| Publishers | Entertainment Concepts Inc. (ECI) |
|---|---|
| Years active | ~1990 to current |
| Genres | Role-playing, science fiction |
| Languages | English |
| Players | 40 |
| Playing time | Fixed |
| Materials required | Instructions, order sheets, turn results, paper, pencil |
| Media type | Play-by-mail or email |
Power (also Power+) is a closed-end, computer-moderated, play-by-mail space-based game of intrigue. It was published by Entertainment Concepts Inc. (ECI). By late 1985, an updated version of the game, Power+, had replaced Power. Gameplay involved 40 players vying for rulership of a space empire comprising 35 planets. Players could interact with hundreds of non-player forces including dozens of organization types and individuals. Each turn, players chose from a menu of available actions, many related to intrigue.
History and development
Power was published by Entertainment Concepts Inc. (ECI).[1] The medium complexity game was computer moderated and closed-ended.[1] By late 1985, an updated version of the game, Power+, had replaced Power.
Gameplay
40 players per game vie for rulership of a space empire comprising 35 planets.[2] 585 non-player forces (NPFs) were in play, ranging from military and government organizations to civilian groups and individuals of various types.[2] Victory conditions varied by player.[3] They generally required 16 turns controlling the throne and many NPFs, although eliminating all other players also worked.[4] To be crowned ruler, players required "popularity, wealth, and Senate approval".[2]
NPFs included anti-Government groups, militaries, spies and assassins, guards, churches, courtiers, diplomats, entertainers, mercenaries, reporters, executives, PR men, police, Royal guards and servants, saboteurs, the Secret Service, the Senate, terrorists, and unions.[5]
Players chose up to twenty actions per turn from a menu. These included "investigation, movement, investment, propaganda, hiring NPFs ... slander, theft, blackmail, bribe ... assassination, [and] military combat".[2] The game was in a separate category of games with Illuminati in that "almost everything happens through manipulation of third parties rather than direct physical involvement".[6]
Reception
Bob McLain reviewed the game in a 1984 issue of Gaming Universal, stating, "This is ECI's first attempt at a totally computer moderated game, but they seem to have done an excellent job."[1]
See also
References
- 1 2 3 McLain 1984. p. 29.
- 1 2 3 4 Safigan, et al. 1985. p. 18.
- ↑ Couldshed 1985. p. 26.
- ↑ Safigan, et al. 1985. pp. 18–19.
- ↑ Palmer 1985. p. 27.
- ↑ Flagship Editors 1985. p. 29.
Bibliography
- Coulshed, Mark; Dunne, Bill (Autumn 1985). "Power: Flagship Demonstration Game". Flagship. No. 8. p. 26.
- Dutton, Jim (January–February 1984). "Concepts for Entertainment". Gaming Universal. No. 2. pp. 18–19.
- Editors (Summer 1985). "The Spokesmen Speak...". Flagship. No. 7. p. 29.
- Kelly, John W. (November–December 1985). "An Historic Review of Power". Paper Mayhem. No. 15. p. 21.
- Maddox, Raymond (Autumn 1985). "Powermonger". Flagship. No. 8. p. 26.
- McLain, Bob (January–February 1984). "Gamealog: Power". Gaming Universal. No. 2. p. 44.
- Palmer, Nicky (Autumn 1985). "The Battle for Influence". Flagship. No. 8. p. 27.
- Safigan, Steve; Palmer, Nicky; Coulshed, Mark; Robertson, Bruce; Vallance, William (Summer 1985). "Power: Flagship Demonstration Game". Flagship. No. 7. pp. 18–19.
Further reading
- Maddox, Raymond (Summer 1985). "Powermonger". Flagship. No. 7. p. 19.
- Michell, Bill (Winter 1985). "Ned Stillwell's Advice to the Aspiring Powermonger". Flagship. No. 9. p. 23.
- Thomas, Cameron; Palmer, Nicky (Winter 1985). "Power: Flagship Demonstration Game". Flagship. No. 9. p. 22.
- Editors (Spring 1986). "Power: Flagship Demonstration Game". Flagship. No. 10. p. 29.
- Editors (Summer 1986). "Power: Flagship Demonstration Game". Flagship. No. 11. pp. 30–31.
- Editors (Spring 1987). "Power: Demo Game ... Gone!". Flagship. No. 14. p. 9.
- King, Paul (Autumn 1987). "Where Lies the Power". Flagship. No. 16. pp. 27–29.