Piper PA-44-180 Seminole
T-tail of aircraft (Tu-154)

A T-tail is an empennage configuration in which the tailplane is mounted to the top of the fin. The arrangement looks like the capital letter T, hence the name. The T-tail differs from the standard configuration in which the tailplane is mounted to the fuselage at the base of the fin.

Advantages

T-tails were common in early jet aircraft. Designers were worried that an engine failure would otherwise damage the horizontal tail.

The T-tail is very common on aircraft with engines mounted in nacelles on a high-winged aircraft or on aircraft with the engines mounted on the rear of the fuselage, as it keeps the tail clear of the jet exhaust.[1] Rear-mounting the engines keeps the wings clean and improves short-field performance. This was necessary in early jet aircraft with less powerful engines.[2]

T-tail aircraft can have better short-field performance,[2] such as on the Avro RJ-85. The disturbed airflow over a lower stabilizer can make control more difficult at lower speeds.[1]

During normal flying conditions, the tailplane of a T-tail is out of the disturbed airflow behind the wing and fuselage,[2] which provides for more consistent elevator response.[3]

The design and structure of a T-tail can be simpler.[2]

For a transsonic aircraft a T-tail configuration may improve pitch control effectiveness, because the elevator is not in disturbed air behind the fuselage, particularly at moderate angles of attack.

Depending on wing location, the elevator may remain in undisturbed airflow during a stall. (However, T-tail aircraft may be vulnerable to deep stall, see Disadvantages below.)

An aircraft with a T-tail may be easier to recover from a spin, as the elevator is not in a position to block airflow over the rudder, which would make it ineffective, as can happen if the horizontal tail is directly below the fin and rudder.[4]

The T-tail increases the effectiveness of the vertical tail because of "end plate" effect. The horizontal stabilizer acts like a winglet, reducing induced drag of the rudder.[5][2] Smaller and lighter T-tails are often used on modern gliders.

When the vertical tail is swept, the horizontal tail can be made smaller because it is further rearwards and therefore has a greater lever arm. Tail sweep may be necessary at high Mach numbers.

A T-tail may have less interference drag, such as on the Tupolev Tu-154.

T-tails may be used to increase clearance at the rear of a cargo aircraft such as the Boeing C-17 Globemaster, to provide extra clearance when loading the aircraft.[1]

Disadvantages

The aircraft may be prone to deep stall at high angles of attack, when airflow over the tailplane and elevators is blanked by the wings.[6][2] The American McDonnell F-101 Voodoo jet fighter suffered from this problem, as did the British Gloster Javelin, Hawker Siddeley Trident and BAC One-Eleven. A stick-pusher can be fitted to deal with this problem.[2][7]

For propeller aircraft, a T-tail configuration may reduce pitch control effectiveness if the elevators are outside the propeller slipstream.

The vertical stabilizer must be made stronger (and therefore heavier) to support the weight of the tailplane.[1] (However other factors may make the T-tail smaller and lighter, see Advantages above.)

A T-tail produces a strong nose-down pitching moment in sideslip.

T-tails can cause aeroelastic flutter, such as with the Lockheed C-141 Starlifter. The fuselage must be made stiffer to counteract this.

Many large aircraft can have the fin and rudder fold to reduce height in hangars, however this generally isn't feasible or useful if there is a T-tail.

The T-tail configuration can also cause maintenance problems. The control runs to the elevators are more complex,[1] and the surfaces are more difficult to inspect from the ground. The loss of Alaska Airlines Flight 261 was attributed to improper maintenance of the T-tail. T-tails can be harder to inspect or maintain, due to their height.[3]

Adoption

The T-tail can often be found on military transport aircraft, such as the Airbus A400M and the Boeing C-17 Globemaster III. It was used in the 1950s by combat aircraft such as the Gloster Javelin, McDonnell F-101 Voodoo, and Lockheed F-104 Starfighter interceptors, and on the Blackburn Buccaneer attack aircraft.

T-tails are often used on regional airliners and business jets. In the 1960s, several passenger jets with rear-fuselage-mounted engines featured T-tails, such as the BAC One-Eleven, the Vickers VC10, the McDonnell Douglas DC-9, the Boeing 727, the Fokker F28 Fellowship, and the Russian Ilyushin Il-62 and Tupolev Tu-154. It has been used by the Gulfstream family since the Grumman Gulfstream II. It has been used by the Learjet family since their first aircraft, the Learjet 23.

In the 1970s it was used on the McDonnell Douglas MD-80, and the Russian freighter Ilyushin Il-76, as well as the twin turboprop Beechcraft Super King Air. In the 1980s it was used on the Fokker 100 and the British Aerospace 146.

In the 1990s it was used on the Fokker 70, the McDonnell Douglas MD-90, the Boeing 717, the Embraer ERJ family, and the Bombardier CRJ700 series. The single-engine turboprop Pilatus PC-12 also sports a T-tail.

T-tail is especially popular on modern gliders because of the high performance, the safety it provides from accidental spins, and the safety it provides the stabilizer and elevator from foreign object damage on take-off and landing.

See also

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 Hayward, Justin (9 May 2021). "Why Do Some Aircraft Have A T Tail?". Simple Flying. Retrieved 13 October 2022.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Smith, Jim (5 April 2020). "T-time? Why Britain fell in love with the T-tailed aeroplane". Hush-Kit. Retrieved 13 October 2022.
  3. 1 2 Singh, Sumit (29 June 2022). "What Are The Advantages And Disadvantages Of T-Tails?". Simple Flying. Retrieved 13 October 2022.
  4. Bowman, J. S. (December 1971). "Summary of spin technology as related to light general-aviation airplanes" (PDF).
  5. Hoerner and Borst, Fluid Dynamic Lift, Directional Characteristics, T-tail page 13-11
  6. "Gloster Javelin - History". Thunder & Lightnings.
  7. Davies, David P. (1971). Handling the Big Jets: An Explanation of the Significant Differences in Flying Qualities Between Jet Transport Aeroplanes and Piston Engined Transport Aeroplanes, Together with Some Other Aspects of Jet Transport Handling (3rd ed.). Air Registration Board. pp. 116–118. ISBN 0903083019.

Further reading

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.