The Self-Sufficiency Project was a Canadian experiment in the 1990s that provided a "generous, time-limited earnings supplement available to single parents who had been on welfare for a least a year, and who subsequently left welfare and found full-time work."[1]

The study found that individuals offered a SSP subsidy were four percent more likely to stay on welfare to receive the benefit, but once people qualified for the SSP supplement, 44% left welfare dependence and were employed full-time—defined as working at least 30 hours a week. The program was interesting since increases in employment boosted payroll and other taxes to a large enough extent that the subsidy paid for itself.

Later research suggested that the control group was on trend to catch-up with those who received the supplement in the long-run.[2][3][4]

Studies

Berkeley's David Card has studied this extensively with several papers, revealing the aforementioned results.

See also

International:

References

  1. Michalopoulos, Charles, Philip K. Robins and David Card. 2005. "When financial work incentives pay for themselves: evidence from a randomized social experiment for welfare recipients." Journal of Public Economics.
  2. Card, David; Michalopoulos, Charles; Robins, Philip (August 2001). "The Limits to Wage Growth: Measuring the Growth Rate of Wages For Recent Welfare Leavers". NBER Working Papers.
  3. Blundell, Richard (May 2002). "(Lecture) Welfare-to-Work: Which Policies Work and Why?" (PDF). ifs.org.uk. Archived from the original (PDF) on 9 August 2017.
  4. Bloom, Dan; Charles, Michalopoulos (May 2001). "How Welfare and Work Policies Affect Employment and Income: A Synthesis of Research" (PDF). mdrc.org. Archived (PDF) from the original on 16 Jan 2024. Retrieved 16 Jan 2024.


This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.