The tapu resmi was a feudal land tax in the Ottoman Empire.[1]

A tapu was the equivalent of a title deed for farmland, in a feudal system where farmers were proprietors rather than outright owners; this would be recorded in a tapu tahrir, a survey of land ownership and land grants which the Ottoman government used to update land-tax records, and which are now valuable to historians. Not all land was subject to the tapu system; iltizam tax-farming was more commonly applied to non-tapu land.[2] A prominent 16th-century legal theorist argued that tapu resmi was contrary to shari'ah law, and was effectively a bribe; however, tapu resmi continued to be used across the Ottoman Empire.[3]

Tapu resmi was a divani tax on these land titles, payable to the timar holder.[4] Because land inherited land was subject to a change of title, tapu resmi could also be seen as an inheritance tax;[5] but the tapu resmi fee was payable on other transfers too, including when farmland fell vacant because a tenant farmer died or left.[6] After paying tapu resmi, a farmer would still have to pay resm-i çift (or an equivalent tax) each year.

Land which was newly brought under cultivation, such as ifrazat, would be exempt from tapu resmi until the next tahrir (survey).

In 1716, a kanunname (tax code) for the vilayet of Morea set a sliding scale of tapuu resmi fees, from 20 akçes for low-quality land to 60 akçes for high-quality land; this was categorised as a bad-i hava tax, along with adet-i deştbani.[7]

The tapu system was partially reformed during the tanzimat; including increased gender equality, so that women could work or rent out farmland;[8] the responsibility for collecting the tapu resmi passed to dedicated treasury officers rather than feudal lords, and documents were standardised in the 1840s.

References

  1. Jennings, Ronald (January 1978). "Sakaltutan Four Centuries Ago". International Journal of Middle East Studies. 9 (1): 89–98. doi:10.1017/s0020743800051710. JSTOR 16262.
  2. Darling, Linda (1996). Revenue-raising and legitimacy: tax collection and finance administration in the Ottoman Empire, 1560-1660. Brill. p. 126. ISBN 978-90-04-10289-7.
  3. Governing property, making the modern state: law, administration and production in Ottoman Syria. I.B.Tauris. 2007. pp. 16–18. ISBN 978-1-84511-291-2.
  4. Revue internationale d'histoire militaire, Issues 66-68. 1987. p. 31.
  5. Kiel, Machiel (1985). Art and society of Bulgaria in the Turkish period: a sketch of the economic, juridical, and artistic preconditions of Bulgarian post-Byzantine art and its place in the development of the art of the Christian Balkans, 1360/70-1700 : a new interpretation. Van Gorcum. p. 60. ISBN 978-90-232-2061-9.
  6. Mladenović, Miloš (1969). Eastern Europe: historical essays presented to Professor Milos Mladenovic on his sixty-fifth birthday by his students. New Review Books.
  7. "A Historical and Economic Geography of Ottoman Greece". Hesperia Supplements. 34: 53. 2005. JSTOR 4150513.
  8. Governing property, making the modern state: law, administration and production in Ottoman Syria. I.B.Tauris. 2007. pp. 48, 183. ISBN 978-1-84511-291-2.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.