The Coco Levy Fund Scam was a controversy in the 1970s and 1980s in the Philippines involving former President Ferdinand Marcos and his cronies. It was alleged that Marcos, Danding Cojuangco, Juan Ponce Enrile, and others conspired to tax coconut farmers, promising them the development of the coconut industry and a share of the investments, but on the contrary used the collection fund for personal profit, particularly in the purchase of United Coconut Planters Bank (UCPB) and a majority stake in San Miguel Corporation (SMC), to name a few.[1]

The issue is still ongoing up to this day, with coconut farmers fighting for justice against the forced taxation, and a share of the Coco Levy Fund's investments. The Coco Levy Fund is estimated to have ballooned anywhere in the range of 100 billion to 150 billion in assets.[2][3]

In 2012, a Supreme Court decision[4] awarding ₱71 billion in coconut levy funds to coconut farmers was only part of the goals of a 50-year struggle to bring to the poor farmers the benefits of the Marcos-era levies gouged from them.[5][6]

Background

The Philippine coconut industry was responsible for 26% of the volume of the agricultural sector and was reportedly present in 68 of the 81 provinces of the country.[7] Next to sugar, coconut products was also the leading agricultural export of the Philippines, with 37 products and by-products that were exported to 114 countries. The major exports were crude and refined oil, copra meal, desiccated coconut, activated carbon, and oleo-chemicals.[8] About one-third of the Philippine population depended mainly on coconut production for its livelihood.[9]

The legal beginnings of the levy can be found in Republic Act 1145 enacted on 17 June 1954 under President Ramon Magsaysay, which called for the creation of the Coconut Development Fund. Subsequent amendments were made with the enactment of Republic Act 6260 on 19 June 1971 under President Ferdinand Marcos. The act called for the creation of a Coconut Investment Fund and a Coconut Investment Company (CIC). The objective of the CIC was to: (a) To fully tap the potential of the coconut planters in order to maximize their production and give them greater responsibility in directing and developing the coconut industry; (b) to accelerate the growth of the coconut industry and other related coconut products from the raw material stage to the semi-finished and finally, the finished product stage; (c) to improve, develop and expand the marketing system; and (d) to ensure stable and better incomes for coconut farmers. President Marcos created other funds through P.D. 276, 582, 1468, 961, and 1841, all were to be paid by farmers. Under the idea of "developing PH coco industry", coco farmers paid ₱15-₱30 per ₱100 kilos of copra, constituting 10-25% of their income.[10]

On 30 June 1973, President Marcos created the Philippine Coconut Authority through P.D. 232. The PCA's mandate was "to promote accelerated growth and development of the coconut and other palm oils industry so that the benefits of such growth shall accrue to the greatest number, and to provide continued leadership and support in the integrated development of the industry." The said decree also consolidated the responsibilities and activities of the Coconut Coordinating Council (CCC), the Philippine Coconut Administration (PHILCOA), and the Philippine Coconut Research Institute (PHILCORIN), under one office. P.D. 961 created the Coconut Industry Investment Fund (CIIF), which was allegedly used by Danding Cojuango to purchase shares of San Miguel Corporation."Revolt rocks San Miguel boardroom". www.upi.com. United Press International, Inc. 18 February 1983. Retrieved 12 March 2023.</ref> and was then the largest company and single largest contributor to the national GDP and treasury.[11] CIIF was also used to purchase the so called "big crony-owned" oil mills (known as CIIF-Oil Mills Group) and shares of coco trading and insurance corporations. While the other decrees made ballooning funds, P.D. 1468 revised the Coco Industry Code, supposedly giving crony oil mills control over the said funds. Most coconut farmers and tenants received receipts for paying, but weren't registered by PhilCoA (PCA).

In 1975, for two years, coco levy funds paid by coco farmers amounted to ₱2.14 million, but only 32% of receipts were registered. After P.D. 961 of 1976, and public display of cronyism, such as turning over coco funds to Cojuangco and Defense Minister Juan Ponce Enrile, coco farmers defied martial law in protests. Small protests and defiance were shown by turning CocoFed groups into anti-Marcos meetings. Coco farmers coops/protests grew by 1980 and became a solid foundation of the anti-Marcos movement in the countryside. The Marcos dictatorship met the coco farmers' resistance with violence. Most notable of which are the Daet and Guinayangan (Quezon) massacres.[12][13][14]

By 1982, coco levy funds extracted ₱70 billion from coco farmers. Every penny was used by Marcos cronies to entrench themselves in wealth. The funds were siphoned by Marcos and his cronies into at least 14 holding companies: Soriano Shares Inc., ASC Investors Inc., Roxas Shares Inc., ARC Investors Inc., Toda Holdings Inc., AP Holdings Inc., Fernandez Holdings Inc., SMC Officers Corps Inc., Te Deum Resources Inc., Anglo Ventures Inc., Randy Allied Ventures Inc., Rock Steel Resources Inc., Valhalla Properties Ltd Inc., and First Meridian Development Inc.[15]

Additionally, over the 10 years of collection, Cojuangco, Lobregat, Enrile, Eleazar, dela Cuesta, et al. were board members or chairpersons of PCA, UCPB, COCOFED and Unicom. Enrile, then Senate President, was chair of PCA and Unicom, which he used to get equities from Primex Coco, Pacific Royal, Clear Mineral, and other entities. Danding Cojuangco allegedly used his coco levy positions to funnel money and was used as leverage to further his businesses. Most notable were the UCPB and the SMC, both of which were supposedly purchased directly through coco levy money by Imelda Marcos and Danding Cojuangco.

After the Marcos regime was toppled by the People Power Revolution of 1986, coconut farmers filed numerous cases against Marcos, Cojuangco, and Enrile for squandering farmers' money.[16]

The Coco Levy litigations

The Coco Levy Case (Sandiganbayan Civil Case No. 33) is subdivided into a total of eight cases that involve different parties and properties. Arguably, the most important case is Case No. 33-F, which involves 51% of the shares of mega-conglomerate San Miguel Corporation. This majority stake at San Miguel has been further subdivided into three separate litigations, each of which reaching the Supreme Court in highly contentious proceedings.

The first case involved 4% of San Miguel shares, which, in the case of San Miguel Corporation vs. Sandiganbayan,[17] was awarded by the Supreme Court to the government. The second case, Republic of the Philippines vs. Sandiganbayan and Eduardo Cojuangco Jr.,[18] involved a 20% block that the Supreme Court, voting 7–4, awarded to Eduardo "Danding" Cojuangco. In 2012, the Supreme Court issued a decision in Philippine Coconut Producers Federation, Inc. (COCOFED) vs. Republic of the Philippines,[19] where the Court, voting 11–0, declared that the remaining 27% of San Miguel is owned by the government.[5] (Note: The 27% had been diluted to 24% due to the government's failure to subscribe to the increased authorized capital stock of San Miguel.)

On December 10, 2014, the Supreme Court reaffirmed its September 4, 2012, decision to award to farmers the coco levy fund.[6]

Moves to return funds to farmers

In 2015, the government certified a bill creating a trust fund for farmers as urgent. The bill passed in the House of Representatives but stalled in the Senate.[20]

On February 26, 2021, President Rodrigo Duterte signed the Coconut Farmers and Industry Trust Fund Act, creating a trust fund for the country's coconut farmers.[21] In June 2022, Duterte signed an executive order implementing the Coconut Farmers and Industry Development Plan, which aims to increase productivity and income of coconut farmers, modernize the coconut industry, and pave the way for the release of the 75 billion trust fund for coconut farmers consisting of coco levy assets declared state property by the Supreme Court.[22][23]

See also

References

  1. Panesa, Edmer F. "Cojuangco loses claim to UCPB block". Manila Bulletin. Retrieved 4 December 2007.
  2. Requinta, Elka Krystle R. "UCPB exec talks on coco levy scam". Varsitarian. The Varsitarian Online. Retrieved 16 May 2011.
  3. Tubeza, Philip. "PCGG exec doubts coconut levy fund's recovery". Philippine Daily Inquirer. Archived from the original on 11 June 2010. Retrieved 8 June 2008.
  4. "Philippine Coconut Farmers Federation (COCOFED) vs. Republic of the Philippines". Archived from the original on 20 July 2014. Retrieved 14 January 2013.
  5. 1 2 The Coco Levy Funds: Is the Shell Game Approaching Its End? The CenSEI Report, 16 April 2012
  6. 1 2 Ranada, Pia (10 December 2014). "SC affirms decision to give coco levy funds to farmers". Rappler. Retrieved 4 June 2021.
  7. "Coconut Statistics". pca.gov.ph. Republic of the Philippines: Department of Agriculture. Retrieved 6 October 2019.
  8. Dy, Rolando PhD. "The Philippine Coconut Industry: Performance Issues and Recommendations". Ateneo De Manila University. Retrieved 1 August 2006 via Scribd.
  9. Castro, Manuel. "The Philippine Coconut Industry and the Coconut Levy". Philippine European Solidarity Centre (PESC-KSP). PESC-KSP. Archived from the original on 8 March 2001.
  10. "Republic Act 6260, the Coconut Investment Act". Chan Robles Virtual Law Library. Philippine Congress. 19 June 1971.
  11. "Our Company". www.sanmiguel.com.ph. San Miguel Corporation. Retrieved 5 June 2021.
  12. Doyo, Ma Ceres P. (22 September 2016). "Martial law massacres". INQUIRER.net. Retrieved 5 June 2021.
  13. Gavilan, Jodesz (23 October 2018). "Massacres, incidents of violence against farmers". Rappler. Retrieved 5 June 2021.
  14. Elemia, Camille (21 January 2017). "Coco levy fund scam: Gold for the corrupt, crumbs for farmers". Rappler. Retrieved 5 June 2021.
  15. "Republic Act 11524". www.officialgazette.gov.ph. Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines. Retrieved 5 June 2021.
  16. "Presidential Decree No. 232, Creating a Philippine Coconut Authority". The LawPhil Project. The LawPhil Project, Philippine Laws and Jurisprudence Databank. Arellano Law Foundation. 30 June 1973.
  17. "San Miguel Corporation vs. Sandiganbayan (G.R. No. 104637, September 2000)". Archived from the original on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 14 January 2013.
  18. "Republic of the Philippines vs. Sandiganbayan and Eduardo Cojuangco Jr. (G.R. No. 166859, April 2011)". Archived from the original on 27 August 2011. Retrieved 14 January 2013.
  19. "Philippine Coconut Producers Federation, Inc. (COCOFED) vs. Republic of the Philippines (G.R. No. 177857, January 2012)". Archived from the original on 20 July 2014. Retrieved 14 January 2013.
  20. Elemia, Camille (22 January 2017). "The politics of the coco levy scam: From Marcos to Noynoy Aquino". Rappler. Archived from the original on 3 October 2020. Retrieved 11 October 2021.
  21. Aguilar, Krissy (26 February 2021). "Duterte signs law creating coco levy trust fund". Philippine Daily Inquirer. Archived from the original on 26 February 2021.
  22. Cordero, Ted (8 June 2022). "Duterte issues EO on coconut industry dev't, allowing release of ₱75-B coco levy trust fund". GMA News Online. Archived from the original on 8 June 2022.
  23. Jocson, Luisa Maria Jacinta C. (8 June 2022). "Duterte signs EO implementing coconut industry dev't plan". BusinessWorld. Archived from the original on 8 June 2022.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.