Ulmus × hollandica 'Etrusca'
Hybrid parentageU. glabra × U. minor
Cultivar'Etrusca'
OriginEngland

The hybrid cultivar Ulmus × hollandica 'Etrusca' was first mentioned by Nicholson in Kew Hand-List Trees & Shrubs 2: 139. 1896, as U. montana (: glabra) var. etrusca, but without description. The tree at Kew,[1] judged by Henry to be "not distinct enough to deserve a special name",[2] was later identified as of hybrid origin, U. glabra × U. minor 'Plotii', by Melville.

Description

The Kew specimen was a small tree with ascending branches.[2] Herbarium specimens show oval or near orbicular leaves (the latter with an abrupt, longish tip, without tapering), and a short petiole.[1]

Etymology

The tree was possibly named for its resemblance to Tuscan cypress. Melville photographed a mature, roughly conical elm at Bulby, Lincolnshire, labelling the photograph U. glabra × U. plotii [:U.minor 'Plotii'], but the tree is otherwise unconnected with 'Etrusca'.[3]

Cultivation

It is not known whether 'Etrusca' remains in cultivation.[4]

Synonymy

  • Ulmus montana (: glabra) var. etrusca: Nicholson in Kew Hand-List Trees & Shrubs 2: 139. 1896.

References

  1. 1 2 "Herbarium specimen 295090, herbariaunited.org" Sheet labelled Ulmus montana var. etrusca (Kew Gardens Specimen, 1909; A. Ley); "Herbarium specimen - WAG.1846700". Botany catalogues. Naturalis Biodiversity Center. Sheet labelled U. glabra etrusca (Kew Gardens specimen)
  2. 1 2 Elwes, Henry John; Henry, Augustine (1913). The Trees of Great Britain & Ireland. Vol. 7. p. 1867.
  3. plot-elms.co.uk/ Lincolnshire/Plot hybrids
  4. Green, Peter Shaw (1964). "Registration of cultivar names in Ulmus". Arnoldia. Arnold Arboretum, Harvard University. 24 (6–8): 41–80. Retrieved 16 February 2017.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.