Lawyers in Singapore are part of a fused profession, meaning that they may act as both a solicitor and as an advocate, although lawyers usually specialise in one of litigation, conveyancing or corporate law.[1]

Demographics

In 2023, there were a total of 6,512 practising lawyers in Singapore,of whom 3,677 were male and 2,835 were female.[2]

Year Number of practising lawyers Remarks
2002 4000 [3]
2007 4200 [3]
2012 5200 [3]
2019 5920
2020 5955
2021 6333
2022 6237
2023 6512 [2]

Registered foreign lawyers

In July 2009, there were 95 foreign firms with offices in Singapore, and 840 foreign lawyers, up from 576 in 2000.[4][5] Six international firms were given a licence to practice local corporate law for the first time in December 2008.[6]

Law firms in Singapore

The Big Four law firms in Singapore are generally regarded to be Allen & Gledhill, Rajah & Tann, WongPartnership and Drew & Napier.[7] In addition, Dentons Rodyk & Davidson has in recent years been described as a "Big Five" law firm. This description has appeared most frequently in private legal ranking directories and on two occasions in The Straits Times.[8][9][10]

Ranking by scale

The following table ranks, by size, the largest 20 domestic and international law firms with at least one office situated in Singapore in 2022.[11]

2022 rank Name Headquarter(s) Total number of partners Total number of associates Total number of lawyers Remarks
1 Allen & Gledhill Singapore 151 272 420 Domestic with regional legal network
2 Rajah & Tann Singapore 157 170 332 Domestic with regional legal network
3 WongPartnership Singapore 117 215 332 Domestic with regional legal network
4 Drew & Napier Singapore 114 154 331 Domestic with regional legal network
5 Dentons Rodyk & Davidson Singapore for local entity; Polycentric for Dentons 93 84 179 Swiss Verein
6 Shook Lin & Bok Singapore 61 80 141 Domestic
7 Baker & McKenzie Wong & Leow Singapore for local entity; Chicago for Baker McKenzie 33 83 134 International & Swiss Verein
8 Withers KhattarWong London 32 63 95 International
9 Clifford Chance London 20 61 87 Magic Circle
10 Harry Elias Partnership Singapore 24 54 78 Domestic
11 Allen & Overy London 15 58 75 Magic Circle
12 Stephenson Harwood (Singapore) Alliance with Virtus Law LLP London 21 46 67 International
13 Norton Rose Fulbright London 15 46 61 International & Swiss Verein
14 RHTLaw Asia Singapore 23 23 58 Domestic with regional legal network
15 Bird & Bird ATMD Singapore for local entity; London for Bird & Bird 14 36 50 International
16 Oon & Bazul Singapore 19 29 48 Domestic
17 K&L Gates Straits Law Singapore for local entity; Pittsburgh for K&L Gates 16 24 48 International
18 Herbert Smith Freehills London & Sydney 14 15 47 International
19 White & Case New York City 14 31 45 International
20 Ashurst London 15 25 40 International

Education and training

Replacement of pupillage system

In 2009, Parliament approved changes to replace the 'pupillage' system with structured training, and to make it easier for lawyers to return to practice.[12]

Decoupling admission to the Bar from practising certificate

In August 2016, Chief Justice Sundaresh Menon established a Committee for the Professional Training of Lawyers (CPTL) to conduct a "root-and-branch" review of the professional training regime for lawyers in Singapore and to make recommendations on how it might be improved to raise the quality and consistency of training standards.[13]

On 29 March 2018, the CPTL released its report, which included three key recommendations: (a) decouple admission to the Bar from the right to practise law; (b) raise the standard and stringency of the Part B examinations; and (c) lengthen the practice training period from six months to a year. The CTPL also made various other specific recommendations.[14]

In August 2018, MinLaw announced that it had accepted the CTPL's recommendations in principle and that the changes would be implemented from the 2023 session of the Part B examinations onwards.[15]

MinLaw conducted a public consultation on the CTPL's proposals from 15 November 2019 to 27 December 2019.[13]

On 27 February 2023, it was announced that the implementation of the new professional training regime based on the CTPL's recommendations would be deferred and would only apply from the 2024 session of the Part B examinations onwards. According to MinLaw, the deferment was on account of feedback from the legal industry to the effect that more time was required to adapt to the recommended changes, taking into account the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.[16] For example, according to Gregory Vijayendran, the doubling of the practice training period would in effect double the cumulative allowance that needed to be paid to trainees. Ng Wai King also explained that law firms needed more time to review their human capital needs and rethink their training requirements.[17]

On 3 October 2023, the Ministry of Law introduced the Legal Profession (Amendment) Bill in Parliament to implement the changes.[18]

In November 2023, the Legal Profession (Amendment) Act was passed by Parliament.

Controversy regarding the lengthening of the training period

The lengthening of the statutory practice training period from six months to a year has drawn mixed reactions. During the Parliamentary debate on the legislative amendments required to lengthen the training period, various Members of Parliament expressed concerns about fair remuneration and benefits such as paid sick leave, in light of the lengthened training period.

NTUC Assistant Secretary-General Patrick Tay drew attention to the adverse financial impact on trainees, noting that trainee lawyers typically work long hours and are paid honoraria of between SGD 1,000 to SGD 2,500 a month, which is substantially lower than their peers in other industries, who typically earn between SGD 3,500 to SGD 5,000 a month. Tay stated that this "can be seen as exploitative" and noted that this may disproportionately impact trainees from lower-income backgrounds, who may need a reasonable income during their training period to support their families. He also called for trainees to be entitled to "basic employment rights", such as paid annual and sick leave, as "everyone falls ill".[19]

Yip Hon Weng suggested mandating a minimum wage for trainees, similar to what housemen are paid in the medical field. It was also noted that trainees do not receive other employment benefits such as paid leave or Central Provident Fund (CPF) contributions which employees in Singapore are typically entitled to under the Employment Act.[20]

Senior Parliament Secretary for Law, Rahayu Mahzam explained that MinLaw understood these concerns and these issues were being looked into. However, she cautioned that larger honorariums would need to be balanced against potential increases in costs to firms, particularly smaller firms.[19][20]

Admission to the Bar

A person seeking to be admitted to the Singapore Bar will generally need to meet the requirements to be a 'qualified person' (QP) and complete the Part B examinations (a practical course of instruction, culminating in practical and written examinations).[21]

To be considered a QP, a person will need to obtain an approved law degree. A list of approved law degrees is set out in the Legal Profession (Qualified Persons) Rules, which includes Bachelor of Laws and Juris Doctor degrees from various universities in Singapore, Australia, New Zealand, England, and the United States.[22][23]

Persons seeking to be QPs solely on the basis of an approved law degree conferred by a university outside Singapore will generally need to fulfil additional requirements to qualify as a QP, namely:[23]

  1. They must be a Singapore citizen or permanent resident
  2. They must graduate with at least a Second Class Honours or be in the top 70% of their cohort
  3. Their degree programme must have been undertaken on a full-time basis, they must have been an internal candidate, and the course of study must have been for at least 3 academic years
  4. The degree must not have been conferred as part of a twinning programme, must not be a combined or dual degree, external degree, or accelerated degree
  5. They must complete six months of relevant legal training (RLT) in Singapore or overseas
  6. They must pass the Part A examinations

See also

References

  1. ↑ Ewing-Chow, Michael; Aedit Abdullah (1999). "The Structure of the Legal Profession". In Kevin Tan (ed.). The Singapore legal system (2 ed.). NUS Press. p. 531. ISBN 9971-69-213-9.
  2. 1 2 "Statistics – The Law Society of Singapore". www.lawsociety.org.sg. 31 August 2023. Retrieved 2023-11-11.
  3. 1 2 3 "Headline: Fresh grads shun smaller law firms" (PDF). Smu.edu.sg. The Straits Times. 12 March 2012. p. B1. Retrieved 18 September 2017.
  4. ↑ Kong, Loh Chee (7 December 2007). "Carrots for lawyers to stay in S'pore". channelnewsasia.com. Retrieved 2009-10-02.
  5. ↑ Tan, Andrea (31 August 2009). "Singapore to Make Billions Handling Cross-Border Arbitrations". Bloomberg. Retrieved 2009-10-02.
  6. ↑ Tan, Andrea (11 August 2009). "Singapore Won't 'Turn Back,' Will License New Foreign Law Firms". Bloomberg. Retrieved 2009-10-02.
  7. ↑ Auto, Hermes (2020-11-16). "Benchmarking Singapore's best law firms". www.straitstimes.com. Retrieved 2023-01-30.
  8. ↑ "How Singapore's Big Five law firm Dentons Rodyk is embracing the future of work and ditching its traditional office for good". www.legal500.com. Retrieved 2023-04-11.
  9. ↑ Vijayan, K.C. (2022-11-15). "1 in 10 law firms here voted into Singapore's best law firms list". www.straitstimes.com. Retrieved 2023-04-11.
  10. ↑ Vijayan, K.C. (2022-11-24). "Rising stars named among the best law firms in 2023 list". www.straitstimes.com. Retrieved 2023-04-11.
  11. ↑ "ALB Asia Top 50 2022". www.legalbusinessonline.com. Retrieved 2023-04-11.
  12. ↑ Lum, Selina (19 August 2009). "Changes to legal profession". Straits Times. Archived from the original on 23 August 2009. Retrieved 2009-10-02.
  13. 1 2 "Public Consultation on Proposals to Implement the Recommendations of the Committee for the Professional Training of Lawyers". Ministry of Law. 15 November 2019. Retrieved 11 November 2023.
  14. ↑ The Committee for the Professional Training of Lawyers (29 March 2018). "Report of the Committee for the Professional Training of Lawyers" (PDF). Retrieved 11 November 2023.
  15. ↑ "Law Ministry Accepts Recommendations to Strengthen Professional Training of Lawyers". Ministry of Law. 30 August 2018. Retrieved 11 November 2023.
  16. ↑ "Deferment of Implementation of Recommendations of the Committee for the Professional Training of Lawyers". Ministry of Law. 28 February 2023. Retrieved 11 November 2023.
  17. ↑ Lum, Selina (2023-02-28). "Changes for stricter Bar exam and longer training for Singapore law grads pushed to 2024". The Straits Times. ISSN 0585-3923. Retrieved 2023-11-11.
  18. ↑ "Strengthening the Professional Training Regime for Lawyers in Singapore". Ministry of Law. 3 October 2023. Retrieved 11 November 2023.
  19. 1 2 "NTUC calls for more support for aspiring lawyers". www.ntuc.org.sg. Retrieved 2023-11-11.
  20. 1 2 Lum, Selina (2023-11-07). "'Better equipped to hit the ground running': Parliament approves longer training for law grads". The Straits Times. ISSN 0585-3923. Retrieved 2023-11-11.
  21. ↑ "Admission Requirements". Ministry of Law. Retrieved 11 November 2023.
  22. ↑ "Qualified Person". Singapore Institute of Legal Education. 5 October 2021. Retrieved 11 November 2023.
  23. 1 2 "Steps to Becoming a Qualified Person through Studying in an Overseas Scheduled University" (PDF). Singapore Institute of Legal Education. 1 December 2018. Retrieved 11 November 2023.


This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.