Tūlāk
Khan of the Golden Horde
Western Half (Blue Horde)
Reign1379–1380
PredecessorMuḥammad-Sulṭān
SuccessorTokhtamysh
Died1380
DynastyBorjigin
FatherTughluq Khwaja?
ReligionIslam

Tūlāk (Turki/Kypchak: تولاک‎; Teljak, Tjuljak, Tetjak in Russian texts; died 1380) was Khan in part of the Golden Horde in 1379–1380, as a protégé of the beglerbeg Mamai. While Tūlāk was recognized as khan throughout the territories dominated by his patron Mamai, he was not in possession of the traditional capital Sarai.[1]

Origins

Based on the early readings of coin labels, Tūlāk was long identified with Muḥammad-Sulṭān as a single individual, the supposed Khan Muḥammad-Būlāq ("Muhammad-Bolaq," "Muhammed-Buljak").[2] This identification has had a long influence on subsequent historiography,[3] but has been disproved by recent scholarship, which established that Tūlāk is to be distinguished from his predecessor as Mamai's protégé, Muḥammad-Sulṭān (Mamat-Sultan in Russian sources).[4] The form Būlāq is to be seen as a variant reading of Tūlāk, and to be associated with the khan reigning in 1379–1380, not the khan (Muḥammad-Sulṭān) reigning in 1370–1379.[5]

The source evidence on Tūlāk is extremely limited, and his ancestry is nowhere stated specifically. On the supposition that he was related to his predecessors as Mamai's protégés, and that these came from among the Crimean descendants of Tuqa-Timur (Togai-Timur), son of Jochi, it has been suggested that Tūlāk should be identified with a certain Tawakkul, son of Tughluq Khwāja, son of Mīnkāsar, son of Abāy, son of Kay-Tīmūr, son of Tūqā-Tīmūr, son of Jochi, listed in the detailed genealogical compendium Muʿizz al-ansāb. If this identification is correct, it would make Tūlāk the nephew of ʿAbdallāh Khan and the first cousin of Muḥammad-Sulṭān.[6]

Partnership with Mamai

The reverses suffered by Mamai at the hands of the Russians and of his rivals for possession of Sarai in the late 1370s may have strained his relationship with his protégé, Muḥammad-Sulṭān, who had reached the age of maturity. According to a Russian chronicle, Mamai had his khan murdered, fearing his popularity among his subjects.[7] Although the Russian chronicle gives the impression that Mamai did so to rule on his own,[8] this was not the case.[9] He installed a new khan as his protégé, Tūlāk, the dead khan's cousin, if his ancestry has been identified correctly. This happened before 28 February 1379, when a diploma (yarlik) was issued for the would-be Russian Metropolitan Mihail (Mitjaj) in the name of Tūlāk Khan.[10] This action of Mamai and his new khan has been interpreted as a last-ditch effort to conciliate the increasingly independent Grand Prince Dmitrij Ivanovič of Moscow.[11] If so, the gesture failed, and Mamai and Tūlāk soon adopted a more aggressive stance, attempting to undermine Dmitrij of Moscow from within, and also issuing an ultimatum demanding the payment of renewed and increased tribute. Both sides prepared for the looming conflict, but the Russians stole a march on their foes and attacked them at the Battle of Kulikovo on 8 September 1380. Tūlāk's presence on the battlefield is confirmed by the Russian sources,[12] although his fate is not.[13] He disappears from the sources after finding himself under attack by Dmitrij of Moscow, and it is assumed that he perished in the battle. Mamai's loss of his khan was possibly a contributing factor to his abandonment by many of his emirs, ensuring the triumph of the new khan Tokhtamysh in 1380–1381.[14] Despite his short reign, coins were issued in Tūlāk's name at an unspecified mint and possibly at (old) Astrakhan.[15]

Genealogy

(as identified by Gaev 2002)

See also

References

  1. ↑ Sidorenko 2000: 272-274, 278-280.
  2. ↑ Fren 1832: 21; Savel'ev 1857: 51-59.
  3. ↑ Howorth 1880: 208; Grekov and Jakubovskij 1950: 280, 287; Vernadsky 1953: 246; Safargaliev 1960: 126, 128, 131, 133-134; Grigor'ev 1983: 35-38, 41-42, 47; Bosworth 1996: 252; Mirgaleev 2003: 35; Počekaev 2010: 130-139, 313-316.
  4. ↑ Sidorenko 2000: 278-280; Gaev 2002: 23-25; Sagdeeva 2005: 5, 40-41; Mirgaleev 2003: 37, on the other hand, thinks the name "Tūlāk" refers to Tulun Beg Khanum, as had perhaps Nasonov 1940: 132, n. 3, a rare example of older scholarship to distinguish between the khans Tūlāk and Muḥammad-Sulṭān. Safargaliev 1960: 133, while accepting the name "Muhammed-Buljak" (Muḥammad-Būlāq) for the khan, considers him distinct from his successor, "Tuluk-Bek" (Tūlāk).
  5. ↑ Sidorenko 2000: 280, admitting the (unverified) possibility a coin issue gave Tūlāk's name more fully as Muḥammad-Tūlāk; that Tūlāk and Būlāq were variant readings of the same name was long recognized, e.g., by Grigor'ev 1983: 41-42, 47.
  6. ↑ Gaev 2002: 22-26; Sagdeeva 2005: 5, 41 (agreeing that he was a Togai-Timurid but not making a precise identification); Vohidov 2006: 46; Tizengauzen 2006: 111.
  7. ↑ Polnoe sobranie russkih letopisej 11 (1897) 86; Safargaliev 1960: 138; Sidorenko 2000: 278-279; Gaev 2002: 25; Sagdeeva 2005: 41.
  8. ↑ Safargaliev 1960: 134-135; May 2018: 303.
  9. ↑ Grigor'ev 1983: 46; Sidorenko 2000: 279.
  10. ↑ Safargaliev 1960: 133; Grigor'ev 1983: 35; Sidorenko 2000: 279.
  11. ↑ Počekaev 2010: 137.
  12. ↑ Dmitriev and Lihačëv 1982: 20, 144, 390.
  13. ↑ Sidorenko 2000: 279-280.
  14. ↑ Počekaev 2010: 138-140 (he does not distinguish between Muḥammad-Sulṭān and Tūlāk).
  15. ↑ Sidorenko 2000: 279-280; Sagdeeva 2005: 41.

Sources

  • Bosworth, C. E., The New Islamic Dynasties, New York, 1996.
  • Fren (Frähn), H. M., Monety Hanov Ulusa Džučieva ili Zolotoj Ordy, St Petersburg, 1832.
  • Gaev, A. G., "Genealogija i hronologija Džučidov," Numizmatičeskij sbornik 3 (2002) 9-55.
  • Grekov, B. D., and A. J. Jakubovskij, Zolotaja orda i eë padenie. Moscow, 1950.
  • Grigor'ev, A. P., "Zolotoordynskie hany 60-70-h godov XIV v.: hronologija pravlenii," Istriografija i istočnikovedenie stran Azii i Afriki 7 (1983) 9-54.
  • Howorth, H. H., History of the Mongols from the 9th to the 19th Century. Part II.1. London, 1880.
  • Dmitriev, L. A., and O. P. Lihačëv, Skazanija i povesti o Kulikovskoj bitve, St Petersburg, 1982.
  • May, T., The Mongol Empire. Edinburgh, 2018.
  • Mirgaleev, I. M., Političeskaja istorija Zolotoj Ordy perioda pravlenija Toktamyš-hana, Kazan', 2003.
  • Nasonov, A. N., Mongoly i Rus', Moscow, 1940.
  • Počekaev, R. J., Cari ordynskie: Biografii hanov i pravitelej Zolotoj Ordy. Saint Petersburg, 2010.
  • Polnoe sobranie russkih letopisej 11, St Petersburg, 1897.
  • Sabitov, Ž. M., Genealogija "Tore", Astana, 2008.
  • Safargaliev, M. G., Raspad Zolotoj Ordy. Saransk, 1960.
  • Sagdeeva, R. Z., Serebrjannye monety hanov Zolotoj Ordy, Moscow, 2005.
  • Savel'ev, P., Monety džučidov, džagataidov, dželairidov, St Petersburg, 1857.
  • Sidorenko, V. A., "Hronologija pravlenii zolotoordynskih hanov 1357-1380 gg.," Materialov po arheologii, istorii i ètnografii Tavrii 7 (2000) 267–288.
  • Thackston, W. M. (trans.), Khwandamir, Habibu's-siyar. Tome Three. Cambridge, MA, 1994.
  • Tizengauzen, V. G. (trans.), Sbornik materialov, otnosjaščihsja k istorii Zolotoj Ordy. Izvlečenija iz arabskih sočinenii, republished as Istorija Kazahstana v arabskih istočnikah. 1. Almaty, 2005.
  • Tizengauzen, V. G. (trans.), Sbornik materialov otnosjaščihsja k istorii Zolotoj Ordy. Izvlečenija iz persidskih sočinenii, republished as Istorija Kazahstana v persidskih istočnikah. 4. Almaty, 2006.
  • Vernadsky, G., The Mongols and Russia, New Haven, 1953.
  • Vohidov, Š. H. (trans.), Istorija Kazahstana v persidskih istočnikah. 3. Muʿizz al-ansāb. Almaty, 2006.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.