Two images, stacked vertically, of the same scene showing Anakin Skywalker, Yoda, and Obi-Wan Kenobi. The top image shows an older man as Anakin. The bottom image shows a younger man as Anakin.
The original theatrical release of Return of the Jedi features Sebastian Shaw as Anakin Skywalker (above left). The 2004 DVD release replaced his appearance as a Force spirit with Hayden Christensen (below), who played the character in the prequels.

Changes in Star Wars re-releases vary from minor differences in color timing, audio mixing, and take choices to major insertions of new visual effects, additions of characters and dialogue, scene expansions, and replacement of original cast members with newer ones. Though changes were also made to the prequel trilogy, the original trilogy saw the most alteration. Dissatisfied with the original theatrical cuts of the original Star Wars film,[lower-alpha 1] The Empire Strikes Back, and Return of the Jedi, creator George Lucas altered the films in ways that were ostensibly not initially possible, primarily due to limitations of time, budget, and technology.

While changes to the Star Wars films had been made since the release of A New Hope in 1977, the first major changes were made in 1997 with the release of a Special Edition remaster in commemoration of the franchise's twentieth anniversary. These changes were largely made as visual effects tests for the forthcoming prequel films, demonstrating the possibilities of computer-generated imagery (CGI). Additional notable changes were made when the original trilogy was released on DVD in 2004, in an attempt to create more consistency with the prequel trilogy. More changes were made to the films for their Blu-ray release in 2011 and for their 4K Ultra HD release in 2019.

Although some critics felt that many smaller changes were improvements, innocuous, or understandable, most larger changes were received negatively by fans and critics—particularly those made to the original trilogy, which has never been released in its unaltered form in high definition.

Background

Prior to making Star Wars, franchise creator George Lucas experienced dissatisfaction with the re-editing by studios of both of the films he had directed. His first feature, THX 1138 (1971), had five minutes removed by Warner Bros.[1] Universal Pictures had his subsequent film, American Graffiti (1973), edited to remove several minutes.[2]

For more than 100 years, and in 76 nations, the arbitrator of a work of art has been the creator or creators of that work. Who better than the person whose hard labor and unique talent created the art should determine what is an appropriate alteration? ... Creative expression and imagination are human qualities; they are part of the very essence of what it is to be human. People who alter or destroy works of art, and our cultural heritage, for profit or as an exercise of power are barbarians, and if the laws of the United States continue to condone this behavior, we will become a barbaric society. ... The assurance of the artist's moral rights adds stability. The corporations, which hold many of the copyrights, are unstable entities. ... Attention should be paid to this question of our soul, and not simply to accounting procedures. Attention should be paid to the interest of those who are yet unborn, who should be able to see this generation as it saw itself, and the past generation as it saw itself.

George Lucas in 1988[3]

Following the success of Star Wars, in 1977, Lucas's original version of THX 1138 was theatrically released.[1] The restored cut of American Graffiti was released theatrically in 1978; this was altered for 1998 DVD with a computer-generated (CGI) change to the opening shot.[2] In 2004, Lucas supervised a director's cut of THX 1138, restoring the picture while adding some modern special effects.[4]

As a proponent of artist's moral rights and having endured alterations to his works made by studios without his consent, Lucas was one of many filmmakers who spoke before the U.S. House of Representatives in 1988 against the ongoing colorization of black-and-white films by studios.[5]

Release history

  • 1977: In May, Star Wars was theatrically released.[6] Three different audio versions (a Dolby Stereo mix, a six-channel mix for 70 mm screenings, and a mono mix print) were created, with significant differences.[7] Later that year, among others, a silent, English-subtitled Super 8 reel version of the film was released by Ken Films.[8]
  • 1980: In May, The Empire Strikes Back was theatrically released.[6] After its initial opening, but before its wide release, Lucas extended the end sequence.[9] A 70 mm print of the film differed from the more widely distributed 35 mm print in takes of dialogue, visual and sound effects, shot choices, and transitions between shots;[10] none of these changes appeared in later releases, with exception of one dialogue change.[11]
  • 1981: In April, Star Wars was re-released, with the addition of the subtitles "Episode IV" and "A New Hope" added to the opening crawl.[12]
  • 1983: In May, Return of the Jedi was theatrically released.[6]
  • 1985: The original Star Wars film was re-released on VHS, LaserDisc, and Capacitance Electronic Disc (CED) with an improved audio mix. The LaserDisc and CED sped the film up by 3% to fit onto a single disc.[11][lower-alpha 2]
  • 1993: The original trilogy was released on LaserDisc as "The Definitive Collection". With the exception of a new THX audio mix, scratch and dirt removal, and color balance changes, it matched the original theatrical releases.[11]
  • 1995: The original trilogy was re-released on VHS with THX audio, advertised as the final release of the theatrical versions.[13][14][15]

There will only be one [version of the films]. And it won't be what I would call the "rough cut", it'll be the "final cut". The other one will be some sort of interesting artifact that people will look at and say, "There was an earlier draft of this." The same thing happens with plays and earlier drafts of books. In essence, films never get finished, they get abandoned. At some point, you're dragged off the picture kicking and screaming while somebody says, "Okay, it's done." That isn't really the way it should work. Occasionally, [you can] go back and get your cut of the video out there, which I did on both American Graffiti and THX 1138; that's the place where it will live forever. So what ends up being important in my mind is what the DVD version is going to look like, because that's what everybody is going to remember. The other versions will disappear. Even the 35 million tapes of Star Wars out there won't last more than 30 or 40 years. A hundred years from now, the only version of the movie that anyone will remember will be the DVD version [of the Special Edition], and you'll be able to project it on a 20-foot-by-40-foot screen with perfect quality. I think it's the director's prerogative, not the studio's, to go back and reinvent a movie.

George Lucas in 1997[16]

Significant changes

Star Wars

Title change

The first film was released in 1977 under the title Star Wars. The subtitle Episode IV  A New Hope was retroactively added to the opening crawl in a subsequent release.[12][36] Lucasfilm dates the addition to the theatrical re-release on April 10, 1981.[11][12][36] This change was made to bring the original film in line with the titling of its sequel, Star Wars: Episode V – The Empire Strikes Back (1980).[11]

Tatooine

Some scenes on Tatooine were modified for the 1997 Special Edition, most notably an alteration to the Greedo scene and the restoration of a deleted scene featuring Jabba the Hutt. Two newly filmed shots of stormtroopers and CGI dewbacks were inserted before a shot in which the static creature in the background was replaced with moving CGI.[17][37][lower-alpha 11] Other modifications introduced in various releases include a CGI replacement of the Jawa sandcrawler,[38] a different sound effect for Obi-Wan Kenobi making a krayt dragon call to scare off the Tusken Raiders,[39][lower-alpha 12] the addition of rocks in front of the cave R2-D2 hides in,[17][lower-alpha 13] the replacement of an external shot of Obi-Wan's hut with a new angle showing Luke Skywalker's parked landspeeder,[11][40] and color and continuity changes involving the binary sunset.[41] The shadow of the landspeeder was redone in one shot,[42] and creatures, robots, and ships were added to Mos Eisley, including elements created for the Shadows of the Empire multimedia campaign.[17][43][lower-alpha 14] Some of the aliens in the cantina were replaced with new CGI designs, and a shot of the Millennium Falcon fighting its way out of Mos Eisley was added.[17]

Greedo scene

Han Solo (Harrison Ford) is cornered in the Mos Eisley cantina by the Rodian bounty hunter Greedo (Paul Blake), and Han shoots under the table to kill Greedo.[29] The 1997 release of the film alters the scene so that Greedo shoots first and misses (with Han's head digitally pivoted away from the blaster bolt). The scene was changed again for the 2004 DVD release of the film so that Han and Greedo shoot almost simultaneously;[31] this was shortened by several frames for the 2011 Blu-ray.[45] The scene was further modified for the 2019 4K Ultra HD release with the addition of a close-up shot of Greedo speaking (without subtitles),[lower-alpha 15] the removal of a reverse shot of Greedo, and a re-rendering of the visual effects.[28][48][lower-alpha 16]

Because I was thinking mythologically  should he be a cowboy, should he be John Wayne? And I said, "Yeah, he should be John Wayne." And when you're John Wayne, you don't shoot people [first]  you let them have the first shot.[lower-alpha 17]

George Lucas in 2015[50]

The original version of the Greedo scene is considered iconic,[48] while the altered version is one of the most controversial changes to the film. Fans have coined the phrase "Han shot first" to protest the change,[51] which according to Polygon alters Han's moral ambiguity and his fundamental character.[52] Lucas has stated that he always intended for Greedo to shoot first.[50][53] In 2015, a replica of an early script for Star Wars was discovered in the archives of the University of New Brunswick library. In the script, dated March 15, 1976, only Han shoots.[54][55]

Jabba the Hutt

The original script for Star Wars included a scene between Han and Jabba the Hutt, set in a Mos Eisley docking bay. The scene was filmed by a second unit with Declan Mulholland wearing a furry vest as a stand-in for Jabba.[39][56][57] Lucas intended to replace Mulholland in post-production with a stop-motion character, but due to time limitations and budget constraints, the scene was cut. In the 1997 edition, the scene was reinserted with a CGI Jabba replacing Mulholland,[39] marking an early example of a fully CGI character with dialogue to appear in a film[57] (preceding the introduction of Jar Jar Binks in The Phantom Menace by two years).[58] To explain Jabba's mobility despite his sluglike form, artist Claudia Mullaly conceived of repulsorlifts (one of which he sits upright in), but this concept was dropped.[59]

In the original footage, Ford walked through the area where Jabba's tail would be. As a workaround, Han was digitally moved to appear as if he steps on Jabba's tail, with the Hutt squealing as a result;[39] this has been poorly received, including by its original animator.[39][57] Several Rodians (at least one of whom is a look-alike of Greedo) appear in the background.[56] Boba Fett was also added to the end of the scene, and seems to break the fourth wall.[60][57]

The insertion of this scene into the film was criticized for being superfluous to the previous cantina scene with Greedo, slowing down the pacing without moving the plot forward, and undermining the reveal of the Millennium Falcon in the next scene as well as Jabba's original debut in Return of the Jedi.[11][39][56][61][62] The 1997 CGI Jabba has been described as "atrocious",[39] and for the 2004 DVD release was replaced with a higher-fidelity model resembling his CGI appearance in The Phantom Menace.[39][63][57] On the 2004 audio commentary for A New Hope, Lucas reflected that while he did not mind cutting the scene when he was not sure if he would make sequels, he subsequently wanted it to be included as it introduces a character important to Han's story arc.[64] ScreenCrush later reflected that the 2004 version "was an improvement, but only in the way that nausea is an improvement over vomit".[65]

Luke's lightsaber

During the training scene aboard the Millennium Falcon, Luke's lightsaber—which in some releases had erroneously appeared green—was corrected to blue in the 2011 release.[66][35]

Death Star

For the Special Edition, a scene of Han chasing a squad of stormtroopers on the Death Star was altered to replace several stormtroopers at the end of the corridor with dozens in formation. Den of Geek criticized the change as being "too much" and making Han's shooting back at them less believable.[56] Two Screen Rant writers call the updated version "utterly ridiculous" but "much funnier".[67][68] Another shot of a stormtrooper hitting his head on a door had a sound effect added in 2004, making it seem like the goof was intentional.[69][70]

In the original version of Obi-Wan and Darth Vader's duel, Obi-Wan's saber appeared to "short out" when foreshortened toward the camera (a result of the in-camera effects failing to account for this viewing angle).[71] A glow was added in 2004, and a fully finished blade was added to these shots in 2019.[72][73] Also in the 2019 version, Obi-Wan's lightsaber was adjusted to appear consistently blue, and the flash effects of the lightsabers clashing was redone.[35][74]

Both the explosions of Alderaan and the Death Star had shockwaves added to them starting with the 1997 edition.[11][68]

Yavin 4

The Special Edition of A New Hope incorporated a deleted scene on Yavin 4, in which Luke is briefly reunited with his childhood friend Biggs Darklighter. This was felt by some to strengthen the relationship of the characters during the climactic Death Star attack run.[75][76][lower-alpha 18] The scene also included the appearance of Red X-Wing Squadron Leader Garven Dreis, an addition that pleased his actor Drewe Henley although his credit remained not corrected.[77]

The original film includes a two-shot sequence of X-wing fighters flying past Yavin towards the Death Star (showing the fighters from behind, then the front). For the 1997 edition, these were replaced with a 180° turn of CGI X-wings (seen from the front, then the back). Wired points out that the addition of the moon (Yavin 4) in the background places it "very clearly in range of the Death Star from the very beginning of the battle."[17] Additionally, engine sounds were added to the battle scene which make parts of the musical score difficult to hear.[56]

The Empire Strikes Back

In addition to other changes, the Special Edition inserted new footage of stormtroopers, portrayed by Lucasfilm interns, including future director Christopher Miller, who later worked on Solo: A Star Wars Story (2018).[78]

Hoth

Close-up shots of the wampa that captures Luke on Hoth were inserted.[17][lower-alpha 19]

The Emperor's hologram

For his appearance as a hologram in The Empire Strikes Back, the Emperor was originally portrayed by masked actress Marjorie Eaton and voice actor Clive Revill. For the 2004 DVD edition and subsequent releases, this was replaced by new footage of Ian McDiarmid, who plays the character in later films.[80][81][lower-alpha 20] The dialogue was changed in the new version, making Vader seem to have been unaware of Luke's paternity despite knowing his last name.[84]

ScreenCrush argues that this change is the worst to any Star Wars film, owing to the altered dialogue.[84] Wired writes that it is unclear whether the new dialogue is meant to portray Vader and the Emperor "deliberately testing one another", and also that McDiarmid "looks more like he did 20 years before in the timeline than he does a year later in Return of the Jedi".[17] Sources such as Polygon and io9 regard the actor replacement itself as logical,[52][76] and Screen Rant praises it as "a change that blends seamlessly with the original film, due in large part to the relative ease of swapping one holographic image for another".[67]

Boba Fett

Boba Fett's dialogue in the film was originally recorded by Jason Wingreen.[31][85] Subsequently, Attack of the Clones revealed Boba to be a clone of Jango Fett, played by Temuera Morrison.[86] To reflect this, Morrison re-recorded Wingreen's lines for the 2004 edition of the film.[31][85][87][lower-alpha 21]

In the shot when the Millennium Falcon detaches from the Star Destroyer, Boba Fett's ship, the Slave I, was replaced with a CGI version following the Falcon more closely.[17] Both WhatCulture and Wired opine that the change makes it hard to believe that Han could not see Fett.[90][17]

Cloud City

New establishing shots were added to Cloud City, which according to Lucas were added partially because director Irvin Kershner was dissatisfied with the limitations of the location's set.[91] The additions create some inconsistencies with later shots. Another shot has a railing added to it, which does not reflect properly.[17] New shots of Cloud City's citizens reacting to Lando Calrissian's evacuation orders were also added.[17][lower-alpha 22]

In the 1997 edition, the scene of Luke dropping down the chute to escape Vader was modified to include an audible scream—created using the sound of the Emperor screaming as he falls down the shaft in Return of the Jedi; this received criticism and was removed in later releases.[17]

Ending

Following the initial limited theatrical release, Lucas added three exterior shots to the denouement to clarify that Lando and Chewbacca are on the Falcon, not the Rebel frigate that Luke, Leia, and the droids are on.[9]

In the 1997 edition, a line of Vader's dialogue was replaced and a shot of his shuttle landing in his Star Destroyer (using stock footage of the second Death Star from Return of the Jedi in which Moff Jerjerrod appears) was inserted into the sequence in which Luke uses the Force to contact Leia.[17][92] Wired calls this "Yet another addition that answers a question no one had."[17]

Return of the Jedi

Jabba's palace

In the Special Edition, an establishing shot of a bantha herd was inserted,[92] and a CGI beak and extra tentacles were added to the sarlacc.[17][93][94] Jabba's dialogue was given subtitles, although C-3PO translates most of his lines.[95] The 2011 edition extends the front door of Jabba's palace as seen from the outside to make it appear about three times wider.[96] The Blu-ray also added a Dug to the inside of the palace, which was criticized as standing out from puppet aliens in the same scene.[61][97]

The scene in which Jabba feeds the dancer Oola to his rancor opens with a performance by the Max Rebo Band and its lead singer, Sy Snootles. In the original theatrical release, the song is "Lapti Nek", sung in the fictional language Huttese. The Special Edition changed the performance to the new song "Jedi Rocks",[98] which mostly received negative criticism.[52][99][100] Polygon's Owen Good describes the new vocals as difficult to listen to and having "the volume and vocal fry of a higher pitched Tina Turner but none of the soul".[52][lower-alpha 23] The puppet used for Snootles was also replaced with CGI. According to Special Edition producer Rick McCallum, this change was made because Lucas could not originally achieve the "large musical number" he envisioned because characters could not move in certain ways; Snootles could not open her mouth to lip sync correctly, and her eyes did not move. The Special Edition increased the size of the Max Rebo Band from three members to twelve.[98] Additional footage was filmed of Boba Fett flirting with one of the dancers;[101] original Fett actor Jeremy Bulloch thought this was somewhat contrary to the character's nature.[102]

In the theatrical release of the film, Oola's death is filmed from outside the rancor pit: she falls into the pit, and her scream is heard from off-screen. In the 1997 edition, extra shots were inserted depicting her in the pit, including shots where she looks up to the crowd, the pit door being raised, and a shot of her terror. The rancor and Oola as she screams remain off-screen.[76] Femi Taylor, who played Oola, impressed critics with her ability to reprise the role over a decade later without visible difference.[76][56] Wired notes that "they put a different eyeshadow color on her, so she's not exactly seamless."[17] James Whitbrook at io9 praised the additions to the scene, writing that it teased the rancor well while still keeping the monster a surprise for Luke's later battle with it.[76] Conversely, Den of Geek UK criticized the additions as unnecessary and felt that they made the audience familiar with the pit, weakening Luke's scene.[56]

In 2004, Lucas revealed that he had considered adding a shot of Fett escaping the sarlacc, but decided against it because it would have detracted from the scene's focus: Jabba's death.[103] Fett's survival was eventually depicted in the Disney+ live-action streaming series The Mandalorian (2019–present) and The Book of Boba Fett (2021–2022).[88][89]

Climax on the second Death Star

At the climax of the film, the Emperor tortures Luke with Force lightning, prompting Darth Vader to throw the Emperor down a chasm. In the original version of the scene, Vader has no dialogue.[104] Starting with the 2011 edition, Vader mutters "No" and then yells a drawn-out "No!", creating a parallel with his near-identical cry at the end of Revenge of the Sith.[105] This addition was described as being unnecessary at best, and at worst being clumsy, sounding terrible, and seeming to mock the scene in the prequel.[104][105][11] A Polygon writer argues that the change displays a distrust in the audience's ability to interpret Vader's emotions and further that it made the emotional scene "laughable".[52]

In the scene where Anakin Skywalker is unmasked, the 2004 edition digitally removed his eyebrows to reflect Anakin burning on Mustafar at the end of Revenge of the Sith.[87] Actor Sebastian Shaw's brown eyes were also digitally changed to blue to match Hayden Christensen's eye color.[106]

Victory celebration

The film ends with a scene of the Rebel Alliance and a village of Ewoks on Endor celebrating the death of the Emperor and victory over the Empire. The original theatrical release of the film features the song "Ewok Celebration", also known as "Yub Nub", playing over the celebration.[11][99] The 1997 edition release of the film replaced "Ewok Celebration" with score composed by John Williams titled "Victory Celebration",[11] and the scene was lengthened to include shots of celebration on the planets Coruscant,[11][107] Bespin, and Tatooine.[108] The 2004 edition further added a shot set on Naboo, in which a Gungan is given a line of dialogue,[11] and added the Senate building and Jedi Temple to Coruscant.[109]

The concept for the interplanetary montage was discussed during the film's pre-production.[110]

Anakin's Force spirit

"It was added in because it's a way of finishing off the entire series. The idea was that your inner person would go back to where we left it off, when it turned to the dark side -- when you got burned up and everything, but before you got burned up. So when you come back to the good side of the Force, it's your former persona that survives, not the Darth Vader persona."

George Lucas in 2005 speaking to Hayden Christensen[111]

At the end of the film, Darth Vader is redeemed by killing the Emperor to save Luke Skywalker's life, then dies of his injuries shortly after, and appears to Luke as Anakin Skywalker alongside the Force spirits of Yoda and Obi-Wan Kenobi. In the original version, Sebastian Shaw plays this Force spirit in addition to an unmasked Vader. Hayden Christensen later played Anakin in the prequel trilogy films Attack of the Clones and Revenge of the Sith. To reflect this, the 2004 edition of Return of the Jedi replaced Shaw's appearance as the Force spirit with Christensen.[112] Some considered the change controversial,[87] with Den of Geek rating it as the worst change to the original trilogy.[56] The Digital Bits notes that the 2019 restoration made it more obvious where Anakin's head was replaced.[109] The scene received positive retrospective reappraisal in 2023, following Christensen reprising his role as the Force spirit of Anakin Skywalker in the live-action miniseries Ahsoka.[113][114]

The Phantom Menace

The DVD released in 2001 features a longer cut of the podrace sequence,[19] as well as a brief scene on Coruscant focusing on Anakin and Jar Jar Binks.[115] The 2011 Blu-ray incorporates a CGI Yoda.[116] For the 2012 3D re-release, the end of Anakin's magnetic wand was redesigned in one shot of the podrace.[27]

Podrace sequence

The extended podrace includes a longer introduction of the racers and the second lap of the race,[117] which Screen Rant says does not contribute to the story, and potentially negatively affects the film's pacing. Additionally, shots including Watto cheering for Anakin's rival Sebulba were removed for home media releases.[115][117]

CGI Yoda

In the original version of The Phantom Menace, a puppet was used to portray Yoda except in two wide shots which required CGI.[118][119] This was changed for the 2011 release, with the puppet being replaced with a CGI model, similar to those used for the film's sequels, Attack of the Clones and Revenge of the Sith.[116]

Attack of the Clones

A few special effects which were not ready for the initial wide release were completed for release in digital-projection theaters.[lower-alpha 5] The DVD features the digital version[21] with some extended lines of dialogue.[22][23] The 2011 edition features a small editing change to the Coruscant speeder chase, adds a voiceover to Anakin's vision of Shmi,[11] and changes the order of shots depicting Count Dooku's escape.[120]

Revenge of the Sith

The theatrical release had a diagonal wipe from Obi-Wan leaving Mustafar to Anakin using his hand to crawl from the lava. The DVD changed this to a direct cut, which was reverted on the Blu-ray.[26] The latter release also has additional clone trooper dialogue[11] as they land on Utapau, and added moss to the treehouse on Kashyyyk.[121] The film's filming led the filmmakers to discuss possible changes in past films or even in further versions of the film; Lucas was impressed enough with the Creature Shop's radio-controlled mask for the background character of Senator Meena Tills that he briefly considered to replace the footage of Admiral Ackbar's mask in Return of the Jedi with Meena's one due to always feeling that Ackbar's was compromised despite being done with the latest puppetry technology available back then,[122] while McCallum expressed his hopes in the film's audio commentary that, as part of a hypothetical six-episode DVD box set, for Lucas to restore a removed scene of Yoda arriving at Dagobah to begin his self-imposed exile, which Lucas cut to prevent the film from having "too many endings".[123]

Reception

Various media outlets have called attention to the changes deemed the most offensive and condemned them. These include: in A New Hope, making Greedo shoot first and the restored Jabba scene; in The Empire Strikes Back, changes to the Emperor's dialogue; in Return of the Jedi, the new song in Jabba's palace, Vader yelling "No!" at the climax, and Christensen replacing Shaw as Anakin's spirit.[56][39][11][17]

In 2015, Lance Ulanoff of Mashable viewed the original theatrical print of Star Wars submitted to the Library of Congress, and noted merit to Lucas's belief that technology did not allow him to achieve his vision, citing a visible marquee around Leia's ship "so jarring that it temporarily pulls me out of the film" because the original print is "lack[ing] the seamless quality [he has] come to expect from sci-fi and fantasy". Despite this, Ulanoff wrote that he "hate[s] each and every one" of the later added CGI effects.[29] In 2017, a writer argued that the Special Edition changes to the original Star Wars "stripped the film of every aspect that it had won its Academy Awards for", including those for Best Visual Effects, Best Production Design, and Best Original Score.[32]

A smaller number of changes have been cited as an improvement.[76] A 2015 Polygon article asserts that "there was a solid logic behind" a number of minor changes, such as adding windows to Cloud City or sparks to Jango Fett's jetpack, saying these "angered, to a close approximation, nobody".[52] A New Hope's restored Biggs scene has garnered mostly favorable feedback.[75][76][68][17] In 2021, Screen Rant praised special effects additions to A New Hope, including the CGI dewback replacement, the Mos Eisley establishing shots, and the explosions of Alderaan and the Death Star.[68] In 2022, citing Lucas's opinion that the Special Edition had improved A New Hope from representing 60% of his vision to 80%, an io9 writer argued that the film could be further altered "to turn that 80% into 100%".[124]

Legacy

A New Hope and The Empire Strikes Back producer Gary Kurtz spoke against changing films retroactively, saying in a 2002 interview that he would not change his other movies that he had come up later ideas for. He stated, "I'm just not a great believer in messing with what is done. It may not be perfect, and as I said a long time ago, there's nothing that is." Speaking at length about the Special Editions, he said,[125]

... fixing a few matte lines and adding a couple of spaceships into shots is fine. I don't think anybody would notice that. But actually adding scenes that don't make any difference ... and all of those digitally enhanced shots of robots floating around and creatures walking through the frame ... call attention to themselves. Are much worse, actually, I think. Primarily because CGI work ... done by ILM, which is the best there is ... does not fit in with the mechanical style of the original film.

George Lucas's name is sometimes used as a shorthand verb regarding the retroactive making of changes to motion pictures.[126][127] In early 2002, filmmaker (and friend of Lucas) Steven Spielberg re-released E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial in a digitally altered 20th-anniversary Special Edition, which notably replaced guns carried by federal agents with walkie-talkies.[128][129][lower-alpha 24] This prompted the creators of South Park to parody both Spielberg and Lucas's changes to their films in an episode of their show.[131] Other adult animation series and stand-up comedians have targeted retroactive changes to Star Wars, including Family Guy, which in 2007 lampooned Christensen's snippy appearance as a spirit,[132] and Brian Posehn, who argued in his 2017 special that the original trilogy "already was special".[133]

Lucas's changes have come to be cited as a primary point of reference for retroactive changes to other films.[134][135] By contrast, some media outlets positively reviewed the 2020 4K release of Peter Jackson's The Lord of the Rings trilogy, which was remastered and adjusted for color consistency with The Hobbit trilogy, but not otherwise significantly altered.[136][137][138]

Asked why he was opposed to releasing the original versions of the films alongside the modified versions, Lucas stated in 2004: "To me, [the original movie] doesn't really exist anymore. ... I'm sorry you saw half a completed film and fell in love with it. But I want it to be the way I want it to be."[139] A number of errors remain in the latest version of the films.[140][141][142] For instance, Sebulba is unrendered in a brief shot in The Phantom Menace, which special-effects supervisor John Knoll called attention to in the film's 2001 DVD commentary. Screen Rant says this "highlights how George Lucas' motivations for tweaking the Star Wars movies are more about improving and updating than removing imperfections."[143]

In 2011, young Anakin actor Jake Lloyd stated that, according to Star Wars prequel sound editor Matthew Wood, there was a six-hour cut of The Phantom Menace that was "mind-blowingly awesome".[144]

In 2019, Kathleen Kennedy, president of Lucasfilm since the 2012 acquisition of the company by Disney, stated that she would not make alterations to Lucas's original trilogy, because "those will always remain his."[145] While promoting The Rise of Skywalker, director J. J. Abrams expressed his hopes that the original versions of the trilogy would be officially released, but said that the powers that be had told him "that that's not necessarily possible".[146][lower-alpha 25] On whether he thought the sequel trilogy should be altered at some point, Abrams stated, "I respect anyone who feels like they want to go back and adjust and add; I get that. But I also feel like ... [when] you're done with a thing, ... that's what it is."[147] Contrarily, some media outlets have called for the climax of The Rise of Skywalker to be altered to show the Force spirits of the Jedi who aid Rey.[148][149] Fan pleas for a director's cut of the film trended on social media following the release of Zack Snyder's Justice League.[150][lower-alpha 26]

Some sources have incorrectly claimed the existence of other alternate versions of the films. In 2020, a YouTube clip purported to show an audience reaction to The Empire Strikes Back's twist ending, adding "Luke" to Vader's famous "I am your father" line—a common false memory of the dialogue.[153][154] Additionally, in May 2021, The Rise of Skywalker was misbelieved to have been color corrected on Disney+ to reduce its green hue, apparently due to confusion over whether Night Shift software was active.[155] Following the release of many Marvel Cinematic Universe films in the IMAX format on Disney+, SlashGear suggested that The Force Awakens's IMAX version could be released in the future.[33]

In 2023, when asked if he had the clout to influence Lucasfilm to release the original cuts of the original trilogy, The Mandalorian creator Jon Favreau answered, "Do you think anybody but ... the people who grew up with it ... would care?" He went on to explain his view that "younger people have a whole different perception of what Star Wars is."[156]

Notes

  1. Later titled Star Wars: Episode IV – A New Hope
  2. Some releases additionally had minor aspect ratio changes.[11]
  3. Lucas has stated that "There are two or three shots that are really bad and I know that [1977's Star Wars] is going to be judged on that. I was embarrassed. In 1993, the 20th anniversary was coming up and that was the impetus for doing a Special Edition of A New Hope – to bring it up to the standard we were aiming for." Lucas has also stated, "Once I had started redoing the first film, it was such a good experience, I said "we should go back and finish the other two as well".[18]
  4. Some state that the changes were intended to modernize the films and create consistency with the prequel trilogy.[11]
  5. 1 2 These include the addition of sparks to Jango Fett's jetpack just before he is beheaded by Mace Windu and Anakin Skywalker using his mechanical hand to take Padmé's hand during the wedding scene.[20][21]
  6. This was reversed for the 2011 Blu-ray.[26]
  7. According to Empire, "the quality of the transfer is laughably bad, with a non-anamorphic letterboxed 4:3 aspect ratio creating huge black bars on all sides of the film, if watched on a widescreen TV."[11]
  8. The 20th Century Fox logo and fanfare were removed from The Empire Strikes Back, Return of the Jedi, and the prequel films as a result of Disney's 2012 acquisition of Lucasfilm. It remained on A New Hope as Fox retained the full rights to the film after the acquisition.[28]
  9. In 1989, the original release of Star Wars was selected for preservation in the National Film Registry.[30] In 2014, it still did not have a "working copy" (a copy available for public viewing) of the 1977 film; George Lucas refused to submit the original, stating that he no longer authorized the release of the theatrical version.[31] Lucasfilm offered the 1997 Special Edition release, but the Registry refused it as the first published version must be accepted.[32] The Library subsequently used a 35 mm print of the original version of the film (which had been submitted in 1978 as part of the film's copyright deposit) to make a digital working copy.[31][29]
  10. The 20th Century Fox logo and fanfare were restored to the five films they had been removed from in 2015 as a result of Disney's acquisition of 21st Century Fox earlier in 2019.[28]
  11. A Wired article criticizes the additional shots, saying, "in a movie that has focused almost every scene on the droids, it's not necessary to have shots that don't feature them, particularly medium shots of people wandering aimlessly." The article further notes that "the dewback model was rebuilt for the prequels, and the test model was left front-and-center in a classic film."[17]
  12. Yahoo! says "Sound designer Ben Burtt's original effect is haunting and memorable, but Lucas swapped it out with a higher-pitched noise for the 2004 DVD release, then again with another sound for the 2011 Blu-ray."[39] Wire notes that the latter sound "hilariously sounds like someone shouting into an empty bathroom."[17]
  13. Wired notes that "There is no visible way for R2 to have gotten into this cave to hide from the Tusken Raiders."[17]
  14. The computer-generated Imperial landing craft was created for the 1997 release of the film, but first appeared in Shadows of the Empire media.[44]
  15. The close-up is composed of cropped footage used a few seconds before.[35] The dialogue, transcribed by fans as "maclunkey", is also spoken in The Phantom Menace, where the apparently Huttese phrase is subtitled "This will be the end of you."[46][47]
  16. The change was made by Lucas before the 2012 sale of his company to Disney.[48]
  17. In Red River, John Wayne's character, Thomas Dunson, shoots and kills a Mexican whose boss Dunson admits he is stealing land from.[49]
  18. Wired writes, "The one interesting part of the [full version of the cut scene] was how Red Leader mentioned flying with Luke's father, a possible tie to the prequels ... cut out by having a technician walk across the screen and hiding the cut dialog with a time jump. Unfortunately, this is done poorly, as the missing time is reflected by R2's literal jump by several feet in his rise to the X-wing."[17]
  19. According to WhatCulture and Wired, the additional shots show a redesigned and more fully realized wampa—which may reflect the original intent of the filmmakers—but the addition unnecessarily altered the decision to leave the monster largely to the imagination.[79][17]
  20. Prequel actor Hayden Christensen stood in as Vader during the filming,[82] which occurred during the production of Revenge of the Sith (2005).[83]
  21. Wired criticizes the change, writing, "This might make sense if it wasn't for the fact that accents aren't genetic. Jango died 25 years earlier, it's highly unlikely Boba would still sound exactly like his father, even if they were genetically identical."[17] Fett was later reprised by Morrison for the post-Return of the Jedi live-action streaming series The Mandalorian and The Book of Boba Fett.[88][89]
  22. A Wired writer opines that "The frantic pace of our heroes trying to escape is now interrupted by shots of characters we've never seen and will never see again."[17]
  23. Owen Good writes that the new material in Jabba's palace is "an overproduced intrusion that takes twice as long to add nothing" and distracts from the scene's intention: to establish the trapdoor leading to the rancor and the Hutt's deadliness.[52] A Wired writer argues that the additions crowded the scene with unsatisfactory CGI.[99] Den of Geek notes that the change negatively altered the tone of the scene and only "replaced one flawed effect with another", writing that "What was once a low-key yet appealing background moment in the movie's first act [has] grown into ... an in-your-face audio-visual spectacle".[100]
  24. Spielberg later stated that he would not digitally alter his films in the future and insisted that viewers watch the original version of E.T..[130]
  25. Abrams further said that when making The Force Awakens, he had gotten into a disagreement about the dialogue between Vader and the Emperor in The Empire Strikes Back before realizing that different versions of the film were being referred to; he cited the Despecialized Editions of the films, while the other party had recalled the reworded dialogue.[146]
  26. Shortly after the release of The Rise of Skywalker, a rumor was circulated concerning an alleged "Abrams cut" of the film, which was quickly debunked.[151] A subsequent unsubstantiated rumor claimed that George Lucas would release his own version.[152]

References

  1. 1 2 Pollock, Dale (1983). Skywalking: The Life and Films of George Lucas. London: Elm Tree Books. p. 98. ISBN 0-241-11034-3.
  2. 1 2 Coate, Michael (August 1, 2013). "Where Were You In '73? Remembering American Graffiti On Its 40th Anniversary". The Digital Bits. Archived from the original on August 9, 2013. Retrieved December 27, 2021.
  3. Lucas, George (February 28, 1988). "George Lucas Speaks Out Against Altering Films in 1988". Washington Post. Archived from the original on January 4, 2024. Retrieved January 4, 2024.
  4. Hill, Paul; Preston, Henry (October 11, 2004). "Back to the Future with 'THX 1138'". Animation World Network (Interview). Interviewed by Bill Desowitz. Archived from the original on October 28, 2021. Retrieved December 27, 2021.
  5. "Colorization Issue May Be Decided by Committee Today". Los Angeles Times. August 4, 1988. Archived from the original on December 30, 2022. Retrieved December 30, 2022.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 6 "George Lucas". Catalog of Feature Films. American Film Institute. Archived from the original on March 28, 2014. Retrieved July 20, 2017.
  7. Burtt, Ben (2004). Star Wars: Episode IV – A New Hope, audio commentary (DVD). 20th Century Fox Home Entertainment. Event occurs at 1:23.
  8. "SW Super 8 Film--Color, Silent". theswca.com. Star Wars Collectors Archive. 2014. Archived from the original on March 4, 2021. Retrieved March 18, 2021.
  9. 1 2 Seastrom, Lucas (May 18, 2020). "Empire at 40 | Some Last-Minute Magic: Changes to the Original Ending of Star Wars: The Empire Strikes Back". StarWars.com. Archived from the original on December 13, 2021. Retrieved May 21, 2020.
  10. Matessino, Michael (January–February 1997). "70mm Variations Strike Back". Film Score Monthly. Vol. 2, no. 1. p. 15. Archived from the original on October 18, 2017. Retrieved May 19, 2017.
  11. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Kirby, Ben (January 31, 2017). "Who Shot First? The Complete List Of Star Wars Changes". Empire. Archived from the original on May 7, 2017. Retrieved May 19, 2017.
  12. 1 2 3 "Star Wars: Episode IV A New Hope". Lucasfilm. Archived from the original on February 15, 2014. Retrieved July 20, 2017.
  13. Dracula, Matt (November 10, 2015). "Collectibles from the Outer Rim: Star Wars VHS Releases!". StarWars.com. Archived from the original on December 3, 2021. Retrieved December 13, 2020.
  14. Daly, Steve (September 15, 1995). "Video Review: 'The Star Wars Trilogy'". Entertainment Weekly. Archived from the original on November 2, 2015. Retrieved July 19, 2017.
  15. Fitzpatrick, Eileen; Goldstein, Seth (July 1, 1997). "Video at 'Miracle' Price; Last Shot for 'Star Wars'". Billboard. p. 107. Archived from the original on July 25, 2019. Retrieved July 19, 2017 via Google Books.
  16. Magid, Ron (February 1997). "An Expanded Universe". American Society of Cinematographers. p. 4. Archived from the original on April 11, 2008. Retrieved August 24, 2009.
  17. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Stewart, Drew (March 31, 2020). "Disney+ Should Offer the Star Wars Original Cuts—All of Them". Wired. Archived from the original on January 21, 2022. Retrieved April 1, 2020.
  18. Duncan, Paul (2020). The Star Wars Archives: Episodes I–III – 1999–2005. Cologne: Taschen. ISBN 978-3-8365-6344-4. OCLC 1220858943. Archived from the original on August 13, 2022. Retrieved January 15, 2022.
  19. 1 2 DuPont, Alexandra (2001). "Star Wars: Episode I: The Phantom Menace". The DVD Journal. Archived from the original on December 4, 2018. Retrieved December 6, 2018.
  20. Pooley, Jack (September 7, 2021). "20 Things You Didn't Know About Star Wars: Attack Of The Clones: #5". WhatCulture. Archived from the original on September 9, 2021. Retrieved September 9, 2021.
  21. 1 2 3 Lucas, George (2002). Star Wars: Episode II – Attack of the Clones audio commentary (DVD). 20th Century Fox Home Entertainment. Event occurs at 112, 135.
  22. 1 2 Hunt, Bill (October 9, 2002). "DVD Review - Star Wars: Episode II - Attack of the Clones". The Digital Bits. Archived from the original on September 30, 2019. Retrieved September 30, 2019.
  23. 1 2 "Return To Tatooine". T-bone's Star Wars Universe. October 4, 2011. Archived from the original on September 30, 2019. Retrieved September 30, 2019.
  24. "Making it BIG: Episode II -- The IMAX Experience". StarWars.com. Archived from the original on October 23, 2004. Retrieved September 17, 2022.
  25. Kallay, William (December 2002). "An Interview With Jim Ward, V.P. of Marketing, Lucasfilm, Ltd". in70mm.com. Archived from the original on September 20, 2022. Retrieved September 17, 2022. ... it seemed like 1.81:1 was the best balance ... without having to get too dramatic on a pan-and-scan basis. ... We used the pan-and-scan version of the DVD as sort of a guideline.
  26. 1 2 3 "Star Wars: Episode III - Revenge of the Sith (Comparison: DVD Version - Blu-ray Version)". Movie-Censorship.com. Archived from the original on July 27, 2020. Retrieved November 17, 2019.
  27. 1 2 "Star Wars - Episode I: The Phantom Menace (Comparison: Blu-ray Edition (Fox) - 4K-Remastered Blu-ray (Disney))". Movie-Censorship.com. May 27, 2020. Archived from the original on February 10, 2023. Retrieved February 10, 2023.
  28. 1 2 3 4 Bui, Hoai-Tran (November 12, 2019). "Disney+ Changes Original 'Star Wars' Trilogy to Include Classic Fox Fanfare and Newly Tweaked Han/Greedo Confrontation". /Film. Archived from the original on November 12, 2019. Retrieved November 12, 2019.
  29. 1 2 3 4 Unaloff, Lance (December 17, 2015). "The search for the 'Star Wars' George Lucas doesn't want you to see". Mashable. Archived from the original on October 13, 2016. Retrieved May 19, 2017.
  30. "Complete National Film Registry Listing". Library of Congress. Archived from the original on December 17, 2014. Retrieved May 19, 2017.
  31. 1 2 3 4 5 Eveleth, Rose (August 27, 2014). "The Star Wars George Lucas Doesn't Want You To See". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on August 28, 2014. Retrieved May 17, 2017.
  32. 1 2 Abramo, Donya (February 23, 2017). "Unaltered Star Wars theatrical cuts rumored to be released: Why it's culturally important". Hypable. Archived from the original on August 13, 2022. Retrieved May 19, 2017.
  33. 1 2 Burns, Chris (November 8, 2021). "IMAX Enhanced Format Launching On Disney+ With These 13 Movies". SlashGear. Static Media. Archived from the original on June 30, 2022. Retrieved May 17, 2022.
  34. Hunt, Bill (December 24, 2019). "Star Wars: The Empire Strikes Back – A Visual Guide to Changes, Fixes, and Tweaks in the Disney+ 4K Version". The Digital Bits. Archived from the original on December 25, 2019. Retrieved December 25, 2019.
  35. 1 2 3 4 Caicoya, Bea (November 24, 2019). "Star Wars: Every Disney+ Change Made to A New Hope". Comic Book Resources. Archived from the original on November 28, 2019. Retrieved November 24, 2019.
  36. 1 2 "30 pieces of trivia about Star Wars". BBC. May 23, 2007. Archived from the original on September 11, 2007. Retrieved July 20, 2017.
  37. Anatomy of a Dewback (1997). Featurette produced for StarWars.com.
  38. Moran, Sarah (October 24, 2015). "Star Wars Original Trilogy Changes: The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly". Screen Rant. Archived from the original on November 2, 2020. Retrieved October 30, 2020.
  39. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Watkins, Gwynne (July 29, 2015). "15 Changes to the Original 'Star Wars' Trilogy That Still Make Us Crazy". Yahoo!. Archived from the original on July 2, 2016. Retrieved February 28, 2019.
  40. Smith, Tony (December 17, 2015). "How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Star Wars Special Editions". The Register. Archived from the original on January 28, 2020. Retrieved February 26, 2020.
  41. Tyler, Adrienne (August 12, 2020). "George Lucas Fixed Star Wars Binary Sunset Continuity Error In 2004". Screen Rant. Archived from the original on June 6, 2022. Retrieved August 13, 2020.
  42. Hunt, Bill (December 4, 2019). "Star Wars: A New Hope – A Visual Guide to Changes, Fixes, and Tweaks in the Disney+ 4K Version". The Digital Bits. Archived from the original on December 25, 2019. Retrieved February 26, 2020.
  43. Williams, Rohan (November 11, 2016). "20 secrets of Shadows of the Empire". Force Material. Archived from the original on February 16, 2020. Retrieved August 14, 2020.
  44. "Databank | Imperial landing craft". StarWars.com. Archived from the original on August 27, 2005. Retrieved September 7, 2019.
  45. Hibberd, James (November 12, 2019). "Disney+ reveals bizarre change to iconic 'Star Wars' scene". EW.com. Archived from the original on November 12, 2019. Retrieved November 12, 2019.
  46. "In Latest Version of Star Wars' "Han Shot First" Scene, George Lucas Adds "Maclunkey"". Slate Magazine. November 12, 2019. Archived from the original on May 29, 2020. Retrieved November 17, 2019.
  47. 1 2 3 Alexander, Julia (November 12, 2019). "George Lucas changed Han Solo's scene with Greedo in Star Wars: A New Hope, Disney confirmed". The Verge. Archived from the original on November 12, 2019. Retrieved November 12, 2019.
  48. Red River (1948). Events occurs at 17. Scene transcript Archived December 19, 2021, at the Wayback Machine via Filmsite.org. Retrieved December 18, 2021.
  49. 1 2 Stuever, Hank (December 5, 2015). "George Lucas: To feel the true force of 'Star Wars,' he had to learn to let it go". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on May 20, 2017. Retrieved May 17, 2017.
  50. Patches, Matt (June 1, 2018). "Solo: A Star Wars Story makes the 'Han shot first' debate even messier". Polygon. Archived from the original on March 9, 2020. Retrieved November 26, 2018.
  51. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Polo, Susana; Hall, Charlie; Good, Owen; Tach, Dave (December 17, 2015). "The Worst Things in Star Wars". Polygon. Archived from the original on December 28, 2016. Retrieved July 19, 2017.
  52. Block, Alex Ben (February 9, 2012). "5 Questions With George Lucas: Controversial 'Star Wars' Changes, SOPA and 'Indiana Jones 5'". The Hollywood Reporter. Archived from the original on February 18, 2012. Retrieved May 17, 2017. The controversy over who shot first, Greedo or Han Solo, in Episode IV, what I did was try to clean up the confusion, but obviously it upset people because they wanted Solo to be a cold-blooded killer, but he actually isn't. It had been done in all close-ups and it was confusing about who did what to whom. I put a little wider shot in there that made it clear that Greedo is the one who shot first, but everyone wanted to think that Han shot first, because they wanted to think that he actually just gunned him down.
  53. "Copy of original Star Wars script discovered in UNB library". CBC.ca. June 8, 2015. Archived from the original on June 8, 2015. Retrieved October 4, 2015.
  54. Sacks, Ethan (May 5, 2016). "EXCLUSIVE: Greedo actor wants 'Star Wars' to restore Han Solo shooting first scene: 'It does give him a little more glory'". Daily News. New York. Archived from the original on May 6, 2016. Retrieved May 5, 2016.
  55. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Cornish, James T. (April 4, 2011). "The 10 Worst Crimes Against the Original Star Wars Trilogy". Den of Geek!. Archived from the original on June 6, 2012. Retrieved July 26, 2017.
  56. 1 2 3 4 5 Failes, Ian (January 31, 2017). "You're a wonderful human being: re-visiting CG Jabba 20 years later". vfxblog. Archived from the original on February 4, 2017. Retrieved December 20, 2021.
  57. Placido, Dani Di (October 31, 2017). "Jar Jar Binks Actor Claims His Role In Cinema History Has Been Forgotten". Forbes. Archived from the original on July 23, 2021. Retrieved April 17, 2019.
  58. Romano, Steven (September 17, 2015). "6 Fascinating Behind-The-Scenes Concepts From The Star Wars Trilogy Special Edition". StarWars.com. Archived from the original on September 20, 2015. Retrieved September 1, 2023.
  59. Agar, Chris (July 27, 2020). "Star Wars: Why George Lucas Added Jabba the Hutt & Boba Fett Into New Hope". Screen Rant. Archived from the original on August 2, 2020. Retrieved April 17, 2021.
  60. 1 2 Miller, David (November 25, 2021). "Why The Star Wars Special Editions Are So Hated". Screen Rant. Archived from the original on November 25, 2021. Retrieved November 26, 2021.
  61. Schaefer, Sandy (April 27, 2022). "Why A Pivotal Harrison Ford Star Wars Scene Sat Unfinished For 20 Years". /Film. Archived from the original on May 13, 2022. Retrieved May 13, 2022.
  62. Counter, Ben (July 29, 2017). "Star Wars: 10 Things You Probably Didn't Know About Jabba The Hutt: #1". WhatCulture. Archived from the original on August 2, 2017. Retrieved December 12, 2021.
  63. Lucas, George (2004). Star Wars: Episode IV – A New Hope audio commentary (DVD). 20th Century Fox Home Entertainment. Event occurs at 53.
  64. Singer, Matt (January 6, 2022). "'Star Wars' Hutts Should Never, Ever Be CGI". ScreenCrush. Archived from the original on February 2, 2022. Retrieved February 14, 2022.
  65. Tyler, Adrienne (November 6, 2019). "Every Version Of The Original Star Wars Movies Explained". Screen Rant. Archived from the original on November 7, 2019. Retrieved January 12, 2022.
  66. 1 2 Moran, Sarah (October 24, 2015). "Star Wars Original Trilogy Changes: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly". Screen Rant. Archived from the original on October 25, 2015. Retrieved January 16, 2022.
  67. 1 2 3 4 Miller, David (October 15, 2021). "How Star Wars: A New Hope's Special Edition Actually Improved The Movie". Screen Rant. Archived from the original on October 16, 2021. Retrieved October 16, 2021.
  68. Leadbeater, Alex (September 1, 2015). "10 Most Pointless Changes To The Star Wars Movies You Never Even Noticed: #7". WhatCulture. Archived from the original on May 21, 2016. Retrieved November 26, 2021.
  69. "Which stormtrooper bonked his head on a door? Investigating a Star Wars mystery". Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. October 4, 2019. Archived from the original on November 26, 2021. Retrieved November 26, 2021.
  70. Miller, Leon (May 24, 2018). "Star Wars: 20 Crazy Behind-The-Scenes Facts About Lightsabers". Screen Rant. Archived from the original on November 11, 2020. Retrieved December 16, 2020.
  71. Hunt, Bill (December 4, 2019). "Star Wars: A New Hope – A Visual Guide to Changes, Fixes, and Tweaks in the Disney+ 4K Version". The Digital Bits. Archived from the original on September 22, 2020. Retrieved December 16, 2020.
  72. "Can't Even Get the Special Edition Right". Saving Star Wars. Archived from the original on August 19, 2010. Retrieved January 16, 2022.
  73. Parker, Luke (November 18, 2019). "Star Wars: Obi-Wan vs. Darth Vader Has New Lightsaber Effects On Disney+". Screen Rant. Archived from the original on January 13, 2020. Retrieved December 16, 2020.
  74. 1 2 Vanderbilt, Mike (May 11, 2015). "Finally, Star Wars character Biggs Darklighter gets his due". The A.V. Club. Archived from the original on July 13, 2017. Retrieved July 26, 2017.
  75. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Whitbrook, James (September 28, 2015). "6 Ways the Star Wars Special Editions Actually Improved The Original Trilogy". io9. Archived from the original on August 1, 2017. Retrieved July 26, 2017.
  76. Scott Chernoff (June 1998). "In the Star Wars Universe: Drewe Henley – Leader of the Pack". Star Wars Insider Issue 38.
  77. Sciretta, Peter (December 22, 2016). "46 Rogue One Easter Eggs: How Many Of These Did You Catch?". /Film. Archived from the original on October 29, 2021. Retrieved September 1, 2023.
  78. Leadbeater, Alex (September 1, 2015). "10 Most Pointless Changes To The Star Wars Movies You Never Even Noticed: #6". WhatCulture. Archived from the original on September 23, 2016. Retrieved November 26, 2021.
  79. "Star Wars: The Changes". dvdactive. Archived from the original on July 29, 2012. Retrieved March 4, 2019.
  80. "Lucasfilm Defends DVD Changes". Sci-Fi Wire. Archived from the original on October 12, 2007. Retrieved February 18, 2007.
  81. J.W. Rinzler's Skywalker Ranch Stories. Rebel Force Radio. November 30, 2020. 19 minutes in. Archived from the original on December 11, 2021. Retrieved September 1, 2023 via YouTube.
  82. Kaminski, Michael (2008) [2007]. The Secret History of Star Wars (3.0 ed.).
  83. 1 2 Singer, Matt (May 4, 2020). "This Is The Worst Post-Release Change to Any 'Star Wars' Movie". ScreenCrush. Archived from the original on October 4, 2020. Retrieved October 13, 2020.
  84. 1 2 Romano, Nick (January 2, 2016). "Jason Wingreen dead: All in the Family, Star Wars actor was 95". Entertainment Weekly. Archived from the original on August 13, 2022. Retrieved May 18, 2017.
  85. "Fett, Jango". StarWars.com. Lucasfilm. Archived from the original on December 16, 2008. Retrieved May 18, 2017.
  86. 1 2 3 Hyde, Douglas (September 23, 2004). "Five major changes in the 'Star Wars' DVD". CNN. Archived from the original on March 3, 2017. Retrieved May 18, 2017.
  87. 1 2 Thorne, Will (December 4, 2020). "'The Mandalorian': Has Boba Fett Got His Mojo Back? And More Burning Questions From 'The Tragedy'". Variety. Archived from the original on December 4, 2020. Retrieved December 4, 2020.
  88. 1 2 Davids, Brian (January 6, 2022). "'The Book of Boba Fett' Stars on Their Improbable Journey to the Center of the 'Star Wars' Galaxy". The Hollywood Reporter. Archived from the original on January 6, 2022. Retrieved January 15, 2022.
  89. Leadbeater, Alex (September 1, 2015). "10 Most Pointless Changes To The Star Wars Movies You Never Even Noticed: #5". WhatCulture. Archived from the original on September 26, 2016. Retrieved November 26, 2021.
  90. Duncan, Paul (2020). The Star Wars Archives: Episodes I–III – 1999–2005. Cologne: Taschen. p. 27. ISBN 978-3-8365-6344-4. OCLC 1220858943. Archived from the original on August 13, 2022. Retrieved January 15, 2022.
  91. 1 2 Edwards, Ted (1999). The Unauthorized Star Wars Compendium: The Complete Guide to the Movies, Comic Books, Novels, and More. Little, Brown and Company. p. 162. ISBN 0316329290.
  92. "Return of the Jedi Special Edition: What has Changed?". StarWars.com. January 15, 1997. Archived from the original on April 7, 2008. Retrieved July 10, 2006.
  93. "Star Wars: Episode VI | Return of the Jedi Special Edition - What has Changed?". StarWars.com. January 15, 1997. Archived from the original on April 7, 2008. Retrieved September 9, 2020.
  94. Leadbeater, Alex (September 1, 2015). "10 Most Pointless Changes To The Star Wars Movies You Never Even Noticed: #3". WhatCulture. Archived from the original on September 25, 2016. Retrieved November 26, 2021.
  95. Hunt, Bill (January 29, 2020). "Star Wars: Return of the Jedi – A Visual Guide to Changes, Fixes, and Tweaks in the Disney+ 4K Version". The Digital Bits. Archived from the original on February 2, 2020. Retrieved February 4, 2020.
  96. Leadbeater, Alex (September 1, 2015). "10 Most Pointless Changes To The Star Wars Movies You Never Even Noticed: #10". WhatCulture. Archived from the original on May 21, 2016. Retrieved November 26, 2021.
  97. 1 2 "Max Rebo Band: Behind the Scenes". StarWars.com. Lucasfilm. Archived from the original on December 15, 2006. Retrieved July 19, 2017.
  98. 1 2 3 Raftery, Brian (December 21, 2015). "The 9 Best Songs Ever Played in a Star Wars Movie". Wired. Archived from the original on December 22, 2015. Retrieved July 19, 2017.
  99. 1 2 Lambie, Ryan (January 22, 2016). "Star Wars: the changing face of Sy Snootles & the Rebo band". Den of Geek!. Archived from the original on July 30, 2017. Retrieved July 20, 2017.
  100. Spry, Jeff (November 17, 2014). "Image of the Day: Vintage helmet-less Boba Fett". SyFy.com. Archived from the original on January 21, 2021. Retrieved December 15, 2020.
  101. "Confessions of a Bounty Hunter: An interview with Jeremy Bulloch". starstore.com. September 10, 1998. Archived from the original on July 16, 2001. Retrieved December 26, 2021.
  102. Lucas, George (2004). Star Wars: Episode VI – Return of the Jedi audio commentary (DVD). 20th Century Fox Home Entertainment. Event occurs at 33:45.
  103. 1 2 Popolo, Meredith (September 16, 2011). "Top 10 Worst Changes Made to Star Wars". PC Magazine. Archived from the original on May 29, 2017. Retrieved May 19, 2017.
  104. 1 2 Robinette, Eric (October 11, 2020). "'Star Wars': Why Do People Hate Vader's Added Line in 'ROTJ' So Much?". Showbiz Cheat Sheet. Archived from the original on October 14, 2020. Retrieved October 13, 2020.
  105. Saxton, Curtis (April 12, 2005). "STAR WARS: Injuries of Darth Vader". TheForce.Net. Archived from the original on November 12, 2020. Retrieved December 15, 2020.
  106. King, Darryn (December 12, 2016). "The Star Wars Saga's Secret Weapon: A Visual Effects Nerd with a Big Story to Tell". Vanity Fair. Archived from the original on November 11, 2020. Retrieved July 20, 2017.
  107. Clark, Mark (2015). Star Wars FAQ: Everything Left to Know About the Trilogy That Changed the Movies. Milwaukee, WI: Applause Theatre & Cinema Books. ISBN 978-1480360181. OCLC 907104091.
  108. 1 2 Hunt, Bill (January 29, 2020). "Star Wars: Return of the Jedi – A Visual Guide to Changes, Fixes, and Tweaks in the Disney+ 4K Version". The Digital Bits. Archived from the original on February 2, 2020. Retrieved February 2, 2020.
  109. Fry, Jason (2014). Star Wars in 100 Scenes. London, United Kingdom: DK Publishing. p. 205. ISBN 9781465420121.
  110. Star Wars: Episode III – Revenge of the Sith | Unscripted | Hayden Christensen, George Lucas. Moviefone Interview
  111. Lucas, George (2005). "Star Wars: Episode III – Revenge of the Sith | Unscripted | Hayden Christensen, George Lucas". Moviefone. Event occurs at 8. Archived from the original on December 28, 2015. Retrieved January 11, 2022 via YouTube. The idea was that [Anakin's] inner person would go back to where we left it off, when it turned to the dark side ... so when you come back to the good side of the Force, it's your former persona that survives, not the Darth Vader persona.
  112. Miller, Dave (September 8, 2023). "Ahsoka's Anakin Skywalker Doubles Down On One Controversial Return Of The Jedi Change". Screen Rant. Retrieved September 8, 2023.
  113. Denni (September 9, 2023). "The Mind-Blowing Revelation Behind Ahsoka's Anakin Skywalker and the Controversial Return of the Jedi Change". Hoc Marketing. Retrieved September 10, 2023.
  114. 1 2 Tyler, Adrienne (June 20, 2020). "Star Wars: Every Phantom Menace Change George Lucas Made In 2001". Screen Rant. Archived from the original on June 21, 2020. Retrieved June 23, 2020.
  115. 1 2 Vary, Adam B. (December 19, 2017). "How SPOILER! Wound Up In 'The Last Jedi'". Buzzfeed. Archived from the original on January 2, 2018. Retrieved January 1, 2018.
  116. 1 2 "Star Wars: Episode I - The Phantom Menace (Comparison: Theatrical Cut - DVD Edition)". Movie-Censorship.com. June 21, 2008. Archived from the original on February 10, 2023. Retrieved February 10, 2023.
  117. Squires, Scott; Coleman, Rob (2001). Star Wars: Episode I – The Phantom Menace audio commentary (DVD). 20th Century Fox Home Entertainment. Event occurs at 2:06:30–2:07:30.
  118. Coleman, Rob (2002). Star Wars: Episode II – Attack of the Clones audio commentary (DVD). 20th Century Fox Home Entertainment. Event occurs at 4:45.
  119. "Star Wars: Episode II - Attack of the Clones (Comparison: DVD-Version - Blu-ray-Version)". Movie-Censorship.com. Archived from the original on July 27, 2020. Retrieved May 23, 2020.
  120. "STAR WARS CHANGES (4 of 4) -- The Prequels". Film Spaced. October 28, 2019. Event occurs at 25. Archived from the original on March 22, 2021. Retrieved May 27, 2020 via YouTube.
  121. "Tills, Meena". Star Wars Databank. Archived from the original on April 27, 2010. Retrieved October 8, 2023.
  122. Star Wars: Episode III – Revenge of the Sith DVD commentary featuring George Lucas, Rick McCallum, Rob Coleman, John Knoll and Roger Guyett, [2005]
  123. Lussier, Germain (January 31, 2022). "A Reminder Why George Lucas Loved the Star Wars Special Editions". Gizmodo. Archived from the original on February 1, 2022. Retrieved January 31, 2022.
  124. P., Ken (November 11, 2002). "An Interview with Gary Kurtz". IGN. Archived from the original on April 24, 2012. Retrieved August 5, 2023.
  125. Perry, Spencer (June 29, 2020). "Guardians of the Galaxy: James Gunn Reveals Cut Line He Wants to "George Lucas" Back Into Film". ComicBook.com. Archived from the original on July 30, 2022. Retrieved July 30, 2022.
  126. Zogbi, Emily (July 27, 2022). "Stranger Things Writers Respond to Theories Claiming They Edited Previous Seasons". Comic Book Resources. Archived from the original on July 30, 2022. Retrieved July 30, 2022.
  127. Travers, Peter (March 14, 2002). "E.T. The Extra-Terrestrial". Rolling Stone. Archived from the original on January 14, 2009. Retrieved February 10, 2022.
  128. Hewitt, Chris. "E.T. The Extra-Terrestrial: 20th Anniversary Special Edition". Empire. Archived from the original on June 19, 2013. Retrieved February 10, 2022.
  129. Quint (aka Eric Vespe) (June 3, 2011). "Spielberg Speaks! Jaws Blu-Ray in the Works with No 'Digital Corrections!". Ain't It Cool News. Archived from the original on October 24, 2013. Retrieved February 14, 2022. There's going to be no more digital enhancements or digital additions to anything based on any film I direct. ... When people ask me which E.T. they should look at, I always tell them to look at the original 1982 E.T.
  130. "Free Hat". South Park. Season 6. Episode 9. July 10, 2002. Event occurs at 1:00. Comedy Central. In this version [of Empire], the word 'Wookiee' has been changed to 'hair-challenged animal' and the entire cast has been digitally replaced by Ewoks.
  131. "Peter's Two Dads". Family Guy. Season 5. Episode 10. February 11, 2007. Event occurs at 17:30. Fox. And I'm Hayden Christensen.
  132. Posehn, Brian (2017). Posehn 25x2. Comedy Dynamics. Event occurs at 20:30. ... as nerds, we were like, they didn't need fixing. It already was special. ... We don't need more fucking dewbacks in the background.
  133. Steinberg, Nick (March 19, 2018). "Steven Spielberg Regrets Replacing Guns With Walkie-Talkies In 'E.T.'". Goliath. Archived from the original on August 15, 2020. Retrieved May 12, 2021.
  134. Fralin II, Phillip (July 18, 2021). "Star Wars & 9 Other Movies That Don't Have A Clear-Cut "Definitive" Version". Comic Book Resources. Archived from the original on February 10, 2022. Retrieved February 10, 2022.
  135. Hunt, Bill (November 25, 2020). "Lord of the Rings, The: The Motion Picture Trilogy (4K UHD Review)". The Digital Bits. Archived from the original on May 12, 2021. Retrieved May 12, 2021.
  136. Patches, Matt (December 6, 2020). "Peter Jackson explains the changes he made for Lord of the Rings' 4K edition". Polygon. Archived from the original on April 30, 2021. Retrieved May 12, 2021.
  137. Ponniah, Gabriel (February 7, 2021). "Lord Of The Rings 4K vs HD: Which Is Better?". Screen Rant. Archived from the original on February 9, 2021. Retrieved May 12, 2021.
  138. Lucas, George (September 15, 2004). "Lucas talks as 'Star Wars' trilogy returns" (Interview). San Rafael, California. Associated Press. Archived from the original on January 19, 2016. Retrieved December 18, 2015.
  139. Pooley, Jack (September 7, 2021). "20 Things You Didn't Know About Star Wars: Attack Of The Clones". WhatCulture. Archived from the original on September 9, 2021. Retrieved September 9, 2021.
  140. Wojnar, Zak (April 8, 2018). "The Last Jedi's Throne Room Continuity Error (Doesn't Matter)". Screen Rant. Archived from the original on November 12, 2020. Retrieved September 14, 2020.
  141. Snell, Clarence (October 31, 2023). "10 Star Wars CGI Mistakes That Fans Completely Missed". Screen Rant. Archived from the original on October 31, 2023. Retrieved November 4, 2023.
  142. Elvy, Craig (June 28, 2020). "Star Wars: Phantom Menace's CGI Mistake That George Lucas Never Fixed". Screen Rant. Archived from the original on June 29, 2020. Retrieved June 29, 2020.
  143. Thiessen, Sean (March 13, 2023). "The Worst Star Wars Movie Has A Six-Hour Cut That Is Mind-Blowingly Awesome". Giant Freakin Robot. Archived from the original on March 14, 2023. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
  144. Britt, Ryan (April 25, 2017). "Why Lucasfilm Says Unaltered 'Star Wars' Trilogy Will Never Return". Inverse. Archived from the original on August 26, 2019. Retrieved August 25, 2019.
  145. 1 2 Now This [@nowthisnews] (December 12, 2019). "J.J. Abrams is calling for the original versions of 'Star Wars' to be released" (Tweet). Retrieved December 15, 2019 via Twitter.
  146. Eisenberg, Eric (December 15, 2019). "Don't Expect Any Special Editions Of The Star Wars Sequel Trilogy". CinemaBlend. Archived from the original on January 2, 2020. Retrieved January 5, 2020.
  147. Britt, Ryan (July 7, 2020). "'Rise of Skywalker' edit reveals what J.J. Abrams got wrong about Star Wars". Inverse. Archived from the original on August 10, 2020. Retrieved September 14, 2020.
  148. Goodman, Kyle (July 9, 2020). "Fan-Edited 'Rise of Skywalker' Ending Is the Thing of Dreams". The Cultured Nerd. Archived from the original on August 15, 2020. Retrieved September 14, 2020.
  149. Lindbergh, Ben (March 26, 2021). "What the Snyder Cut Means for the Future of Fandom". The Ringer. Archived from the original on March 26, 2021. Retrieved May 10, 2021.
  150. Britt, Ryan (January 3, 2020). "'Rise of Skywalker' JJ Abrams cut is "bullshit," trusted leaker says". Inverse. Archived from the original on January 16, 2020. Retrieved August 5, 2021.
  151. Scribner, Herb (July 28, 2020). "The latest 'Star Wars' rumor suggests there's a George Lucas cut for 'Rise of Skywalker'". Deseret News. Archived from the original on August 5, 2021. Retrieved August 5, 2021.
  152. Beschizza, Rob (May 14, 2022). "Claimed footage of cinemagoers' reaction to Darth Vader's 'I am your father' line has another surprise". Boing Boing. Archived from the original on May 15, 2022. Retrieved May 15, 2022.
  153. Liles, Jordan (July 19, 2021). "The 'I Am Your Father' 1980 Audience Reaction Video Is Fake, But We Found a Real One". Snopes. Archived from the original on July 21, 2022. Retrieved July 21, 2022.
  154. Gilman, Andrew (May 24, 2021). "Disney Just Changed How Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker Looks on Disney+". The Direct. Archived from the original on July 29, 2022. Retrieved May 15, 2022.
  155. Plale, Mathew (March 11, 2023). "Jon Favreau wonders who even cares about original Star Wars versions". JoBlo. Archived from the original on March 12, 2023. Retrieved March 12, 2023.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.