Colonization of China may refer to:

List of non-Han Chinese dynasties

This list includes only the major dynasties of China ruled by non-Han ethnicities, there were many other such dynastic regimes that ruled an area historically or currently associated with "China" not shown in this list. Also, not all non-Han regimes are seen as conquest dynasties, and many of them are actually considered as "infiltration dynasties".

Ethnicity Conquest dynasty Period of rule Territorial extent
Xianbei
鮮卑
Tuyuhun
吐谷渾
284–670 CE Parts of China proper
Former Yan
前燕
337–370 CE
Later Yan
後燕
384–409 CE
Western Qin
西秦
385–400 CE, 409–431 CE
Southern Liang
南涼
397–414 CE
Southern Yan
南燕
398–410 CE
Dai
310–376 CE
Duan Qi
段齊
350–356 CE
Western Yan
西燕
384–394 CE
Northern Wei
北魏
386–535 CE
Eastern Wei
東魏
534–550 CE
Western Wei
西魏
535–557 CE
Northern Zhou
北周
557–581 CE
Di
Chouchi
仇池
296–371 CE, 385–443 CE
Cheng-Han
成漢
304–347 CE
Former Qin
前秦
351–394 CE
Later Liang
後涼
386–403 CE
Xiongnu
匈奴
Han-Zhao
漢趙
304–329 CE
Northern Liang
北涼
397–439 CE
Hu Xia
胡夏
407–431 CE
Xu
618–619 CE
Jie
Later Zhao
後趙
319–351 CE
Hou Han
侯漢
551–552 CE
Qiang
Later Qin
後秦
384–417 CE
Dingling
丁零
Zhai Wei
翟魏
388–392 CE
Sogdian
粟特[1]
Former Yan
前燕
756–759 CE
Göktürk
突厥
Later Yan
後燕
759–763 CE
Shatuo
沙陀
Former Jin
前晉
907–923 CE
Later Tang
後唐
923–937 CE
Later Jin[2]
後晉
936–947 CE
Later Han[3]
後漢
947–951 CE
Northern Han
北漢
951–979 CE
Khitan
契丹
Liao dynasty
遼朝
916–1125 CE
Dongdan
東丹
926–936 CE
Northern Liao
北遼
1122–1123 CE
Western Liao
西遼
1124–1218 CE
Eastern Liao
東遼
1213–1269 CE
Later Liao
後遼
1216–1219 CE
Baiman
白蠻
Dali
大理
937–1094 CE, 1096–1253 CE
Dazhong
大中
1094–1096 CE
Tangut
党項
Western Xia
西夏
1038–1227 CE
Shun dynasty
順朝
1644–1646 CE
Jurchen
女真
Jin dynasty
金朝
1115–1234 CE
Eastern Xia
東夏
1215–1233 CE
Later Jin
後金
1616–1636 CE
Mongol
蒙古
Yuan dynasty
元朝
1271–1368 CE All of China proper
Northern Yuan
北元
1368–1635 CE Parts of China proper
Manchu
滿洲
Qing dynasty
清朝
1636–1912 CE All of China proper

List of Western, Russian/Soviet, and Japanese concessions

Country Concession Location (modern name) Year established Year dissolved Note
International Shanghai International Settlement Shanghai 1863 1945 Formed from the British and American concessions. It was initially ruled by: Austria-Hungary, Denmark, France, Italy, The Netherlands, Norway-Sweden, Portugal, Russia, Spain, the United Kingdom, and the United States.
Beijing Legation Quarter Beijing 1861 1945 Covering some 3 acres and including 11 foreign embassies, the entire Legation Quarter was considered foreign sovereign ground and was off limits for Chinese citizens who were not allowed to take up residency within the legation grounds
Kulangsu International Settlement Xiamen 1903 1945 On January 10, 1902, the consuls of Great Britain, the United States, Germany, France, Italy, Spain, Denmark, the Netherlands, Sweden-Norway, Japan and other eight countries signed the "Gulangyu delimitation charter" in the Kulangyu Japanese Consulate. Subsequently, in January 1903, the Kulangsu International Settlement Municipal Council was established
Austria-Hungary Austro-Hungarian concession of Tianjin Tianjin 1902 1917
Belgium Belgian concession of Tianjin Tianjin 1902 1931 [4]
France Kwang-Chou-Wan[5] Zhanjiang 1898 1946 [5]
French Concession of Shanghai Shanghai 1849 1946
French Concession of Shamian Island, Guangzhou Guangzhou 1861 1946
French concession of Hankou Hankou 1896 1946
French concession of Tianjin Tianjin 1861 1946
French Railway, Kunming Kunming 1904 1940 After the French, WWII saw a significant influx of American troops.
Germany Kiautschou Bay leased territory Qingdao 1898 1914
German concession of Hankou Hankou 1895 1917
German concession of Tianjin Tianjin 1895 1917
Italy Italian concession of Tianjin Tianjin 1901 1947 [6]
Italian Concession of Shanghai Shanghai 1902 1943 [7]
Italian Concession of Amoy Amoy 1902 1943 [8]
Japan Kwantung Leased Territory/South Manchuria Railway Zone Dalian 1905 1945 Obtained from Russia.
Kiautschou Bay leased territory in Shandong Peninsula Qingdao 1914 1922 Acquisition from Germany was acknowledged by China in 1915, concession was held until 1922,[9] ceded to China in Washington Naval Treaty.[10]| rowspan="6" | France| rowspan="8" | Japan
Japanese concession of Tianjin Tianjin 1898 1945 Kept by Japan until WWII capitulation.
Japanese concession of Hankou Hankou 1898 1945 Kept by Japan until WWII capitulation.
Japanese concession of Chongqing Chongqing 1897 1937 Abandoned at outbreak of Second Sino-Japanese War.[11]
Japanese concession of Suzhou Suzhou 1897 1943 [12]
Japanese concession of Hangzhou Hangzhou 1897 1943 [12]
Japanese concession of Shashi Shashi 1898 1943 [12]
Russia,
Soviet Union
Russian Dalian Dalian 1898; 1945 1905; 1950 [13] Re-occupied by the Soviet Union in 1945–1950.[14]
Russian concession of Tianjin Tianjin 1900 1924
Russian concession of Hankou Hankou 1896 1924 [15]
Chinese Eastern Railway, Harbin Harbin 1896 1952 Re-occupied by the Soviet Union after the 1929 Sino-Soviet conflict.[16] Railway was returned in 1952.[17]
Port Arthur Lüshunkou District 1895 1905 Acquired from Japan in Triple Intervention, lost in Russo-Japanese War.
Russian concession of Liaodong Peninsula Liaodong 1898 1905 Included Port Arthur
United Kingdom New Territories, Hong Kong Hong Kong 1898 1997
Weihaiwei leased territory Weihai 1898 1930 Liugong Island remained under British control as a separate territory until 1940
Liugong Island Weihai 1930 1940 Formerly part of Weihaiwei leased territory since 1898[18]
British concession of Tianjin Tianjin 1860 1945
British concession of Hankou Hankou 1861 1927
British Concession of Jiujiang Jiujiang 1861 1929
British concession of Zhenjiang Zhenjiang 1861 1929
British concession of Shamian Island, Guangzhou Guangzhou 1861 1945
British concession of Amoy Xiamen 1852 1930
British concession of Dalian Dalian 1858 1860
British concession of Shanghai Shanghai 1846 1863 Merged to form Shanghai International Settlement
Trading warehouses at Tengchong (Tengyue) Yunnan Late 19th/early 20th century. Still standing, with bullet holes. British diplomat Augustus Margary was murdered here in 1875. Consulate built 1921.
United States American concession of Shanghai Shanghai 1848 1863 Merged to form Shanghai International Settlement
American concession of Tianjin Tianjin 1860 1902 Merged to form British concession in Tianjin

References

  1. An Lushan's father was of Sogdian and his mother was of Göktürk origin.
  2. Wudai Shi ch. 75. 舊五代史/卷75  (in Chinese) via Wikisource.{{citation}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link) Considering the father was originally called Nieliji without a surname, the fact that his patrilineal ancestors all had Chinese names here indicates that these names were probably all created posthumously after Shi Jingtang became a "Chinese" emperor. Shi Jingtang actually claimed to be a descendant of Chinese historical figures Shi Que and Shi Fen, and insisted that his ancestors went westwards towards non-Han Chinese area during the political chaos at the end of the Han dynasty in the early 3rd century.
  3. According to Old History of the Five Dynasties, vol. 99, and New History of the Five Dynasties, vol. 10. Liu Zhiyuan was of Shatuo origin. According to Wudai Huiyao, vol. 1 Liu Zhiyuan's great-great-grandfather Liu Tuan (劉湍) (titled as Emperor Mingyuan posthumously, granted the temple name of Wenzu) descended from Liu Bing (劉昞), Prince of Huaiyang, a son of Emperor Ming of Han
  4. Anne-Marie Brady; Douglas Brown (2013). Foreigners and Foreign Institutions in Republican China. Routledge. p. 27. ISBN 978-0-415-52865-8.
  5. 1 2 Geoffrey C. Gunn (1 November 2016). Wartime Macau: Under the Japanese Shadow. Hong Kong University Press. p. 28. ISBN 978-988-8390-51-9.
  6. Marinelli, Maurizio (2010-09-01). "The genesis of the Italian concession in Tianjin: a combination of wishful thinking and realpolitik". Journal of Modern Italian Studies. 15 (4): 536–556. doi:10.1080/1354571X.2010.501975. ISSN 1354-571X. S2CID 144357230.
  7. The concession was commercial (Italy’s Encounters with Modern China: Imperial Dreams, Strategic Ambitions
  8. The concession was commercial (M. Marinelli. "Italy’s Encounters with Modern China: Imperial Dreams, Strategic Ambitions")
  9. Boissoneault, Lorraine. "The Surprisingly Important Role China Played in WWI". Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 2022-04-27.
  10. Asada, Sadao (1961). "Japan's "Special Interests" and the Washington Conference". The American Historical Review. 67 (1): 62–70. doi:10.2307/1846262. ISSN 0002-8762. JSTOR 1846262.
  11. "Chongqing – History | Britannica". www.britannica.com. Retrieved 2022-05-02.
  12. 1 2 3 Rethinking the Russo-Japanese War, 1904-5. Vol. 2, The Nichinan papers. Chiharu Inaba, J. W. M. Chapman. Folkestone, UK: Global Oriental. 2007. p. 187. ISBN 978-90-04-21332-6. OCLC 755068887. After the [First] Sino-Japanese War, Japan had won jurisdiction over concessions in ports such as Tianjin, Mukden, Hankou, Hangzhou, Suzhou, Shashi, and Chongqing. [...] Those at Tianjin and Hankou were seen by the Japanese Government as 'developed' concessions, while those at Suzhou, Hangzhou, and Chongqing were called 'undeveloped'.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: others (link)
  13. "CHINA'S GRANTS TO RUSSIA; Leases of Port Arthur and Talien-wan and the Railway Concession Signed at Pekin. CONTROL TO BE GIVEN TO-DAY China to Retain Sovereign Rights, but Russia to Take the Forts and Collect the Customs – A New Treaty Port". The New York Times. 1898-03-28. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2022-05-02.
  14. Hess, Christian (2018-01-01). "Sino-Soviet City: Dalian between Socialist Worlds, 1945–1955". Journal of Urban History. 44 (1): 9–25. doi:10.1177/0096144217710234. ISSN 0096-1442. S2CID 149414746.
  15. Crawford, Alan (2018). "Imagining the Russian Concession in Hankou". The Historical Journal. 61 (4): 969–989. doi:10.1017/S0018246X17000528. ISSN 0018-246X. S2CID 159946531.
  16. Walker, Michael M. (2017). The 1929 Sino-Soviet war : the war nobody knew. Lawrence, Kansas. ISBN 978-0-7006-2375-4. OCLC 966274204.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  17. Elleman, Bruce A. (1994). "The Soviet Union's Secret Diplomacy Concerning the Chinese Eastern Railway, 1924–1925". The Journal of Asian Studies. 53 (2): 459–486. doi:10.2307/2059842. ISSN 0021-9118. JSTOR 2059842. S2CID 162586404.
  18. Fiona de Londras; Siobhán Mullally (4 December 2014). Irish Yearbook of International Law. Bloomsbury Publishing. p. 24. ISBN 978-1-84946-975-3.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.