Map showing extent and types of permafrost in the Northern Hemisphere

The soil carbon feedback concerns the releases of carbon from soils in response to global warming. This response under climate change is a positive climate feedback. There is approximately two to three times more carbon in global soils than the Earth's atmosphere,[1][2] which makes understanding this feedback crucial to understand future climate change. An increased rate of soil respiration is the main cause of this feedback, where measurements imply that 4 °C of warming increases annual soil respiration by up to 37%.[3]

Impact on climate change

Impact of elevated CO2 on soil carbon reserves

An observation based study on future climate change, on the soil carbon feedback, conducted since 1991 in Harvard, suggests release of about 190 petagrams of soil carbon, the equivalent of the past two decades of greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuel burning, until 2100 from the top 1-meter of Earth's soils, due to changes in microbial communities under elevated temperatures.[4][5]

A 2018 study concludes, "Climate-driven losses of soil carbon are currently occurring across many ecosystems, with a detectable and sustained trend emerging at the global scale."[2][6]

Permafrost

Thawing of permafrost (frozen ground), which is located in higher latitudes, the Arctic and sub-Arctic regions, suggest based on observational evidence a linear and chronic release of greenhouse gas emissions with ongoing climate change from these carbon dynamics.[7]

Tipping point

A study published in 2011 identified a so-called compost-bomb instability, related to a tipping point with explosive soil carbon releases from peatlands. The authors noted that there is a unique stable soil carbon equilibrium for any fixed atmospheric temperature.[8] Despite the prediction that the carbon balance of peatlands is going to shift from a sink to a source this century, peatland ecosystems are still omitted from the main Earth system models and integrated assessment models.[9]

Uncertainties

Climate models do not account for effects of biochemical heat release associated with microbial decomposition.[8] A limitation in our understanding of carbon cycling comes from the insufficient incorporation of soil animals, including insects and worms, and their interactions with microbial communities into global decomposition models.[10][11]

See also

References

  1. ↑ "Study: Soils Could Release Much More Carbon Than Expected as Climate Warms". Berkeley Lab. March 9, 2017.
  2. 1 2 Bond-Lamberty; et al. (2018). "Globally rising soil heterotrophic respiration over recent decades". Nature. 560 (7716): 80–83. Bibcode:2018Natur.560...80B. doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0358-x. PMID 30068952. S2CID 51893691.
  3. ↑ Hicks Pries, Caitlin E.; Castanha, C.; Porras, R. C.; Torn, M. S. (31 March 2017). "The whole-soil carbon flux in response to warming". Science. 355 (6332): 1420–1423. Bibcode:2017Sci...355.1420H. doi:10.1126/science.aal1319. PMID 28280251. S2CID 206654333.
  4. ↑ "One of the oldest climate change experiments has led to a troubling conclusion". The Washington Post. October 5, 2017.
  5. ↑ Melillo; et al. (2017). "Long-term pattern and magnitude of soil carbon feedback to the climate system in a warming world". Science. AAAS. 358 (6359): 101–105. Bibcode:2017Sci...358..101M. doi:10.1126/science.aan2874. hdl:1912/9383. PMID 28983050.
  6. ↑ "In vicious cycle, warmer soil results in carbon to be released into the atmosphere from the soil, making climate change worse, study says". AP. 2018.
  7. ↑ Schuur; et al. (2014). "Climate change and the permafrost carbon feedback". Nature. 520 (7546): 171–179. Bibcode:2015Natur.520..171S. doi:10.1038/nature14338. PMID 25855454. S2CID 4460926.
  8. 1 2 S. Wieczorek, P. Ashwin, C. M. Luke, P. M. Cox (2011). "Excitability in ramped systems: the compost-bomb instability". Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. The Royal Society. 467 (2129): 1243–1269. Bibcode:2011RSPSA.467.1243W. doi:10.1098/rspa.2010.0485. hdl:10871/9407.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  9. ↑ Loisel, J.; Gallego-Sala, A. V.; Amesbury, M. J.; Magnan, G.; Anshari, G.; Beilman, D. W.; Benavides, J. C.; Blewett, J.; Camill, P.; Charman, D. J.; Chawchai, S. (2020-12-07). "Expert assessment of future vulnerability of the global peatland carbon sink". Nature Climate Change. 11: 70–77. doi:10.1038/s41558-020-00944-0. hdl:10871/123307. ISSN 1758-6798. S2CID 227515903.
  10. ↑ Crowther, Thomas W.; Thomas, Stephen M.; Maynard, Daniel S.; Baldrian, Petr; Covey, Kristofer; Frey, Serita D.; Diepen, Linda T. A. van; Bradford, Mark A. (2015-05-14). "Biotic interactions mediate soil microbial feedbacks to climate change". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 112 (22): 7033–7038. Bibcode:2015PNAS..112.7033C. doi:10.1073/pnas.1502956112. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 4460469. PMID 26038557.
  11. ↑ Lewis, Renee (2015-05-19). "The diet of worms: Soil dwellers emerge as climate change heroes in study". america.aljazeera.com. Retrieved 2021-11-30.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.