Iran-Iraq-Syria pipeline
Location
CountryIran, Iraq, Syria[1]
General directioneast–west
FromAsaluyeh, Iran
Passes throughDamascus, Syria
General information
TypeNatural gas
Technical information
Length5,600 km (3,500 mi)
Maximum discharge110 million cubic metres of natural gas per day[1]
Diameter56 in (1,422 mm)

The Iran–Iraq–Syria pipeline (called the Friendship Pipeline by the governments involved and the Islamic gas pipeline by some Western sources[2]) is a proposed natural gas pipeline running from the Iranian South Pars/North Dome Gas-Condensate field towards Europe via Iran, Iraq, Syria and Lebanon to supply European customers as well as Iraq, Syria and Lebanon.[1] The pipeline was planned to be 5,600 km (3,500 mi) long and have a diameter of 142 centimetres (56 in).[1] A previous proposal, known as the Persian Pipeline, had seen a route from Iran's South Pars to Europe via Turkey; it was apparently abandoned after the Swiss energy company Elektrizitätsgesellschaft Laufenburg halted its contract with Iran in October 2010 in the face of pressure over U.S. sanctions against Iran.[3][4]

Iraq signed an agreement with Iran in June 2013 to receive natural gas to fuel Iraqi power plants in Baghdad and Diyala. The contract covers 40 million m3 (1.4 billion cu ft) per day over 10 years. Iran's plans to export 5.0 million m3 (176 million cu ft) of gas per day at standard conditions to Iraq by 2015.[5]

In July 2011 Iran, Iraq and Syria said they planned to sign a contract potentially worth around $6bn to construct a pipeline running from South Pars towards Europe, via these countries and Lebanon and then under the Mediterranean to a European country, with a refinery and related infrastructure in Damascus.[1][6][7][8] In November 2012 the United States dismissed reports that construction had begun on the pipeline, saying that this had been claimed repeatedly and that "it never seems to materialize."[9] A framework agreement was to be signed in early 2013, with costs now estimated at $10bn;[10] construction plans were delayed by the Syrian civil war.[11] In December 2012 the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies said that the project "remains doubtful. It is not clear how such a project will be financed given that both Iran and Syria are subject to strict financial sanctions."[12] In July 2015, Iranian Gas Engineering and Development Company (IGEDC) and Pasargad Energy Development Company signed a BOT (build-operate-transfer) contract under which the project owner will provide 25% of finance and National Development Fund of Iran the rest for the construction of IGAT-6.

The pipeline would be a competitor to the Nabucco pipeline from Azerbaijan to Europe.[1] It is also an alternative to the Qatar–Turkey pipeline which had been proposed by Qatar to run from Qatar to Europe via Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Syria and Turkey.[13] Syria's rationale for rejecting the Qatar proposal was said to be "to protect the interests of [its] Russian ally, which is Europe's top supplier of natural gas."[13]

See also

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 UPI, 25 July 2011, 'Islamic pipeline' seeks Euro gas markets
  2. ↑ naturalgaseurope.com, 11 February 2013, Some Reasons to Materialize Iran, Iraq, and Syria's Gas Pipeline
  3. ↑ SRF Tagesschau, 29 October 2010, EG Laufenburg legt Gas-Deal mit Iran auf Eis
  4. ↑ Jerusalem Post, 26 January 2011, Swiss adopt EU sanctions on Teheran
  5. ↑ "International – U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)".
  6. ↑ Mansour Kashfi, Asia Times Online, 7 June 2012, Iran's Islamic pipeline a mad man's dream
  7. ↑ Iran, Syria Finalize Agreement on New Gas Pipeline
  8. ↑ Wall Street Journal, 25 July 2011, Iraq, Iran, Syria Sign $10 Billion Gas-Pipeline Deal
  9. ↑ UPI, 20 November 2012, U.S. brushes off Iran-Iraq-Syria gas line
  10. ↑ Agence France-Presse, Hürriyet Daily News, 19 February 2013, Iraq greenlights gas pipeline deal with Iran, Syria
  11. ↑ Christian Science Monitor, 27 August 2013, US destroyers near Syria. Oil market likely to shrug off a strike.
  12. ↑ Hakim Darbouche, Laura El-Katiri and Bassam Fattouh (2012), Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, East Mediterranean Gas: what kind of a game-changer?, NG17, December 2012, p17
  13. 1 2 Nafeez Ahmed, The Guardian, 30 August 2013, Syria intervention plan fueled by oil interests, not chemical weapon concern
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.