Country of origin labelling for a product designed in the United States and manufactured in China.

Diagonal cumulation is a rules of origin (RoO) provision in international trade whereby products from one country of origin can have value added to it in another as if it were native to that country. It includes the provisions from bilateral cumulation and exists between countries with identical cumulation provisions, even if they are in separate free trade agreements (FTAs).[1][2]

The pan-Euro-Mediterranean cumulation system was introduced in the European Union in 1997 and allows for countries to cumulate stages of production without sacrificing their preferential access to EU markets.[3] As with all preferential regimes, firms are thus able to utilise intermediate goods from countries with the same rules of origin and cumulation. This is understood to have fundamentally reorganised procurement strategies in peripheral countries.[2]

Originating

The EU defines originating products by where it is wholly obtained or produced, or where they were sufficiently worked.[4][5] 'Sufficiently worked' means having been processed or manufactured to an extent which allows for the retention of originating status: for instance, sweetened or flavoured water must have all fruit juice, except grapefruit, lime or pineapple, originate from the EU.[6] Products which do not fulfil these definitions or have an unknown origin are not subject to the provisioned preferential treatment or tariffs.[7]

Proof of origin status is proved by a EUR-MED or EUR.1 movement certificate from the exporting country or an invoice declaration by an approved exporter for products under €6000 in value.

EU

Union for the Mediterranean member states:
  Non-EU members
  Suspended members
  Observers

Countries party to the pan-Euro-Mediterranean system are EU member states and the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) states, Turkey, members of the Union for the Mediterranean, the Western Balkans (parties to the EU's Stabilisation and Association Process; Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo, Montenegro, North Macedonia and Serbia) and the Faroe Islands (an autonomous territory of EU member Denmark).[3][8][9] The entire area is covered by bilateral cumulation, but not necessarily diagonal cumulation (see below).

The World Trade Organization lists the EU (EBA) as the sole member offering diagonal cumulation; parties to the African Growth and Opportunity Act, Canada, the Eurasian Customs Union, Japan and the United States offer the more liberal free cumulation, while China, India and South Korea do not offer any cumulation.[10]

Cumulation is one of the common provisions of the European Union Customs Union. Bilateral cumulation is defined as a product originating in one country being processed in another, and then adopting the origin of the second country. Crucially, they do not have to be considered 'sufficiently worked' in order to retain originating status. Diagonal cumulation can include products from more than two preferential countries.[1]

Some products in Andorra and San Marino are also under diagonal cumulation. Furthermore, full cumulation is in place between the European Economic Area, which includes Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway, and Algeria, Morocco and Tunisia.[3] Full cumulation only requires products be 'sufficiently worked' before becoming originating, even for products which were initially non-originating.[1]

Applicability of diagonal cumulation (1 August 2021)[9]
European Union Switzerland and Liechtenstein Iceland Norway Faroe Islands (Denmark) Algeria Egypt Israel Jordan Lebanon Morocco West Bank and Gaza Strip Syria Tunisia Turkey Albania Bosnia and Herzegovina Kosovo Montenegro North Macedonia Serbia Moldova Georgia Ukraine
EU N/A Yes, from 1/1/06 Yes, from 1/1/06 Yes, from 1/1/06 Yes, from 1/12/05 Yes, from 1/11/07 Yes, from 1/3/06 Yes, from 1/1/06 Yes, from 1/7/06 No Yes, from 1/12/05 Yes, from 1/7/09 No Yes, from 1/8/06 Partially Yes, from 1/1/07 Yes, from 1/7/08 Yes, from 1/4/16 Yes, from 1/1/08 Yes, from 1/1/07 Yes, from 8/12/09 Yes, from 1/12/16 Yes, from 1/6/18 Yes, from 1/1/19
Switzerland, Liechtenstein Yes, from 1/1/06 N/A Yes, from 1/8/05 Yes, from 1/8/05 Yes, from 1/1/06 No Yes, from 1/8/07 Yes, from 1/7/05 Yes, from 17/7/07 Yes, from 1/1/07 Yes, from 1/3/05 Yes, from 1/5/16 No Yes, from 1/6/05 Yes, from 1/9/07 Yes, from 1/5/15 Yes, from 1/1/15 No Yes, from 1/9/12 Yes, from 1/2/16 Yes, from 1/5/15 No Yes, from 1/5/18 Yes, from 1/6/12
Iceland Yes, from 1/1/06 Yes, from 1/8/05 N/A Yes, from 1/8/05 Yes, from 1/11/05 No Yes, from 1/8/07 Yes, from 1/7/05 Yes, from 17/7/07 Yes, from 1/1/07 Yes, from 1/3/05 Yes, from 1/5/16 No Yes, from 1/3/06 Yes, from 1/9/07 Yes, from 1/5/15 Yes, from 1/1/15 No Yes, from 1/10/12 Yes, from 1/5/15 Yes, from 1/5/15 No Yes, from 1/9/17 Yes, from 1/6/12
Norway Yes, from 1/1/06 Yes, from 1/8/05 Yes, from 1/8/05 N/A Yes, from 1/12/05 No Yes, from 1/8/07 Yes, from 1/7/05 Yes, from 17/7/07 Yes, from 1/1/07 Yes, from 1/3/05 Yes, from 1/5/16 No Yes, from 1/8/05 Yes, from 1/9/07 Yes, from 1/5/15 Yes, from 1/1/15 No Yes, from 1/11/12 Yes, from 1/5/15 Yes, from 1/5/15 No Yes, from 1/9/17 Yes, from 1/6/12
Faroe Islands (Denmark) Yes, from 1/12/05 Yes, from 1/1/06 Yes, from 1/11/05 Yes, from 1/12/05 N/A No No No No No No No No No Yes, from 1/9/07 No No No No No No No No No
Algeria Yes, from 1/11/07 No No No No N/A No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No
Egypt Yes, from 1/3/06 Yes, from 1/8/07 Yes, from 1/8/07 Yes, from 1/8/07 No No N/A No Yes, from 6/7/06 No Yes, from 6/7/06 No No Yes, from 6/7/06 Yes, from 1/3/07 No No No No No No No No No
Israel Yes, from 1/1/06 Yes, from 1/7/05 Yes, from 1/7/05 Yes, from 1/7/05 No No No N/A Yes, from 9/2/06 No No No No No Yes, from 1/3/06 No No No No No No No No No
Jordan Yes, from 1/7/06 Yes, from 17/7/07 Yes, from 17/7/07 Yes, from 17/7/07 No No No No N/A No Yes, from 6/7/06 No No Yes, from 6/7/06 No No No No No No No No No No
Lebanon No Yes, from 1/1/07 Yes, from 1/1/07 Yes, from 1/1/07 No No No No No N/A No No No No No No No No No No No No No No
Morocco Yes, from 1/12/05 Yes, from 1/3/05 Yes, from 1/3/05 Yes, from 1/3/05 No No Yes, from 6/7/06 No Yes, from 6/7/06 No N/A No No Yes, from 6/7/06 Yes, from 1/12/06 No No No No No No No No No
West Bank, Gaza Strip Yes, from 1/7/09 Yes, from 1/5/16 Yes, from 1/5/16 Yes, from 1/5/16 No No No No No No No N/A No No Yes, from 26/3/21 No No No No No No No No No
Syria No No No No No No No No No No No No N/A No Yes, from 1/1/07 No No No No No No No No No
Tunisia Yes, from 1/8/06 Yes, from 1/6/05 Yes, from 1/3/06 Yes, from 1/8/05 No No Yes, from 6/7/06 No Yes, from 6/7/06 No Yes, from 6/7/06 No No N/A Yes, from 1/7/05 No No No No No No No No No
Turkey Partially Yes, from 1/9/07 Yes, from 1/9/07 Yes, from 1/9/07 Yes, from 1/9/07 No Yes, from 1/3/07 Yes, from 1/3/06 No No Yes, from 1/12/06 Yes, from 26/3/21 Yes, from 1/1/07 Yes, from 1/7/05 N/A Yes, from 1/8/11 Yes, from 14/12/11 Yes, from 1/9/19 Yes, from 1/3/10 Yes, from 1/7/09 Yes, from 1/9/10 Yes, from 1/10/17 Yes, from 29/4/21 No
Albania Yes, from 1/1/07 Yes, from 1/5/15 Yes, from 1/5/15 Yes, from 1/5/15 No No No No No No No No No No Yes, from 1/8/11 N/A Yes, from 22/11/07 Yes, from 1/4/14 Yes, from 26/7/2007 Yes, from 26/7/2007 Yes, from 24/10/07 Yes, from 1/4/14 No No
Bosnia & Herzegovina Yes, from 1/7//08 Yes, from 1/1/15 Yes, from 1/1/15 Yes, from 1/1/15 No No No No No No No No No No Yes, from 14/12/11 Yes, from 22/11/07 N/A Yes, from 1/4/14 Yes, from 22/11/07 Yes, from 22/11/07 Yes, from 22/11/07 Yes, from 1/4/14 No No
Kosovo Yes, from 1/4/16 No No No No No No No No No No No No Yes, from 1/9/19 Yes, from 1/9/19 Yes, from 1/4/14 Yes, from 1/4/14 N/A Yes, from 1/4/14 Yes, from 1/4/14 Yes, from 1/4/14 Yes, from 1/4/14 No No
Montenegro Yes, from 1/1/08 Yes, from 1/9/12 Yes, from 1/10/12 Yes, from 1/11/12 No No No No No No No No No No Yes, from 1/3/10 Yes, from 26/7/2007 Yes, from 22/11/07 Yes, from 1/4/14 N/A Yes, from 26/7/07 Yes, from 24/10/07 Yes, from 1/4/14 No No
North Macedonia Yes, from 1/1/07 Yes, from 1/2/16 Yes, from 1/5/15 Yes, from 1/5/15 No No No No No No No No No No Yes, from 1/7/09 Yes, from 26/7/2007 Yes, from 22/11/07 Yes, from 1/4/14 Yes, from 26/7/07 N/A Yes, from 24/10/07 Yes, from 1/4/14 No No
Serbia Yes, from 8/12/09 Yes, from 1/5/15 Yes, from 1/5/15 Yes, from 1/5/15 No No No No No No No No No No Yes, from 1/9/10 Yes, from 24/10/07 Yes, from 22/11/07 Yes, from 1/4/14 Yes, from 24/10/07 Yes, from 24/10/07 N/A Yes, from 1/4/14 No No
Moldova Yes, from 1/12/16 No No No No No No No No No No No No No Yes, from 1/10/17 Yes, from 1/4/14 Yes, from 1/4/14 Yes, from 1/4/14 Yes, from 1/4/14 Yes, from 1/4/14 Yes, from 1/4/14 N/A No No
Georgia Yes, from 1/6/18 Yes, from 1/5/18 Yes, from 1/9/17 Yes, from 1/9/17 No No No No No No No No No No Yes, from 29/4/21 No No No No No No No N/A Yes, from 26/3/20
Ukraine Yes, from 1/1/19 Yes, from 1/6/12 Yes, from 1/6/12 Yes, from 1/6/12 No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No Yes, from 26/3/20 N/A

Brexit negotiations

Trade provisions of post-Brexit UK-EU relations are governed by the EU–UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement after the UK left the EU on 1 February 2020 and the transition period on 31 December. During the transition 'implementation period', the UK remained part of the European Single Market and Customs Union. Both the UK and EU agreed during Brexit negotiations there should be less restrictive RoOs, and a future relationship modelled after existing EU FTAs, such as those with Canada and Japan.[11]

In 2021, the European Union Committee of the House of Lords recommended the UK Government "make full use of the Trade Specialised Committee on Customs Cooperation and Rules of Origin to ensure consistency in implementation across the UK and EU". It pushed for full diagonal cumulation with the EU: a letter by the Lord Goldsmith wrote its loss would lead to "instances where using a UK supplier will mean the EU company losing preferential access for its exports. In those cases, the UK company will likely become less attractive as a supplier and may lose its place in the supply chain"—however, EU officials said the UK "needs to sell any potential enhanced improvements to the rules of origin on the basis of mutual interest with the EU."[12]

EU documents authorising Brexit talks emphasised ensuring "the protection of the Union’s financial interests and reflect the United Kingdom’s status as a non-Schengen third country that cannot have the same rights and enjoy the same benefits as a member."[13] The EU calculated that, in 2020, trade liberalisation through unrestrictive RoOs would benefit the UK more than the EU.[11]

Impact

Restrictive RoOs have a negative impact on trade: a 2008 paper found an increase led to a 0.4% decrease in international trade. Following FTAs, a reorganisation in production was observed as the pre-2004 EU 15 shifted the intermediate stage of production onto peripheral partners.[14] The pan-European system that began in 1997 allowed for cumulation to divide production into global value chains as exports are now largely of unfinished goods between production sites (66% worldwide in 2009); diagonal cumulation thus reduces the restrictiveness of RoOs as exporters take advantage of preferential access, increasing the trade volume between EU and peripheral partners.[2]

Worldwide, it was found between 154 countries from 1980 to 2005 that diagonal cumulation creates 16% more intra-bloc trade while diverting 16% of extra-bloc trade. Full cumulation creates the most intra-bloc trade (35.8%) and diverts the least away from members to non-members (3.1%). Bilateral cumulation alone generates a statistically insignificant percentage of trade (0.9%) while diverting 9% away.[15]

References

  1. 1 2 3 "Common provisions". ec.europa.eu. Archived from the original on 2022-03-07. Retrieved 2022-03-19.
  2. 1 2 3 Bombarda, Pamela; Gamberoni, Elisa (June 2019). "Diagonal Cumulation and Sourcing Decisions" (PDF). World Bank Group. Archived (PDF) from the original on 19 March 2022. Retrieved 19 March 2022.
  3. 1 2 3 "The pan-Euro-Mediterranean cumulation and the PEM Convention". ec.europa.eu. Archived from the original on 2022-03-07. Retrieved 2022-03-19.
  4. ↑ "Originating". Directorate-General for Trade. Archived from the original on 7 January 2022. Retrieved 19 March 2022.
  5. ↑ "Wholly obtained". Directorate-General for Trade. Archived from the original on 8 January 2022. Retrieved 19 March 2022.
  6. ↑ "List Rules". ec.europa.eu. Archived from the original on 2022-03-19. Retrieved 2022-03-19.
  7. ↑ "Non-originating materials". Directorate-General for Trade. Archived from the original on 2022-01-28. Retrieved 2022-03-19.
  8. ↑ "Western Balkans". European Commission. Archived from the original on 9 March 2022. Retrieved 19 March 2022.
  9. 1 2 "Commission notice concerning the application of the Regional Convention on pan-Euro-Mediterranean preferential rules of origin or the protocols on rules of origin providing for diagonal cumulation between the Contracting Parties to this Convention". Official Journal of the European Union. 15 October 2021. Archived from the original on 21 January 2022. Retrieved 19 March 2022.
  10. ↑ "Committee on Rules of Origin: Cumulation (Paragraph 1.7 of the Decision)" (PDF). World Trade Organization. Retrieved 14 April 2022.
  11. 1 2 Hallak, Issam (April 2020). "Future EU-UK trade relationship: Rules of origin" (PDF). European Parliament. Archived (PDF) from the original on 7 March 2022. Retrieved 19 March 2022.
  12. ↑ "Chapter 3: Rules of origin". 25 March 2021. Retrieved 19 March 2022.
  13. ↑ "Recommendation for a Council Decision authorising the opening of negotiations for a new partnership with the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland". European Commission. 3 February 2020. Archived from the original on 19 March 2022. Retrieved 19 March 2022.
  14. ↑ Bombarda, Pamela; Gamberoni, Elisa (September 2008). "Firm Heterogeneity, Rules of Origin and Rules of Cumulation" (PDF). Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2022-03-03. Retrieved 2022-03-19.
  15. ↑ Park, Innwon; Park, Soonchan (14 January 2009). "Consolidation and Harmonization of Regional Trade Agreements (RTAs): A Path Toward Global Free Trade" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 5 July 2017. Retrieved 19 March 2022 – via Munich Personal RePEc Archive.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.