In the Phillips catalyst, used for about half of the industrial production of polyethylene, the chromium catalyst is supported on silica.

In chemistry, a catalyst support is a material, usually a solid with a high surface area, to which a catalyst is affixed.[1] The activity of heterogeneous catalysts is mainly promoted by atoms present at the accessible surface of the material. Consequently, great effort is made to maximize the specific surface area of a catalyst. One popular method for increasing surface area involves distributing the catalyst over the surface of the support. The support may be inert or participate in the catalytic reactions. Typical supports include various kinds of activated carbon, alumina, and silica.[2]

Applying catalysts to supports

Two main methods are used to prepare supported catalysts. In the impregnation method, a suspension of the solid support is treated with a solution of a precatalyst, and the resulting material is then activated under conditions that will convert the precatalyst (often a metal salt) to a more active state, perhaps the metal itself. In such cases, the catalyst support is usually in the form of pellets. Alternatively, supported catalysts can be prepared from homogeneous solution by co-precipitation. For example, an acidic solution of aluminium salts and precatalyst are treated with base to precipitate the mixed hydroxide, which is subsequently calcined.[3]

Supports are usually thermally very stable and withstand processes required to activate precatalysts. For example, many precatalysts are activated by exposure to a stream of hydrogen at high temperatures. Similarly, catalysts become fouled after extended use, and in such cases they are sometimes re-activated by oxidation-reduction cycles, again at high temperatures. The Phillips catalyst, consisting of chromium oxide supported on silica, is activated by a stream of hot air.[4]

Spillover

Supports are often viewed as inert: catalysis occurs at the catalytic "islands" and the support exists to provide high surface areas. Various experiments indicate that this model is often oversimplified. It is known for example that adsorbates, such as hydrogen and oxygen, can interact with and even migrate from island to island across the support without re-entering the gas phase. This process where adsorbates migrate to and from the support is called spillover. It is envisaged, for example, that hydrogen can "spill" onto oxidic support as hydroxy groups.[5]

Catalyst leaching

A common problem in heterogeneous catalysis is leaching, a form of deactivation where active species on the surface of a solid catalyst are lost in the liquid phase. Leaching is detrimental for environmental and commercial reasons, and must be taken into consideration if a catalyst is to be used for extended periods of time. If the binding interactions between a catalyst and its support are too weak, leaching will be exacerbated, and its activity will decrease after extended use. For electrophilic catalysts, leaching may be addressed by choosing a more basic support.[6] As this strategy may negatively affect the activity of the catalyst, a subtle balance between leaching mitigation and activity is required.[7]

Strong metal-support interaction

Strong metal-support interaction is another case highlighting the oversimplification that heterogeneous catalysts are merely supported on an inert substance. The original evidence was provided by the finding that particles of platinum bind H2 with the stoichiometry PtH2 for each surface atom regardless of whether the platinum is supported or not. When, however, supported on titanium dioxide, Pt no longer binds with H2 with the same stoichiometry. This difference is attributed to the electronic influence of the titania on the platinum, otherwise called strong metal-support interaction.[8]

Heterogenized molecular catalysis

Molecular catalysts, consisting of transition metal complexes, have been immobilized on catalyst supports. The resulting material in principle combines features of both homogeneous catalysts – well defined metal complex structures – with the advantages of heterogeneous catalysts – recoverability and ease of handling. Many modalities have been developed for attaching metal complex catalysts to a support. However, the technique has not proven commercially viable, usually because the heterogenized transition metal complexes are leached from, or deactivated by, the support.[9]

Supports for electrocatalysis

Supports are used to give mechanical stability to catalyst nanoparticles or powders. Supports immobilize the particle reducing its mobility and favouring the chemical stabilization: they can be considered as solid capping agents. Supports also allow the nanoparticles to be easily recycled.[10]

One of the most promising supports is graphene for its porosity, electronic properties, thermal stability and active surface area.

Examples

Ceramic-core converter of the type found in many automotive catalytic converters.

Almost all major heterogeneous catalysts are supported as illustrated in the table hereafter.

Process Reactants, product(s) Catalyst Support
Ammonia synthesis (Haber–Bosch process) N2 + H2, NH3 iron oxides alumina
Hydrogen production by Steam reforming CH4 + H2O, H2 + CO nickel K2O
Ethylene oxide synthesis C2H4 + O2, C2H4O silver with many promoters alumina
Ziegler–Natta polymerization of ethylene propylene, polypropylene; ethylene, polyethylene TiCl3 MgCl2
Desulfurization of petroleum (hydrodesulfurization) H2 + organosulfur compounds, RH + H2S Mo-Co alumina

See also

  • Fluidized bed reactor – Reactor carrying multiphase chemical reactions with solid particles suspended in an ascending fluid

References

  1. IUPAC Gold Book.
  2. Ma, Zhen; Zaera, Francisco (2006). "Heterogeneous Catalysis by Metals". In: Encyclopedia of Inorganic Chemistry, John Wiley. doi:10.1002/0470862106.ia084
  3. Hudson, L. Keith; Misra, Chanakya; Perrotta, Anthony J.; Wefers, Karl; Williams, F. S. (2002). "Aluminum Oxide". Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH. doi:10.1002/14356007.a01_557. ISBN 978-3527306732..
  4. McDaniel, Max P. (2010). A Review of the Phillips Supported Chromium Catalyst and Its Commercial Use for Ethylene Polymerization. Advances in Catalysis. Vol. 53. pp. 123–606. doi:10.1016/S0360-0564(10)53003-7. ISBN 9780123808523.
  5. Conner, W. Curtis.; Falconer, John L. (1995). "Spillover in Heterogeneous Catalysis". Chemical Reviews. 95 (3): 759–788. doi:10.1021/cr00035a014.
  6. Aboelfetoh, Eman Fahmy; Fechtelkord, Michael; Pietschnig, Rudolf (2010). "Structure and catalytic properties of MgO-supported vanadium oxide in the selective oxidation of cyclohexane". Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical. 318 (1–2): 51–59. doi:10.1016/j.molcata.2009.11.007.
  7. Aboelfetoh, Eman Fahmy; Pietschnig, Rudolf (2014). "Preparation, Characterization and Catalytic Activity of MgO/SiO2 Supported Vanadium Oxide Based Catalysts". Catalysis Letters. 144: 97–103. doi:10.1007/s10562-013-1098-z. S2CID 95557262.
  8. Tauster, S. J. (1987). "Strong metal-support interactions". Accounts of Chemical Research. 20 (11): 389–394. doi:10.1021/ar00143a001.
  9. Hübner, Sandra; De Vries, Johannes G.; Farina, Vittorio (2016). "Why Does Industry Not Use Immobilized Transition Metal Complexes as Catalysts?". Advanced Synthesis & Catalysis. 358: 3–25. doi:10.1002/adsc.201500846.
  10. Hu, H.; Xin, J.H.; Hu, H.; Wang, X.; Miao, D.; Liu, Y. (2015). "Synthesis and stabilization of metal nanocatalysts for reduction reactions – a review". Journal of Materials Chemistry. 3 (21): 11157–11182. doi:10.1039/C5TA00753D. hdl:10397/8849.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.