Battle of Dundalk Battle of Dundalk[1] | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Part of the Bruce campaign in Ireland | |||||||
| |||||||
Belligerents | |||||||
Kingdom of Scotland and Gaelic allies | Lordship of Ireland and Gaelic allies | ||||||
Commanders and leaders | |||||||
Edward Bruce † |
John de Bermingham Edmund Butler | ||||||
Strength | |||||||
2,000 and thousands of dispersed reinforcements | c. 20,000 | ||||||
Casualties and losses | |||||||
30 knights and more than 80 men-at-arms killed[2] | Light |
The Battle of Faughart (or Battle of Dundalk[3]) was fought on 14 October 1318 between an Anglo-Irish force led by John de Bermingham (later created 1st Earl of Louth) and Edmund Butler, Earl of Carrick, and a Scottish and Irish army commanded by Prince Edward Bruce, Earl of Carrick, brother of King Robert I of Scots ('Robert the Bruce'). It was a battle of the First War of Scottish Independence and more precisely the Irish Bruce Wars. The defeat and death of Bruce at the battle ended the attempt to revive the High Kingship of Ireland. It also ended, for the time being, King Robert's attempt to open up a second front against the English in the Wars of Scottish Independence.
A united Gaelic realm
Although King Robert's victory over King Edward II of England at the Battle of Bannockburn in 1314 had effectively secured the independence of the Kingdom of Scotland, it did not bring the Scots' war with England any closer to an end. Even repeated Scots raids into the northern counties of England had little effect on an English king seemingly blind to political and military realities. Something more decisive was needed to end the stalemate. It came in 1315 with an invitation from Ireland.
Since the time of Henry II (r. 1154–1189), the Kings of England had also claimed to be the Lords of Ireland. English settlers had taken root in Ireland, chiefly along the eastern seaboard, north and south of Dublin. But Gaelic-Irish kings and lords still enjoyed a large measure of autonomy, especially in the north and west, and English control was often of a fluctuating nature. In continuing the war with Scotland, Edward II had made heavy demands on the Irish, both for men and materials, pushing the country close to the point of financial ruin.
King Robert, who long maintained political and personal contacts with the aristocrats of Ulster, decided that Irish discontent could be usefully employed against his enemy. He sent envoys to the native Irish kings and clergy with letters invoking the common ancestry of the two nations, and offering to help them recover their liberty. Domnall Ó Neill, king of Tír Eoghain, responded, asking for aid against the English and offering the kingship of Ireland to King Robert's brother, Prince Edward Bruce, who was Earl of Carrick in the Peerage of Scotland. The Bruce brothers are believed to have been related by blood to the Ó Néill clan through their maternal line. In May 1315 Edward Bruce landed with an expeditionary force at Larne[4] near Carrickfergus Castle, ready to conjure up the spirit of "Gaelic internationalism".
High King
Bruce was joined by several local chieftains and gained some early successes against the Anglo-Irish aristocracy. He won his first engagement near Jonesborough in the Moyry Pass and sacked nearby Dundalk on 29 June. Bruce was able to exploit disputes between his two leading opponents—Richard de Burgh, Earl of Ulster, and Edmund Butler, Earl of Carrick in the Peerage of Ireland and Justiciar of Ireland, and defeat them piecemeal. De Burgh, King Robert's own father-in-law, was routed at the Battle of Connor in County Antrim on 10 September, and Butler at the Battle of Skerries in Kildare on 1 February 1316. Edward was then secure enough to proceed to Dundalk, where he was crowned High King on the hill of Maledon on 2 May 1316.
By the spring of 1316, it looked as if the Irish venture was to be a strategic success. It came, however, at the worst possible time. In Ireland, as elsewhere across much of Europe, the weather was so bad that the whole period was later likened to a mini ice-age. Historians refer to the "Great Famine of 1315–1317". Crops failed and people began to starve. Depending on local sources of supply, Bruce's campaigns began to resemble nothing more than large-scale plundering raids, carried out at the expense of an already desperate peasantry. In these circumstances it is hardly surprising that the supposed kinship of the Celts failed to materialise, and for most Irish the Scots were little better, if not worse, than the English settlers with whom they were familiar. A Connacht tract of this time refers to "Scottish foreigners less noble than our own foreigners". In the end, rather than acting as a true High King, Bruce could wield power in only parts of the north, and he was held there by problems of provisioning and supply. The opportunity to attempt an extension had to wait until 1318, when the weather, and the harvest, improved.
Faughart
Unfortunately, the sources provide little in the way of detail and background for the Battle of Faughart. According to John Barbour, the Scottish chronicler, Edward Bruce was the architect of his own defeat, deciding to engage a larger enemy force (20,000 strong in his account) without waiting for reinforcements from Scotland, a view which finds some support in the Annals of Clonmacnoise, where it is recorded that "anxious to obtain the victory for himself, he did not wait for his [Sir John Stewart's] brother." He took up position on the rising ground at Faughart, not far from Dundalk, on 14 October. When his Irish allies objected to facing a stronger enemy force in battle Bruce responded by placing them in the rear, close to the top of the hill, leaving some 2000 Scots troops to face the enemy onslaught.
In contrast to Barbour, the Lanercost Chronicle, the chief English source, says that Bruce approached Dundalk "with a great army of Scots which had already arrived in Ireland." It would seem that the three English commanders—John de Bermingham, Edmund, Lord Carrick, and Roland Joyce, Archbishop of Armagh—were themselves attacked, though in a somewhat impetuous and haphazard fashion. Lanercost gives by far the clearest description of the action that followed:
The Scots were in three columns at such a distance from each other that the first was done with before the second came up, and then the second before the third, with which Edward was marching could render any aid. Thus the third column was routed just as the two preceding ones had been. Edward fell at the same time and was beheaded after death; his body being divided into four quarters, which were sent to the four chief quarters of Ireland
We have no precise figures for the number slain, though it is known that thirty Scottish knights and more than eighty men-at-arms died.[2] The dead included a Mac Ruaidhrí ("King of the Hebrides") and a Mac Domhnaill ("King of Argyll").[note 1] This would suggest that most, if not all, of the Scottish force was drawn from the Gaels of the Western Isles and from Bruce's own earldom of Carrick in Ayrshire. Defeat was followed by the almost complete collapse of the Scottish position in Ulster: Carrickfergus castle was recaptured on 2 December. John de Bermingham received most of the credit for the victory, and was created Earl of Louth by a grateful King of England. It was not to be the end of Scottish involvement in Ireland; but there were to be no more high kings.
While in some ways a failure, the Scottish adventure in Ireland did serve the purpose of Scotland's King Robert the Bruce, as never again were the English able to use a base in Ireland to mount an attack on the western seaboard of Scotland.[5]
Notes
- ↑ The identity of these men is uncertain, although they seem to have been leading members of Clann Ruaidhrí and Clann Domhnaill.
Sources
Primary
- Annals of Clonmacnoise, translated by Connell MacGeoghegan (1627), ed. Denis Murphy (1896). The Annals of Clonmacnoise. Dublin: Royal Society of Antiquaries of Ireland.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: postscript (link) - Annals of Loch Cé, ed. and tr. W. M. Hennessy (1871). The Annals of Loch Cé. Rolls Series 54. 2 vols. Dublin.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) (Available from CELT: Edition and translation of vol. 1 (s.a. 1014-1348); Edition and translation of vol. 2 (s.a. 1349-1590)) - Barbour, John, The Bruce, ed. A.A.M. Duncan, 1964
- The Lanercost Chronicle. ed. H. Maxwell, 1913
Secondary
- McNamee, C., The Wars of the Bruces. Scotland, England Ireland, 1306–1328, 1997
- Sayles, G.O. The Battle of Faughart, in Robert Bruce's Irish Wars, ed. S. Duffy, 2002
- Scott, Raold McNair Robert the Bruce, King of the Scots, 1987
References
- ↑ D'Alton, John (1845). The history of Ireland: from the earliest period to the year 1245, Vol II. Published by the author. p. 49.
- 1 2 Bruce G. & Harbottle T.B. (1971) Harbottle's Dictionary of Battles (revised edition), Hart-Davis McGibbon Ltd.; Granada Publishing, London, 1979: 303 pp.
- ↑ D'Alton, John (1845). The history of Ireland: from the earliest period to the year 1245, Vol II page 49 "...popularly called the battle of Dundalk...". Published by the author. p. 49.
- ↑
Smith, Brendan; Bartlett, Thomas, eds. (2018). The Cambridge History of Ireland. Vol. 1: 600–1550. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9781108564625. Retrieved 20 June 2022.
King Robert (Bruce) had sent insinuating propagandists into [Ulster] even before his brother Edward had landed a Scots army at Larne in May 1315 [...].
- ↑ McNair Scott, Ronald (1982). Robert the Bruce, King of the Scots. Basic Books. p. 189. ISBN 9780786703296.