Open Government Partnership
AbbreviationOGP
FormationSeptember 20, 2011 (2011-09-20)
Founder Brazil

 Indonesia
 Mexico
 Norway
 The Philippines
 South Africa
 United Kingdom

 United States
Founded atNew York, United States
HeadquartersWashington, D.C., United States
Location
  • Worldwide
Membership
76 (National)
104 (Local)
CEO
Sanjay Pradhan
Staff (2020)
55
Websiteopengovpartnership.org

The Open Government Partnership (OGP) is a multilateral initiative that aims to secure concrete commitments from national and sub-national governments to promote open government, empower citizens, fight corruption, and harness new technologies to strengthen governance. In the spirit of multi-stakeholder collaboration, OGP is overseen by a steering committee including representatives of governments and civil society organizations.

History

The Open Government Partnership (OGP) was formally launched on September 20, 2011, on the sidelines of a UN General Assembly meeting during which Heads of State from 8 founding governments (Brazil, Indonesia, Mexico, Norway, Philippines, South Africa, United Kingdom, and the United States) endorsed the Open Government Declaration and announced their country action plans along with an equal number of civil society leaders.[1] The eight founding members also welcomed the commitment of 38 governments to join OGP.[2] In the first 10 years, OGP members have created over 4,500 commitments in more than 300 action plans.[3] India[4] and Russia[5] had initially expressed intentions to join the partnership, but neither follow through with the process.

Six months after its start, OGP had grown from eight action plans and 46 participating countries to 50 action plans and 54 participating countries.[6] The meeting in Brasilia brought together countries and organizations united in their belief in the power of transparency, with participation from anti-censorship campaigners in Yemen to reformers using data on primary schools to improve education in India.[7]

A total of 46 members had already published action plans containing over 300 open government commitments.[8] According to then Minister of the United Kingdom's Cabinet Office responsible for public transparency and open data, Francis Maude, Britain sought to "further secure the foundations of OGP as a globally recognized and respected international initiative…. [and to] strengthen the role of civil society organizations, encouraging greater collaboration with governments to forge more innovative and open ways of working."[8]

In 2013, OGP's thematic goals centered around Citizen Action and Responsive Government. In an era of hyperconnectivity, openness and transparency, as well as citizen participation and collaboration, are increasingly viewed as essential components of good governance.[9]

With the adoption and implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development by world leaders at a historic United Nations Summit, including Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) 16 for the "promotion of peaceful and inclusive societies," 2015 marked a milestone for the future of development outcomes and open government.[10] In October 2015, the Government of Mexico hosted the third OGP Global Summit in Mexico City emphasizing the theme of "Openness for All: Using the Open Government principles as key mechanisms to implement the post-2015 development agenda."

In early 2016, OGP launched a new pilot program designed to involve sub-national governments more proactively in the initiative.[11] Later in December 2016, the Government of France, in partnership with the World Resources Institute (WRI), hosted the fourth OGP Global Summit in the nation's capital, Paris, gathering 3000 representatives from 70 countries.[12]

Objectives

OGP provides a platform for reformers inside and outside of governments around the world to develop initiatives that promote transparency, empower citizens, fight corruption and harness new technologies to strengthen governance. OGP aims to secure concrete commitments from national and sub-national governments that drive open government reform and innovation in an effort to push countries further in the areas of transparency, accountability, and citizen engagement.[13] It is a voluntary partnership that countries opt to join and through which civil society organizations, in collaboration with government, can advance initiatives that they deem in line with their reform agendas.

Open Government Declaration

The principles of OGP are best explained by the Open Government Declaration. As outlined in the declaration, participating countries are expected to adhere to the following principles:

  • Acknowledge that people all around the world are demanding more openness in government. They are calling for greater civic participation in public affairs, and seeking ways to make their governments more transparent, responsive, accountable, and effective.
  • Recognize that countries are at different stages in their efforts to promote openness in government, and that each of us pursues an approach consistent with our national priorities and circumstances and the aspirations of our citizens.
  • Accept responsibility for seizing this moment to strengthen our commitments to promote transparency, fight corruption, empower citizens, and harness the power of new technologies to make government more effective and accountable.
  • Uphold the value of openness in our engagement with citizens to improve services, manage public resources, promote innovation, and create safer communities. We embrace principles of transparency and open government with a view toward achieving greater prosperity, well-being, and human dignity in our own countries and in an increasingly interconnected world.

OGP participants declare their commitment to increase the availability of information about governmental activities, support civic participation, implement the highest standards of professional integrity, and increase access to new technologies for openness and accountability.

Community of reformers

Rather than establish a worldwide transparency ranking of countries, OGP provides support and encouragement to countries around the world as they champion ambitious new reforms and deliver on their promises "under the watchful eyes of citizens,"[7] The community of reformers is meant to "offer support to those in government that are willing and to create a hook whereby the conversations among government and civil societies can occur."[14] This relationship between government and civil society is the cornerstone of OGP. Governments are expected to actively collaborate with civil society when drafting and implementing country commitments, as well as when reporting on and monitoring efforts.[13] The OGP process requires government to consult with civil society and citizens, and the Independent Reporting Mechanism (IRM) assesses the quality of this consultation.

Funding

Funding for OGP comes from participating countries, donors and development partners.

Member contributions

In May 2014, it was agreed that all participating governments are expected to contribute towards OGP's budget. Contributions are based on each participating country's income level (according to the World Bank Data).[15] Steering Committee set both minimum and recommended contribution levels.

Income levelMinimum member contribution Recommended member contribution
Low income$10,000 $25,000
Lower middle income$25,000 $50,000
Upper middle income$50,000 $100,000
High income$100,000 $200,000

Donor organizations

Grants made in 2015 came from Omidyar Network, Department for International Development (Government of the United Kingdom), Hewlett Foundation, Open Society Foundation, and the Ford Foundation. In May 2019, Open Society Foundation announced a potential $10,000,000 funding scheme awarded to OGP with $1,000,000 being awarded in 2020 and an additional $4,000,000 in matching grants within three years if OGP raises $5,000,000 from other partners.[16]

Structure

As a multi-stakeholder initiative, civil society participation is enshrined in OGP's foundational principles and management structures. Governments and civil society play an equally important role in managing the OGP through participation in the steering committee, OGP's executive management body, as well as at the national level.[13]

Co-chairs

Year Government Co-chair Civil Society Co-chair
2012–2013 Government of the United Kingdom Warren Krafchik, Senior Vice President, International Budget Partnership (IBP)
2013–2014 Government of Indonesia Rakesh Rajani, Head, Twaweza
2014–2015 Government of Mexico Alexandro Gonzales, Executive Director, GESOC A.C.
2015–2016 Government of South Africa Suneeta Kaimal, Chief Operating Officer, Natural Resource Governance Institute (NRGI)
2016–2017 Government of France Manish Bapna, Executive Vice President & Managing Director, World Resources Institute (WRI)
2017–2018 Government of Georgia Mukelani Dimba, Executive Director, Open Democracy Advice Centre (ODAC)
2018–2019 Government of Canada Nathaniel Heller, Executive Vice President, Results for Development (R4D)
2019–2020 Government of Argentina Robin Hodess, Director of Governance & Transparency, The B Team
2020–2021 Government of South Korea María Baron, Global Executive Director, Directorio Legislativo
2021–2022 Government of Italy Aidan Eyakuze, Executive Director, Twaweza
2022–2023 Government of Estonia Anabel Cruz, Founder Director, Institute for Communication and Development

Steering committee

The OGP Steering Committee provides guidance and direction at the international level in order to maintain the highest standards for the initiative and ensure its long-term sustainability. It is composed of equal numbers of representatives of governments and civil society organizations. OGP's leadership regularly rotates by appointing a new government co-chair and a new civil society co-chair every year. Incoming government and civil society members of the steering committee are selected by their peers.[17]

Subcommittees

Members of the OGP Steering Committee delegate work to the OGP Subcommittees. There are three subcommittees: 1) Governance and Leadership; 2) Criteria and Standards; and 3) Thematic Leadership.[18] The principle of parity is preserved in the Subcommittees as an equal number of government and civil society representatives serves in each one.

OGP Support Unit

The OGP Support Unit is a small, permanent secretariat that works closely with the steering committee to advance the goals of the OGP. It is designed to maintain institutional memory, manage OGP's external communications, ensure the continuity of organizational relationships with OGP's partners, and support the broader membership. It also serves as a neutral, third-party between governments and civil society organizations, ensuring that OGP maintains a productive balance between the two constituencies.[19]

Independent Reporting Mechanism

The Independent Reporting Mechanism (IRM) is the key means by which all stakeholders can track OGP progress in participating countries. The IRM produces biannual independent progress reports for each country participating in OGP. Progress reports assess governments on the development and implementation of their OGP action plans, as well as their progress in upholding open government principles. The reports also provide technical recommendations for improvements. These reports are intended to stimulate dialogue and promote accountability between member governments and citizens.[20]

International Experts Panel

The International Experts Panel (IEP) oversees the IRM by helping to ensure quality of the reviews, assess procedures and promote findings.[21]

Membership

  1.  Afghanistan
  2.  Albania
  3.  Argentina
  4.  Armenia
  5.  Australia
  6.  Bosnia and Herzegovina
  7.  Brazil
  8.  Bulgaria
  9.  Burkina Faso
  10.  Cabo Verde
  11.  Canada
  12.  Chile
  13.  Colombia
  14.  Costa Rica
  15.  Côte d'Ivoire
  16.  Croatia
  17.  Czech Republic
  18.  Denmark
  19.  Dominican Republic
  20.  Ecuador
  21.  Estonia
  22.  Finland
  23.  France
  24.  Georgia
  25.  Germany
  26.  Ghana
  27.  Greece
  28.  Guatemala
  29.  Honduras
  30.  Indonesia
  31.  Ireland
  32.  Israel
  33.  Italy
  34.  Jamaica
  35.  Jordan
  36.  Kenya
  37.  Kyrgyz Republic
  38.  Kosovo (non-voting member)
  39.  Latvia
  40.  Liberia
  41.  Lithuania
  42.  Malawi
  43.  Malta
  44.  Mexico
  45.  Moldova
  46.  Mongolia
  47.  Montenegro
  48.  Morocco
  49.  Netherlands
  50.  New Zealand
  51.  Nigeria
  52.  North Macedonia
  53.  Norway
  54.  Panama
  55.  Papua New Guinea
  56.  Paraguay
  57.  Peru
  58.  Philippines
  59.  Portugal
  60.  Romania
  61.  Senegal
  62.  Serbia
  63.  Seychelles
  64.  Sierra Leone
  65.  Slovak Republic
  66.  South Africa
  67.  South Korea
  68.  Spain
  69.  Sri Lanka
  70.  Sweden
  71.  Timor-Leste
  72.  Tunisia
  73.  Ukraine
  74.  United Kingdom
  75.  United States
  76.  Uruguay

OGP Local

  1. Abuja,  Nigeria
  2. Akhaltsikhe,  Georgia
  3. Anloga District,  Ghana
  4. Aragón,  Spain
  5. Armavir,  Armenia
  6. Asturias,  Spain
  7. Austin, Texas,  United States
  8. Banggai,  Indonesia
  9. Banská Bystrica,  Slovak Republic
  10. Basque Country,  Spain
  11. Béni Mellal-Khénifra,  Morocco
  12. Bishkek,  Kyrgyz Republic
  13. Bogotá,  Colombia
  14. Borongan,  Philippines
  15. Brebes,  Indonesia
  16. Buenos Aires,  Argentina
  17. Cartagena de Indias,  Colombia
  18. Carthage (municipality),  Tunisia
  19. Catalonia,  Spain
  20. Chepo,  Panama
  21. Chihuahua City,  Mexico
  22. Contagem,  Brazil
  23. Córdoba (City),  Argentina
  24. Córdoba (Province),  Argentina
  25. Corrientes,  Argentina
  26. Curridabat,  Costa Rica
  27. Detmold,  Germany
  28. El Kef,  Tunisia
  29. Elbasan,  Albania
  30. Elgeyo-Marakwet,  Kenya
  31. Glasgow,  United Kingdom
  32. Greater Karak,  Jordan
  33. Greater Salt,  Jordan
  34. Gwangju,  South Korea
  35. Gyumri,  Armenia
  36. Hamburg,  Germany
  37. Jalisco,  Mexico
  38. Kaduna State,  Nigeria
  39. Ketu South Municipal District,  Ghana
  40. Khmelnytskyi,  Ukraine
  41. Khoni,  Georgia
  42. Kildare County Council,  Ireland
  43. Kutaisi,  Georgia
  44. La Libertad,  Peru
  45. Lima,  Peru
  46. Los Angeles,  United States
  47. Madrid,  Spain
  48. Maipú,  Chile
  49. Makhanda, South Africa
  50. Makueni,  Kenya
  51. Manizales,  Colombia
  52. Mendoza,  Argentina
  53. Mérida,  Mexico
  54. Mexico State,  Mexico
  55. Montevideo,  Uruguay
  56. Nairobi,  Kenya
  57. Nandi,  Kenya
  58. Nariño,  Colombia
  59. Northern Ireland,  United Kingdom
  60. Novi Pazar,  Serbia
  61. Nuevo León - Monterrey Municipality - San Pedro Garza García,  Mexico
  62. Ontario,  Canada
  63. Osasco,  Brazil
  64. Ozurgeti,  Georgia
  65. Palermo,  Italy
  66. Paris,  France
  67. Peñalolén,  Chile
  68. Plateau,  Nigeria
  69. Québec,  Canada
  70. Quintana Roo,  Mexico
  71. Quito,  Ecuador
  72. Regueb,  Tunisia
  73. Rosario,  Argentina
  74. Rustavi,  Georgia
  75. Salcedo,  Dominican Republic
  76. Santa Catarina,  Brazil
  77. Santo Domingo de los Tsáchilas,  Ecuador
  78. São Paulo,  Brazil
  79. Sarchí,  Costa Rica
  80. Scotland,  United Kingdom
  81. Sekondi-Takoradi,  Ghana
  82. Semarang,  Indonesia
  83. Seoul,  South Korea
  84. Shama,  Ghana
  85. South Cotabato,  Philippines
  86. Sveti Nikole,  North Macedonia
  87. Tangier – Tetouan – Al Hoceima,  Morocco
  88. Tarkwa-Nsuaem,  Ghana
  89. Tbilisi,  Georgia
  90. Ternopil,  Ukraine
  91. Tétouan,  Tunisia
  92. Timișoara,  Romania
  93. Tirana,  Albania
  94. Tlajomulco de Zúñiga,  Mexico
  95. Tlalnepantla de Baz,  Mexico
  96. Valencian Community,  Spain
  97. Vanadzor,  Armenia
  98. Vinnytsia,  Ukraine
  99. Wassa Amenfi East,  Ghana
  100. West Nusa Tenggara,  Indonesia
  101. West Sumbawa,  Indonesia
  102. Yerevan,  Armenia
  103. Yucatán,  Mexico
  104. Žilina Region,  Slovak Republic

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria – In order to participate in OGP, governments must exhibit a demonstrated commitment to open government in four key areas, as measured by objective indicators and validated by independent experts.[22] The four critical areas of open government: fiscal transparency, access to information, asset disclosure and citizen engagement. Countries can earn a total of 16 points for their performance in these four metrics, or 12 points if they are not measured in one of the metrics. Countries that earn 75% of the applicable points (either 12 out of 16 or 9 out of 12) or more are eligible to join.[22] For an eligible country to join, all that is required is a letter from a ministerial representative indicating agreement with the Open Government Declaration and intent to participate OGP, as well as the leading agency and an individual point of contact for future work.[22]

The following countries are eligible, but have yet to express interest to join the partnership as of May 2023.[23]

  1.  Angola
  2.  Austria
  3.  Belgium
  4.  Bhutan
  5.  Bolivia
  6.  Guyana
  7.  Iceland
  8.  Japan
  9.  Luxembourg
  10.  Maldives
  11.  Mozambique
  12.  Namibia
  13.    Nepal
  14.  Niger
  15.  Pakistan
  16.  Poland
  17.  Slovenia
  18.   Switzerland
  19.  Tanzania
  20.  Trinidad and Tobago

Withdrawal

Mechanism

Co-creation

Action plan co-creation – OGP participating countries co-create a National Action Plan (NAP) with civil society. The actions plans are "the driving device" for OGP as it is the instrument through which government and civil society develop their agreed reforms, or commitments, every two years.[14] The set of commitments aim to advance transparency, accountability, participation and/or technological innovation. Countries, with the active involvement of civil society, are encouraged to tackle new and ambitious commitments as well as build upon past successes. Effective public consultation process during the development of action plans can help build broad support for commitments with a wider set of actors to rely on for successful implementation.[32] OGP participating countries operate on a two-year action plan calendar cycle, whereby countries are continuously implementing their programs. The government must regularly report on its progress and work with civil society to monitor and achieve the agreed reforms. Progress is evaluated at regular intervals by an independent researcher appointed by the OGP's Independent Reporting Mechanism.

Civil society engagement

The Civil Society Engagement (CSE) Team works to broaden, strengthen and engage a strong civil society network to participate in OGP, particularly at the national level. The team supports national civil society actors to help them make better use of the OGP process – including the design, implementation and monitoring of OGP action plans – for achieving their own advocacy objectives.[33]

OGP Local

Launched in 2016 as the sub-national pilot program, OGP Local seeks to extend the principles of OGP to the local level. A total of 15 sub-national governments were selected to participate in the pilot program and, with the support of the OGP Support Unit and steering committee, have developed national action plans in collaboration with civil society. They will actively contribute to peer learning and networking activities with other sub-national governments and, like OGP's member countries, will be assessed by the IRM.[34] The cohort later expanded to 20 before further expansion in October 2020, with 56 new local jurisdictions added to the program.[35] In 2022, 30 new more local jurisdictions joined OGP Local.[36]

Open Parliaments

As OGP continued to expand, engagement with legislative institutions also became more prevalent. In some OGP participating countries, open parliament has become a particularly significant part of the push for more open government, although commitments related to parliamentary transparency, public participation, and accountability are not always co-created in the same process as the country's OGP action plan. The open parliament initiative also benefits from strategic collaborations with the Open Parliament e-Network (OPeN), a global consortium of organizations focused on parliamentary engagement. As of 2020, its members are Directorio Legislativo, the Westminster Foundation for Democracy (WFD), the National Democratic Institute (NDI), ParlAmericas, Red Latinoamericana por la Transparencia Legislativa (RedLTL), and the OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights.[37]

OGP Global Summits

OGP participants gather regularly at regional and global events to share their findings in person and to strengthen international cooperation.[38] The most significant of these events has been the Global Summit, held annually since 2012. At the 2013 Global Summit, the steering committee voted to skip the 2014 Summit and reconvene in 2015.[39] In addition to providing spaces where participating countries and civil society groups could share information in person, OGP wanted to find a way to showcase standout efforts of global transparency leaders.

Year Event Host Dates
2012 The 1st OGP Annual Meeting Brasilia,  Brazil April 17–18, 2012[40]
2013 The 2nd OGP Annual Meeting London,  United Kingdom October 31–November 1, 2013[41]
2015 The 3rd OGP Global Summit Mexico City,  Mexico October 28–29, 2015[42]
2016 The 4th OGP Global Summit Paris,  France December 7–8, 2016[43]
2018 The 5th OGP Global Summit Tbilisi,  Georgia July 18–19, 2018[44]
2019 The 6th OGP Global Summit Ottawa,  Canada May 29–30, 2019[45]
2021 The 7th OGP Global Summit Seoul,  South Korea December 13–17, 2021[46]
2023 The 8th OGP Global Summit Tallinn,  Estonia September 6–7, 2023[47]

Open Government Awards

Year Theme Category Winner
2014[48] Citizen Engagement Gold Awards 1. Denmark for "Statutory Elected Senior Citizens’ Council"
2. Montenegro for "Be Responsible, Zero Grey Economy"
3. Philippines for "Grassroots Participatory Budgeting"
Silver Awards 4. Italy for "OpenCoesione-Monithon"
5. Netherlands for "MijnWOZ: My Law on Appreciating Local Property"
6. United Kingdom for "Sciencewise"
Bronze Awards 7. Mexico for "Centro de Itegracion Ciudadana"
8. Peru for "Children of Miraflores"
9. United States for "Collaboration and Innovation through Prizes, Crowdsourcing, and Citizen Science"
10. France for "data.gouv.fr"
2015[49] Improving Public Services Overall Awards 1. Uruguay for "atuservicio.uy"
2. Indonesia for "The Guiding Lights of the Archipelago"
3. United Kingdom for "Neighborhood Planning"
Regional Awards Africa: Tunisia for "Tunisia Online e-Procurement System"
Americas: Mexico for "Stakeholder Participation in Day Care Center Safety"
Asia-Pacific: Armenia for "Smart Municipality"
Europe: Croatia for "E-Citizens"
Special Recognition Indonesia for "The Guiding Lights of the Archipelago" for how the initiative benefits vulnerable populations
2016[50] Making Transparency Count Overall Awards 1. Ukraine for "ProZorro: Bringing Government Procurement to the People"
2. Indonesia for "API Pemilu: Improving Access and Understanding of Elections Data"
3. Honduras for "Construction Sector Transparency Initiative Honduras: Better Infrastructure through Transparency"
Regional Awards Africa: Malawi for "Construction Sector Transparency Initiative Malawi: Development through Transparency"
Americas: Mexico for "Budget Transparency Portal: Expenditure Tracking from the Executive to the Streets"
Asia-Pacific: Mongolia for "Check My Service: Closing the Feedback Loop"
Europe: Netherlands for "OpenSpending: Reporting Directly to the Taxpayers"
Special Recognition Ukraine for "ProZorro: Bringing Government Procurement to the People" for the involvement of youth in the project

See also

References

  1. ↑ "Open Government Partnership". whitehouse.gov. Retrieved 2016-04-27 – via National Archives.
  2. ↑ "The Open Government Partnership". www.state.gov. Retrieved 2016-04-27.
  3. ↑ "OGP Vital Signs - 10 Years of Data in Review". Open Government Partnership. Retrieved 2022-04-01.
  4. ↑ "India in Open Government and Open Government in India (SSIR)". ssir.org. Retrieved 2021-02-09.
  5. ↑ "Russia Retracts Commitment to Transparency, Leaves Open Government Partnership [Update]". Global Integrity. 2013-05-17. Retrieved 2021-02-09.
  6. ↑ Harge, Jorge (April 10, 2012). "The Open Government Partnership – from eight to 54 countries". The Guardian.
  7. 1 2 Dudman, Jane (April 16, 2012). "Open Government Partnership: What We're Going to Learn in Brasilia". The Guardian.
  8. 1 2 Maude, Francis (2012-09-26). "Francis Maude: transparency brings tangible benefits". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 2016-04-27.
  9. ↑ Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono (September 24, 2014). "Opening remarks at the Open Government Partnership High-Level Side Event at the 69th United Nations General Assembly" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on May 13, 2016. Retrieved April 24, 2014.
  10. ↑ "Sustainable Development Goals," Department of Public Information, United Nations.
  11. ↑ "Subnational Government Pilot Program | Open Government Partnership". www.opengovpartnership.org. Archived from the original on 2015-12-19.
  12. ↑ "OGP Global Summit". Open Government Partnership. Archived from the original on 2017-09-18. Retrieved 2016-12-09.
  13. 1 2 3 "FAQs". Open Government Partnership. Archived from the original on 2016-04-19. Retrieved 2016-04-27.
  14. 1 2 "Samantha Power: what I learnt at the OGP". The Guardian. 2012-04-20. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 2016-04-27.
  15. ↑ "Finances and Budget". Open Government Partnership.
  16. ↑ "Open Society Foundations Launches Challenge Grant to Foster Accountable Governance". www.opensocietyfoundations.org. Retrieved 2020-11-13.
  17. ↑ "Steering Committee". Open Government Partnership. October 2019. Retrieved 2022-07-04.
  18. ↑ "Steering Committee Composition".
  19. ↑ "Staff". Open Government Partnership. Retrieved 2022-07-04.
  20. ↑ "Independent Reporting Mechanism - Overview". Open Government Partnership. Retrieved 2022-07-04.
  21. ↑ "International Experts Panel". Open Government Partnership. Retrieved 2022-07-04.
  22. 1 2 3 "Eligibility Criteria". Open Government Partnership. Retrieved 2016-04-27.
  23. ↑ "Eligibility Criteria & OGP Values Check Assessment". Open Government Partnership. Retrieved 2023-05-27.
  24. ↑ "Turkey (Withdrawn)". Open Government Partnership. Retrieved 2021-02-09.
  25. ↑ "Hungary (withdrawn), Open Government Partnership
  26. ↑ "Tanzania (Withdrawn)". Open Government Partnership. Retrieved 2021-02-09.
  27. ↑ "Trinidad and Tobago (Withdrawn)". Open Government Partnership. 20 February 2018. Retrieved 2020-11-13.
  28. ↑ "Pakistan – Letter Regarding Withdrawal (March 2022)". Open Government Partnership. 7 March 2022. Retrieved 2022-03-28.
  29. ↑ "Luxembourg Letter of Withdrawal from OGP
  30. ↑ "El Salvador Exits International Partnership on Open Government - Open Government Partnership %". Open Government Partnership. 28 March 2023. Retrieved 2023-03-29.
  31. ↑ "Azerbaijan Permanently Suspended from the Open Government Partnership". Open Government Partnership. 2023-08-17. Retrieved 2023-08-17.
  32. ↑ "Develop a National Action Plan". Open Government Partnership. Retrieved 2016-04-27.
  33. ↑ "Civil Society Engagement". Open Government Partnership. Retrieved 2016-04-27.
  34. ↑ "Subnational Government Pilot Program," The Open Government Partnership. http://www.opengovpartnership.org/how-it-works/subnational-government-pilot-program Archived 2015-12-19 at the Wayback Machine
  35. ↑ "56 Local Jurisdictions Join Global Partnership to Promote Open Government". Open Government Partnership. 20 October 2020. Retrieved 2020-11-13.
  36. ↑ "Open Government Partnership Welcomes 30 New Local Governments". Open Government Partnership. 17 May 2022. Retrieved 2022-06-16.
  37. ↑ "OPeN – Open Parliament e-Network". Retrieved 2020-11-13.
  38. ↑ "Events". Open Government Partnership. Retrieved 2016-05-09.
  39. ↑ "Summit Planned 2014 Indonesia". www.freedominfo.org. Retrieved 2016-05-09.
  40. ↑ Partnership, Open Government (2011-12-06), OGP, retrieved 2018-12-09
  41. ↑ "London Summit | Open Government Partnership". www.opengovpartnership.org. Retrieved 2018-12-09.
  42. ↑ "OPEN GOVERNMENT PARTNERSHIP GLOBAL SUMMIT MEXICO | 2015 | Open Government Partnership". www.opengovpartnership.org. 27 October 2015. Retrieved 2018-12-09.
  43. ↑ "OGP Global Summit 2016: Paris | Open Government Partnership". www.opengovpartnership.org. 5 December 2016. Retrieved 2018-12-09.
  44. ↑ "OGP Global Summit 2018: Tbilisi | Open Government Partnership". www.opengovpartnership.org. 17 July 2018. Retrieved 2018-12-09.
  45. ↑ Canada, Treasury Board Secretariat of. "Open Government Partnership Global Summit 2019". open.canada.ca. Retrieved 2018-12-09.
  46. ↑ "2021 OGP Global Summit: Seoul, Republic of Korea". Open Government Partnership. Retrieved 2021-05-12.
  47. ↑ "OGP Global Summit 2023 Tallinn". avpeesti2023.ee. Retrieved 2023-02-02.
  48. ↑ "Open Government Awards". www.opengovawards.org. Retrieved 2018-12-17.
  49. ↑ "OGP Booklet 2015" (PDF). Open Government Partnership. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2021-09-05. Retrieved 2018-12-17.
  50. ↑ "Making Transparency Count: The Open Government Awards". Open Government Partnership. 7 December 2016. Retrieved 2021-02-09.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.