}; {12,23,24}, {12,23,34}; {12,24,34};
- {13,14,23}, {13,14,24}; {13,23,24}, {13,23,34}; {13,24,34};
- {14,23,24}, {14,23,34}; {14,24,34}.
Consider the two bases A = {12,23,34} and B = {13,14,24}, and suppose that there is a function f satisfying the exchange property (property 2 above). Then:
- f(12) must equal 14: it cannot be 24, since A \ {12} + {24} = {23,24,34} which is not a basis; it cannot be 13, since B \ {13} + {12} = {12,14,24} which is not a basis.
- f(34) must equal 14: it cannot be 24, since B \ {24} + {34} = {13,14,34} which is not a basis; it cannot be 13, since A \ {34} + {13} = {12,13,23} which is not a basis.
Then f is not a bijection - it maps two elements of A to the same element of B.
There are matroids that are base-orderable but not strongly-base-orderable.[4][1]
Properties
In base-orderable matroids, a feasible exchange bijection exists not only between bases but also between any two independent sets of the same cardinality, i.e., any two independent sets and such that .
This can be proved by induction on the difference between the size of the sets and the size of a basis (recall that all bases of a matroid have the same size). If the difference is 0 then the sets are actually bases, and the property follows from the definition of base-orderable matroids. Otherwise by the augmentation property of a matroid, we can augment to an independent set and augment to an independent set . Then, by the induction assumption there exists a feasible exchange bijection between and . If , then the restriction of to and is a feasible exchange bijection. Otherwise, and , so can be modified by setting: . Then, the restriction of the modified function to and is a feasible exchange bijection.
Completeness
The class of base-orderable matroids is complete. This means that it is closed under the operations of minors, duals, direct sums, truncations, and induction by directed graphs.[1]: 2 It is also closed under restriction, union and truncation.[5]: 410
The same is true for the class of strongly-base-orderable matroids.
References
- 1 2 3 4 Bonin, Joseph E.; Savitsky, Thomas J. (2016-01-01). "An infinite family of excluded minors for strong base-orderability". Linear Algebra and Its Applications. 488: 396–429. arXiv:1507.05521. doi:10.1016/j.laa.2015.09.055. ISSN 0024-3795. S2CID 119161534.
- Joseph E. Bonin; Thomas J. Savitsky (April 2016). "Excluded Minors for (Strongly) Base-Orderable Matroids" (PDF).
- 1 2 Brualdi, Richard A.; Scrimger, Edward B. (1968-11-01). "Exchange systems, matchings, and transversals". Journal of Combinatorial Theory. 5 (3): 244–257. doi:10.1016/S0021-9800(68)80071-7. ISSN 0021-9800.
- ↑ Brualdi, Richard A. (1969-08-01). "Comments on bases in dependence structures". Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society. 1 (2): 161–167. doi:10.1017/S000497270004140X. ISSN 1755-1633.
- ↑ A.W. Ingleton. "Non-base-orderable matroids". In Proceedings of the Fifth British Combinatorial Conference (Univ. Aberdeen, Aberdeen, 1975), pages 355–359. Congressus Numerantium, No. XV, Utilitas Math., Winnipeg, Man., 1976.
- ↑ Oxley, James G. (2006), Matroid Theory, Oxford Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 3, Oxford University Press, ISBN 9780199202508.